sumacs3 wrote:1. Can anyone explain why in the Wendy (Muller) casting scene, Wendy asks his female translator to leave when Wendy begins to strip? Do other models do this? Is that a common thing? Or is this evidence she knows the whole plot? This was a pivotal moment.
2. Wendy is from Latvia, and so why is it filmed in Moscow? That would mean a special trip for her to a different country, just to do some fashion work? This seems odd. Do all the girls come from agencies, or might she have been vacationing in Russia and he invited her to his place? But a stranger? Most people did not have smartphones back then (2008).
3. In the later WUNF scene with her, PW thanks her at one point saying how he loves Russian girls! Is that a mistake on PW's part, or do you think she is Russian? I was a subscriber to Mia Mayblack at OF, who was also with PW, and she said that "Wendy" was from Latvia, as Mia was.
4. People speak of a hidden camera. But it looks like he zooms it in and out during the interview. Would she not detect this? Another mysterious thing.
5. She has her period and he does anal and things are all fine-looking!
I would like real evidence about what is fake!
Like a previous pattern.
Not simply some bold unproven statements.
Thanks.
Panorama wrote: You, me, and everyone else ESPECIALLY his followers have all been duped into believing his castings are real when in actual fact they are not. Every moan, scream, and orgasm is a well-paid fake.
This is the real reason why so many models would not talk to me about Woodman, not because of their trauma but because they were PAID to keep quiet!!
Sorry to burst your "genuine" bubble about Wendy sumacs, but what I've found out over the last few weeks, has made the scam artist that is Pierre Woodman become much easier to see when you look at the whole "casting" scene logically.
sumacs3 wrote:In short, I have ignored the Background because I was overwhelmed by the Foreground.
The fact that girls come from agencies that cater specifically to erotic models is something I had not considered, and then the fact that the girls already know what is expected of them is certainly, as you say, a bubble burster!
BlueShadow wrote:
ValenciaCF wrote:He didn't know Marsianna amoon was a tornado on legs .He never do his research. Lolololol
Panorama wrote:No problem sumacs. Just remember everything you SEE in a woodman "Casting" has been previously discussed, by models, agencies, and Woodman himself. EVERYTHING has been agreed and NOTHING is spontaneous.
All the stories of getting models to sign AFTER a "secret" filming is a lie, that's NOT how things work. END OF STORY.
Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote:Panorama wrote:No problem sumacs. Just remember everything you SEE in a woodman "Casting" has been previously discussed, by models, agencies, and Woodman himself. EVERYTHING has been agreed and NOTHING is spontaneous.
All the stories of getting models to sign AFTER a "secret" filming is a lie, that's NOT how things work. END OF STORY.
Well, isn't that a turn of events...so, what now, topic closed since all is legit and everything has been agreed beforehand between gerbier and the models?
I'm pretty sure Ricardo, Robin Reid, Dan Leal, Lana Rhoades, Juliana Grandi, Rocco Siffredi, Josephine Jackson, Serenity Haze and many many others could educate you a little bit more than what you already should have known being active in this topic for so long now, on how pierre andre nicolas gerbier operates during the pre-shooting e-mail/phone/social media/dinner phase and on set.....
viewtopic.php?f=184&t=13567&p=637347#p637347
The bottomline and almost sole existence of this topic is that what you said is exactly NOT the way gerbier tends to handle. This has been discussed ad infinitum. So either your account has been hacked or I'm lost as to what in earth you're talking about.
BlueShadow wrote:
And surely Stacy Bloom will also have her reasons for saying she wants nothing more to do with that man.
http://imgur.com/a/MUMkBOD
Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote: Well, isn't that a turn of events...so, what now, topic closed since all is legit and everything has been agreed beforehand between gerbier and the models?
I'm pretty sure Ricardo, Robin Reid, Dan Leal, Lana Rhoades, Juliana Grandi, Rocco Siffredi, Josephine Jackson, Serenity Haze and many many others could educate you a little bit more than what you already should have known being active in this topic for so long now, on how pierre andre nicolas gerbier operates during the pre-shooting e-mail/phone/social media/dinner phase and on set.....
viewtopic.php?f=184&t=13567&p=637347#p637347
The bottomline and almost sole existence of this topic is that what you said is exactly NOT the way gerbier tends to handle. This has been discussed ad infinitum. So either your account has been hacked or I'm lost as to what in earth you're talking about.
Santorum sundae wrote:so did he end up posting any clips from the 25 scenes?
Panorama wrote:Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote: Well, isn't that a turn of events...so, what now, topic closed since all is legit and everything has been agreed beforehand between gerbier and the models?
I'm pretty sure Ricardo, Robin Reid, Dan Leal, Lana Rhoades, Juliana Grandi, Rocco Siffredi, Josephine Jackson, Serenity Haze and many many others could educate you a little bit more than what you already should have known being active in this topic for so long now, on how pierre andre nicolas gerbier operates during the pre-shooting e-mail/phone/social media/dinner phase and on set.....
viewtopic.php?f=184&t=13567&p=637347#p637347
The bottomline and almost sole existence of this topic is that what you said is exactly NOT the way gerbier tends to handle. This has been discussed ad infinitum. So either your account has been hacked or I'm lost as to what in earth you're talking about.
