xxx wrote:You can make a "classic LP" page if you want, with the right settings.
Ultra-Gape wrote:Incorrect tags is certainly an issue as mentioned. Playing about the new features yesterday I spotted a DAP scene labelled as 1 on 1 for example.
xxx wrote:And what studios are using wrong tags often? We will add something very harsh for them at some point in the future.
xxx wrote:What gay studios didn't tag their content as gay?
And what studios are using wrong tags often? We will add something very harsh for them at some point in the future.
xxx wrote:What gay studios didn't tag their content as gay?
And what studios are using wrong tags often? We will add something very harsh for them at some point in the future.
DPraved wrote:If tags are to be of any use we need to be able to report incorrect tags and when enough users have reported the same tag it should be removed from the scene and the producer notified.
Producers that continue to abuse incorrect tags then need to be penalised by the platform in some way to encourage correct usage in the future.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:DPraved wrote:If tags are to be of any use we need to be able to report incorrect tags and when enough users have reported the same tag it should be removed from the scene and the producer notified.
Producers that continue to abuse incorrect tags then need to be penalised by the platform in some way to encourage correct usage in the future.
I fully agree with this solution for the tags issue. XXX, one thing you know is that we can complain about things but @DPraved is at least proposing a solution to fix the issue that sounds reasonable to do.
xxx wrote:We have added a new tag for BTS : Behind the scenes (BTS) and will run some commands to auto flag as many scenes as possible.
xxx wrote:What gay studios didn't tag their content as gay?
xxx wrote:And what studios are using wrong tags often? We will add something very harsh for them at some point in the future.
xxx wrote:The new BTS tag just appeared (you may have to clear your cache with a control or shift refresh). 379 scenes found.
xxx wrote:The new BTS tag just appeared (you may have to clear your cache with a control or shift refresh). 379 scenes found.
Naaru wrote:>>> What would be great next, would be for studios to have to at the least just check in on the forums with some small regularity - I know some of the forum threads are terrible to read
but often there are some core viewers who are posting with genuinely reasonable and constructive feedback, but it often feels its screaming into the wind.
Ultra-Gape wrote:The BTS filter seems to be working well, thanks!
Looking through scene tags for this thread has made me think of one other change that may be a simple improvement to make: it would be far easier to check tags of a scene for specific content if the tags were displayed in alphabetical order.
xxx wrote:Ultra-Gape wrote:The BTS filter seems to be working well, thanks!
Looking through scene tags for this thread has made me think of one other change that may be a simple improvement to make: it would be far easier to check tags of a scene for specific content if the tags were displayed in alphabetical order.
You can sort them in alphabetical order already : "Select tags A-z Top" (top left of the box that pops up)
Naaru wrote:>>> What would be great next, would be for studios to have to at the least just check in on the forums with some small regularity - I know some of the forum threads are terrible to read but often there are some core viewers who are posting with genuinely reasonable and constructive feedback, but it often feels its screaming into the wind.
YumYum74 wrote:Same goes basically for the often abysmal naming of scenes (scenes often feature less or more guys than the title suggests, model names are horrifically butchered, overall bad spelling etc). Different issue altogether, but all in all these two issues combined at partially explain the many, many comments about how amateuristic and confusing the site looks these days. If people have to pay more than before, it’s not unreasonable to at least expect some kind of minimal standard under which a scene gets published. It would certainly help raise the overall customer experience…
magizi87 wrote:I can see where Ultra-Gape is coming from,
in regards to "too many tags"
but I think his perspective is short sighted.
MackZatis wrote:For tags to be of any use, while ALSO making less work for site admins & studios is to implement community tagging system.
Solves two problems, and benefits both parties.
Studios would provide ONLY the MOST BASIC tags to get it off the ground when scene is released. While also having systems in place to protect from RAMPANT misleading or outright lying when adding tags.
Then once a scene is released, community members can if they wish add tags. Not necessarly only those who bought the scene, but those who have spent x-amount $$$ in a period of time, much like the request or direct message system (which ever one uses that).
People who really enjoy using tags are MOST likely to add proper & ACCURATE tags.
Also I've seen tagging systems that allow users to "vote up" or "vote down" tags that are added.
It goes like this:
Tags added start with a base score of 8 out of 10 (every tag has it's own score), each "up vote" brings the score up 1 point. Each "down vote" brings the score down 1 point. Get it?
Should go with out saying, but because some people should be wearing helmets 24/7. You up vote accurate & proper tags, down vote improper/wrong tags. Maybe even add in a 3rd option of "misleading". That way if XXX is as good as his word on the subject, it makes identifying the habitual & repeat offenders easy, which equals less work trying to do so.
XXX You'd be very surprised how much of the "simple or mundane" tasks can be offloaded to a community, you just have to ALLOW US to HELP YOU. Since they're/we're are not here for financial gain, but only our own satisfaction. Having a properly functioning site thats easy to use only ADDS to that satisfaction.
magizi87 wrote:ANOTHER IDEA is to anchor tags to models.
For example, say Gonzo is about to release a scene with Mina,
by including MINA as part of the cast, in the upload process, the tags that describe her phisically, are automatically pulled into that scene.
This way, you can add the tags that describe Mina to her model page, once,
Like, Brunette, Slim waist, white girl, submissive, etc, etc,
and everytime you add the tag "MINA" to a scene, those tags are automatically added.
Saving time and boosting accuracy.
Ultra-Gape wrote:An interesting idea but wouldn't having a fairly incomplete list of tags when a scene first goes live potentially be a big issue for producers given the importance of early sales for their earnings?
Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote:
PUKE tag (153) still not working:
https://pornbox.com/application/niche/4158
TAG LIST: https://pornbox.com/application/niche/list
Scenes do also not show on a studio page or on a model's page in PornBox (so, you'll never know about these scenes existence if you not stumbled on it by luck on the forum because somebody talked about it/ or if you somehow know the title and fill that out in the PornBox search machine). viewtopic.php?f=68&t=43402
I believe that "Porn Box Bot" also doesn't advertise/promote these scenes in the girls threads on the forum.
xxx wrote:We have added a new tag for BTS : Behind the scenes (BTS) and will run some commands to auto flag as many scenes as possible.