dap-addict wrote:Wow, what a post and what a project!
What to say?
For me it's a bit difficult to vote for Goldie and/or Henessy because they were not DAP-able at all and never even tried to do it. I think at least 1 DAP in 1 position or at least 1 DAPattempt in 2 failed positions is the minimum entry of a porn poll today.
1 DAP in my definition is minimum both dickheads inside for minimum 1min. 1 DAPattempt is both dickheads trying to enter the girls ass, but popping out for various reasons, they try at least in 2 positions for a reasonable time adding up to 30-60 or more seconds.
Anyway, on the other at their time Goldie and Henessy were very popular, thats true.
justinwarren41 wrote:Well done sir. And appreciate your flexibility based on feedback too.
When does the next round start up?
BobbyC wrote:Wow!! Amazing. Rebel Rhyder seems like a must, I cant remember seeing her in your list. Ill get back to this. Great work thanks, a labour of love?
pronossstat wrote:Advance to the Top-50 from Czech and East Europe groups together:
pronossstat wrote:And moreover, we will have another 5 polls for other aspects of performance: Passion (enthusiasm, active sex etc), Gape, Oral Performance (deepthroat/rimming), Vaginal Skills (DVP/TVP/Vaginal fisting), Squirting
These polls won't be for each group, no, just 10 girls selected from all groups for each poll. Selection is on my opinion, I will pick girls with some exceptional performance in these aspects
dap-addict wrote:What a great and very elaborated poll!
dap-addict wrote:pronossstat wrote:And moreover, we will have another 5 polls for other aspects of performance: Passion (enthusiasm, active sex etc), Gape, Oral Performance (deepthroat/rimming), Vaginal Skills (DVP/TVP/Vaginal fisting), Squirting
These polls won't be for each group, no, just 10 girls selected from all groups for each poll. Selection is on my opinion, I will pick girls with some exceptional performance in these aspects
Will there be one of these 5 group selections for each TOP50 girls?
Because if not, then you would actually favorite some girls with your picks, ie. give them a bigger chance to win more points. Or do I maybe not understand the concept?
dap-addict wrote:Btw, no need to vote on vaginal porn skills imho!
pronossstat wrote:dap-addict wrote:Will there be one of these 5 group selections for each TOP50 girls?
Because if not, then you would actually favorite some girls with your picks, ie. give them a bigger chance to win more points. Or do I maybe not understand the concept?
I'm afraid you understand it right I would be happy to include more girls in these polls, but they are restricted to 10 options
dap-addict wrote:pronossstat wrote:dap-addict wrote:Will there be one of these 5 group selections for each TOP50 girls?
Because if not, then you would actually favorite some girls with your picks, ie. give them a bigger chance to win more points. Or do I maybe not understand the concept?
I'm afraid you understand it right I would be happy to include more girls in these polls, but they are restricted to 10 options
Why cant you group the TOP50 girls in 5 categories according to their TOP competence and/or talent?
Because in that way every of those TOP50 girls would get a chance to win some additional points.
dap-addict wrote:pronossstat wrote:dap-addict wrote:Will there be one of these 5 group selections for each TOP50 girls?
Because if not, then you would actually favorite some girls with your picks, ie. give them a bigger chance to win more points. Or do I maybe not understand the concept?
I'm afraid you understand it right I would be happy to include more girls in these polls, but they are restricted to 10 options
Why cant you group the TOP50 girls in 5 categories according to their TOP competence and/or talent?
Because in that way every of those TOP50 girls would get a chance to win some additional points.
dap-addict wrote:Why cant you group the TOP50 girls in 5 categories according to their TOP competence and/or talent?
Because in that way every of those TOP50 girls would get a chance to win some additional points.
dap-addict wrote:It's okay, prono, its your poll.
I just think with these additional polls based on your own subjective choices and with not every girl having a chance to earn additional points the end result becomes less objective.
pronossstat wrote:43 votes for her in DVP, 31 - best other result in all other polls, so I think, for now we have at least 10-15 fake votes for Nici in every poll.
I'm not sure what exactly to do with this. Should I totally ban her, or cut this 10-15 votes, or just remove her from Perversion poll like I did with Nicole (because I include both of them last moment, they shouldn't be there in first place)?
I haven't decide yet, but obviously she won't be in the Final-10, I appreciate my work here too much to be okay with such spam.
dap-addict wrote:I dont quote all, but I adore all this your post here.
dap-addict wrote:But if you'd ask me, I'd not deduct 10-15 votes, but just ban her.
Sorry, too bad, but sorry!
dap-addict wrote:Btw, all in all, at this moment Rebecca Sharon seems a bit too high up to me.
But here I cant find any explanation at all because she hasnt any kind of lobby within forum talkers as far as I could see over last few years.
Just keep a close eye on her!
I like her, she's an undervalued actress also by producers, that's no question, but she cant end TOP10 really in such a poll. Lest she collects really a lot of those 5 additional poll votes!
backflipman wrote:As for Rebecca Sharon I have to say she really is underrated, she started with 18 is kinda cute, has impressive anal skills a big gape and is active for 8 years already. Maybe there was too much studio swapping, scene where she somehow couldn't really shine often, because co-stars, males, make-up, setup or action was lackluster.
For example she never did a Gonzo or SOS scene with Charlie Mac, who I still believe was a sales booster. She didn't have Gonzo scenes with popular females active in that time like Arwen Gold, Ria Sunn (who debuted the same year), Blanche Bradburry.
She was more the base performer alongside newcomers or other models that in a solo scene wouldn't sell well enough. I think in every thread she was present i gave her a vote, because she is either exceptional at the topic or competition wasn't strong enough. I hope she just finally got the appreciation she deserves.
backflipman wrote:I liked the whole idea and appreciate the work you put into that pronossstat thanks alot!
House MD wrote:Yeah like the Dellai sisters or July Sun (who historically has made very sparse videos these last couple years could not have been over-voted by duplicate accounts
This poll is a laugh... typical of 'democratic' soviet polls so why doesn't such practice not surprise me here
backflipman wrote:As for Rebecca Sharon... (...)
She was more the base performer alongside newcomers or other models that in a solo scene wouldn't sell well enough. I think in every thread she was present i gave her a vote, because she is either exceptional at the topic or competition wasn't strong enough. I hope she just finally got the appreciation she deserves.
dap-addict wrote:As for Rebecca Sharon... (...)
I do hope the same for her!
Still I think she's an example of either prono giving her sort of a forfeit by putting her in all or most additional polls or by something strange going on.
pronossstat wrote:Well, I've had enough of this circus for today let's do a quick update:
Francys Belle did great this day and is up by 4 positions.
Arwen Gold is in danger, Kristy Black and Jolee Love also can't relax.
pronossstat wrote:Well, I've had enough of this circus for today let's do a quick update:
Francys Belle did great this day and is up by 4 positions.
Arwen Gold is in danger, Kristy Black and Jolee Love also can't relax.
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:I am so impressed by your statistical, technical, and computer skills...
plajvaz wrote:@pronossstat: I want to give you kudos one more time. These polls are great and very interesting.
I must say it is really dissapointing to see this cheating with NiciXDream votes. Nici is very good performer with best vaginal skills (I have also voted for her in few polls). But, considering number of votes in all polls with NiciXDream and the way how these votes progressed over time, it is obvious there was voting fraud. Unfortunatelly, this didn't bring any good to NiciXDream and I also think that Nici's score is not valid and she should be disqualified from the competition.
plajvaz wrote:I have a suggestion, in order to avoid a similar cheaing in the last round:
Instead of creating one poll (or more polls) with top 10 girls, in which members will anonymously vote by checking one or more checkboxes (and each vote will be calculated as one point), you can organize voting like EuroSong voting system:
1. Select first 20 or 25 top ranked girls
2. Create just one standard topic (without creating poll) and list all these girls.
3. Each forum member can vote by giving points for exactly 10 girls in his post.
Points can be distributed like in EuroSong voting (12 - 10 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1) or you can use some other distribution system (for example, 15 - 12 - 10 - 8 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1).
With this approach, you will achieve two things:
1. You will eliminate fraud/cheating. Voting is transparent and you can ignore the votes from forum members that don't have at least 5 or 10 posts and/or from forum members that are registered just few days ago.
2. You will give forum members the possibility to rank their favorites. For example, in the Europe/Anal poll, I voted for five girls (so I gave each of them 1 point). But, the situation would be much closer to reality if I could assign a different number of points to each of these 5 girls. For example, in that case, I would give 5 points to Adeline Lafouine , 4 points to Sara Bell, 3 points to July Sun, etc... That would reflect my opinion much better.
What do you think about this idea?
Users browsing this forum: his_airness and 23 guests