vvvv84335 wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:vvvv84335 wrote:According to modern studies it has been suggested that modern homosapiens all originate from Africa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_Af ... ern_humans
Personally it doesn't bother me where we originate from, we're all the same race anyway. Why someone would care about skin color is beyond me. That kind of mind set is something we have thankfully evolved beyond.
These modern studies "Jane out of Africa" are not so modern any more. The truth is, no one has a clue. Still, they've served their social purpose.
Anything in the last 100 or so years is modern, and much of this scientific work has been done in the last 10-20 or so years. There is no "social purpose", it's science.
netzerkaiser wrote:vvvv84335 wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:These modern studies "Jane out of Africa" are not so modern any more. The truth is, no one has a clue. Still, they've served their social purpose.
Anything in the last 100 or so years is modern, and much of this scientific work has been done in the last 10-20 or so years. There is no "social purpose", it's science.
Sorry, I'll get back to you tomorrrow, when I've more time.
netzerkaiser wrote:
So you're thinking about girls getting pregnant when looking at porn? You're on a site that has mostly cocks rubbing against each other, no matter how much you try to convince yourself that isn't heterosexual x)
netzerkaiser wrote:Anything in the last 100 or so years is modern, and much of this scientific work has been done in the last 10-20 or so years. There is no "social purpose", it's science.
netzerkaiser wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/24/new-human-species-siberia
netzerkaiser wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/24/new-human-species-siberia
Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
netzerkaiser wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
Iddaoeek, its a very interesting area of discussion. We can start, & we can all learn... I give frst shout to this guy, I like his attitude, theres a dead-pan humour there I'm sure you'll appreciate...![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-SIB-_n1bg
Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
vvvv84335 wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
I'm only recently learning about the great civilization/empire that the Ethiopians had. The truth is sadly always the case of "history is written by the victors". We live in a world that is focused on directly or indirectly presenting the white western male as the more civilized and evolved being. Sometimes I think even animals are more civilized than us, since we as a species are the most destructive.
vvvv84335 wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
I'm only recently learning about the great civilization/empire that the Ethiopians had. The truth is sadly always the case of "history is written by the victors". We live in a world that is focused on directly or indirectly presenting the white western male as the more civilized and evolved being. Sometimes I think even animals are more civilized than us, since we as a species are the most destructive.
netzerkaiser wrote:vvvv84335 wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:It's science, you go by evidence. There's overwhelming evidence to suggest humans evolved first in what we now call Africa. I'm really not sure why anyone, other than a creationist of some description, would have a problem with this theory. The article you posted is about a hitherto unknown human ancestor which may have lived 30 to 48 thousand years ago, later on the same article talks about the first humans migrating from Africa to Eurasia 1.9 million years ago.
I'm only recently learning about the great civilization/empire that the Ethiopians had. The truth is sadly always the case of "history is written by the victors". We live in a world that is focused on directly or indirectly presenting the white western male as the more civilized and evolved being. Sometimes I think even animals are more civilized than us, since we as a species are the most destructive.
Brother, this is ONE OF THE BIG QUESTIONS.
Were the Ancient Eqyptians even Eypytians?
https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-hi ... red-005812
I work with Lithuanian GENTLEMAN who is staggered that 'descendants' of pyramid builders can't nail a hotel door together...
LOFL.
Sad but true.
Joanna has written over 1,000 articles for Ancient Origins, some of which have been mentioned in the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, The Guardian, The Times, Spiegel and The Daily Mail
Dr. Davey is convinced that there were fair-haired Egyptians, but believes that the fair-haired mummies are just very rare
People with albinism often have white or very light blonde hair, although some have brown or ginger hair. The exact colour depends on how much melanin their body produces.
Iddaoeeok wrote:So some ancient Egyptians had red/fair hair - big deal, you get red/fair haired people all over the middle east.
The longstanding controversy about the ancient Egyptians used to be about whether they were actually black! It seems most likely that ancient Egypt was multiracial. Much like how the Roman Empire was made up of all sorts of "nationalities" and ethnicities.
vvvv84335 wrote:I'm only recently learning about the great civilization/empire that the Ethiopians had
vvvv84335 wrote:Anyway, I really like the girl in your profile pic. Did she ever do any DAP/DPP?
poldijk wrote:this thread is going in every direction, if I was zbyszko.pl, I would say stop!
but he can't....4 posts in 5years, an average of less than 1 post per year (half of it to complain about gay), next one will be in 2023![]()
DAP! please update, oh sorry, you're in online detox again, you will have fun when you will come back
vvvv84335 wrote:I'm only recently learning about the great civilization/empire that the Ethiopians had
no, I will not say "plz stop going into ethiopian gay scene!"
I can be smart sometimes![]()
I love his songs, his energy to talk about injustice, read books about him, know his life and his relation with Haïlé Sélassié, the complex ethiopian story, just...vvvv84335 wrote:Anyway, I really like the girl in your profile pic. Did she ever do any DAP/DPP?
vvvv84335, do you think you're in .... a porn forum or what?![]()
![]()
if you're talking about Netzerkaiser's profile pic, the answer is no, she is a private girl from the 2000's, I did some pic's mosaic of her here, but she is a vey beautiful redhead girl anyway
vvvv84335 wrote:I'm thinking of Ehtiopia before Haile Selassie aka His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah, Elect of God, Light of the Universe (yes that was seriously his full title from 1930-1974)
poldijk wrote:vvvv84335 wrote:I'm thinking of Ehtiopia before Haile Selassie aka His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah, Elect of God, Light of the Universe (yes that was seriously his full title from 1930-1974)
yes, that's why I said the complex story of Ethiopia....not really fan of kings, we're celebrating today the fall of the french one
vvvv84335 wrote:Well, we have a lot of kings in Europe. They are thankfully only symbolic for the most part and don't any actual power.
Iddaoeeok wrote:The monarch in the UK does - and don't let them tell you otherwise.
Iddaoeeok wrote:The monarch in the UK does - and don't let them tell you otherwise.
poldijk wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:The monarch in the UK does - and don't let them tell you otherwise.
I heard the queen was not allowed to tell what she thinks about the brexit? to stay "neutral"?
Ultra-Gape wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:The monarch in the UK does - and don't let them tell you otherwise.
Erm, go on then. How has Queen Elizabeth II changed the course of UK politics over let's say the last 5 years?
(For context I am English.)
This is the most random thread I've every seen here and I have precisely zero idea how we got from gay porn to the above point!
Iddaoeeok wrote:Ultra-Gape wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:The monarch in the UK does - and don't let them tell you otherwise.
Erm, go on then. How has Queen Elizabeth II changed the course of UK politics over let's say the last 5 years?
(For context I am English.)
This is the most random thread I've every seen here and I have precisely zero idea how we got from gay porn to the above point!
She hasn't but she could, she has multiple powers that far outstrip any equivalent European monarch:
The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements.
The people of the UK or, to given them their official status, her subjects should therefore be grateful that she's a tedious drone with no imagination and that her awful family seem happy enough to live their pampered lives sponging off the British taxpayer,
Iddaoeeok wrote:She hasn't but she could, she has multiple powers that far outstrip any equivalent European monarch:
The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements.
The people of the UK or, to given them their official status, her subjects should therefore be grateful that she's a tedious drone with no imagination and that her awful family seem happy enough to live their pampered lives sponging off the British taxpayer,
Ultra-Gape wrote:This is the most random thread I've every seen here and I have precisely zero idea how we got from gay porn to the above point!
poldijk wrote:Ultra-Gape wrote:This is the most random thread I've every seen here and I have precisely zero idea how we got from gay porn to the above point!
july is hot, moreover, the heat wave is coming, our brains are in fusion![]()
let me explain you how I see the evolution of this thread:
it is a teamwork![]()
everything was going fine until Trump arrived![]()
- then, netzerkaiser started to talk about migrant (I think netzerkaiser is THE manager of this big mess)
- and Iddaoeeok added some japan touch in the migrant discussion
- a stupid guy put a pixelated gay scene (by thinking it was right in topic)
- netzerkaiser continued with indigenous people, indigenous/africa/ethiopia, Haile Selassie, ofc Bob Marley had to join the party
- king, july 14 in France...the logic was to talk about Queen Elizabeth II
- until timdiablo arrived to complain about Crystal Thayer and her/his friend because gay men are not doing enough 6on1 compared to trans models.
timdiablo , you're completely out of topic, this thread is to complain about gay content !!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
we are the only ones able to understand this picture frame....other people will say it's crazy
netzerkaiser wrote:In my defence, Sire, I was intoxicated, so please bear that into account when assessing my culpability.
poldijk wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:In my defence, Sire, I was intoxicated, so please bear that into account when assessing my culpability.
![]()
I will discuss with zbyszko and the vagatrumpster family to see if this intoxication can lighten your sentence after wrecking this beautiful thread
netzerkaiser wrote:poldijk wrote:netzerkaiser wrote:In my defence, Sire, I was intoxicated, so please bear that into account when assessing my culpability.
![]()
I will discuss with zbyszko and the vagatrumpster family to see if this intoxication can lighten your sentence after wrecking this beautiful thread
LOL, Thank you Sire! PS: did you ever see this great movie based on pre-Revolutionary France?
I'll bet that Ben Whishaw lad would get some pulses racing here:
Oh sugar, have I done it again, new rabbit hole? Never mind.
Life is life. I love this site, & so many contributers...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSMPDI_bc_w
Users browsing this forum: Alan2008, Google [Bot] and 40 guests