What I'm saying Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p is that my original view of Woodman was based on what I saw with my own eyes and from what I heard from other people. I've spent the last year and a half trying to get a model who has actually BEEN to visit Woodman to tell me honestly what she experienced with him. Up until a few weeks ago, I had absolutely '0' success with this. Although I've always had my assumptions about him there have always been sticking points for me about some of the "castings". Such as why have so many women refused to sign the release forms? Why have so many not let Woodman show their initiations? Why does Woodman appear to have ESP by zooming in on a model just at the right time? Why do so many models with boyfriends suddenly want to fuck a fat, ugly, Frenchman behind their boyfriend's backs? Why have none of those boyfriends kicked the living shit out of Woodman? Why do so many "first-time" models who hate sperm suddenly love Woodmans?? The list goes on and on.
Well, speaking to this model and one she put me in touch with (who he still hasn't shown any clips for by the way) over a period of several days has opened my eyes to what actually goes off at one of his "castings". I applied everything she said to me to some of the questions posed above, and you know what, it all made sense.
Don't get me wrong, Woodman is as bad as everyone makes out, even I've seen his Serenity Haze video where he tries to show how innocent he is, but instead proves the opposite when she tells him to STOP but he just keeps on going.
His bigoted remarks about gays and black people, and of course not forgetting his admiration for Vladimir Putin. I'm sure there are many other instances where Woodman has actually broken the law, and I know that's why he cannot travel to certain countries. But I'm here as an outsider. I'm not in the industry and none of my thoughts or views are polarized by professional jealousy and contempt which I think is quite evident here. Many of the accusations placed at Woodman's doors have NEVER been acted upon by anyone (in the industry) here suggesting that they cannot actually prove anything. Even today on his site he's claiming victory AGAIN over WGCZ (or whoever) Suggesting that the vast majority of what is said ON BOTH FORUMS is inter-business mud-slinging.
All the accusations about models being held against their will, blackmailed, drugged, etc have never gone to court, and Woodman has never been charged. Woodman lives in EUROPE, he could be tried in any European court for all the crimes he has been accused of but has he? No. I'm sure Woodman will immediately post that on his site as another clear victory for himself but he really shouldn't because he wouldn't want his loyal followers to know what I now know about their "Master".
Woodman is a con artist. He's been hiring models for years paying big money to get them to do his castings. They know EVERYTHING about what's going off because it's all in the agreement they sign BEFORE the casting. The models who "refused to sign" the release? It's bullshit, the castings never took place, in the first place, Woodman PAYS THEM to allow him to say that they were "initiated" by him and to keep their mouths shut when talking to guys like me. Even his glorious sister Gabriella, the initiation that she won't allow to be shown because it was a "private thing" between her and Woodman, never happened. You are ALL being lied to Woodman members! You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that a very attractive 18-year-old woman is not going to want a nearly 60-year-old, out-of-shape fat guy sweating all over her no matter how good he is at sodomy unless you are being paid BIG MONEY!
So I've changed my tune? Yes, I believed Woodman was an ass-hole for one set of reasons, and now I believe he's an ass-hole for another set because I've found a whole bunch of missing pieces in my puzzle. Does it make him better? No. because he's still a liar, a cheat, and he's been smearing models' good names by implying that he's done things to them that he most certainly HAS NOT. I'm also sure that he has been pressuring and manipulating models for years into doing things that they didn't necessarily want to do. But I'm now more willing to believe that most of the models who I believed were victimized by Woodman were actually more complicit than we were all led to believe.
Panorama wrote:Santorum sundae wrote:so did he end up posting any clips from the 25 scenes?
........ And no he didn't Santorum. But are we surprised?
robin_reid wrote:BlueShadow wrote:
And surely Stacy Bloom will also have her reasons for saying she wants nothing more to do with that man.
http://imgur.com/a/MUMkBOD
Who knows what this bastard did to her. Like 99% of models, she doesn't want to see him anymore in her life, and the other 1% wants to see him just for the extra money he pays, dinners at expensive restaurants and prostitution.
dap-addict wrote:Would it maybe have been enough to leave it with Robins hint and not feed lier APE's EGO by all your posts?
dap-addict wrote:Blue or Panorama, do you have an actual list of lier APE fake accounts of his forum?
Forum users he is hiding behind.
Some are easily detectible from language, but some are more difficult, better mimicry so to say.
If its too many to name vulgos A to L would be enough for me.
Thanks!
sumacs3 wrote:I was chatting with a guy who was driving a low-powered Porsche and I asked him how fast it could go.
He replied, "It's all about Image."
In 1987 the Porsche 944 was available with a 160 hp engine.
BlueShadow wrote:Yes of course, called her after he saw her on LP/AV. Sure, busy doing her anal and DP with GG.
But when she goes to Budapest in September, he can always write sweet angel, tornado with leg...look how she enjoining anal for the first time and bullshit like that.
PS
Save this post.
Panorama wrote:BlueShadow wrote:Yes of course, called her after he saw her on LP/AV. Sure, busy doing her anal and DP with GG.
But when she goes to Budapest in September, he can always write sweet angel, tornado with leg...look how she enjoining anal for the first time and bullshit like that.
PS
Save this post.
Don't worry Blue, I don't think he's going to get his dirty hands on this one.
BlueShadow wrote:Yes of course, called her after he saw her on LP/AV.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests