BlueShadow wrote:Please, someone can ask them directly? Maybe they can fix this and they will start to retweet his works. They are loosing advertisement from this great producer.
Or maybe they will also answer what PW says about some girls being sent there and doing things they werent' supposed to do. Or even some clarification about that girl being ''aggressive'' and not getting paid. Since these are things that he said on public forum for everyone to see, (nothing private, since he like to talk), maybe they want to answer publicly and about how exactly work a professional shooting by a professional producer as PW is.
Panorama wrote:I would normally feel sorry for someone who has been (in my view) obviously abused in earlier life being taken advantage of by not only some very clever models (I would REALLY LOVE to know who spat at him!) but also his closest "friends". But in Pierre Woodman's case, he has taken that abuse and turned it on unsuspecting young women and for that, I cannot feel sorry for him.
Visionary_sight wrote:I’m new too this. You guys have done a great investigative job regarding PW. My first awareness of him was when Caylian Curtis first emerged. She was heavily promoted and she only released one hardcore scene and that took a while to get released and the scene itself wasn’t anything special. However, then apparently he had a photo set of her doing dp. He eventually released this, but to this day that video for that doesn’t exist. I seriously doubt that. He probably keeps it to himself.
The other thing was his appearance on Theroux’s documentary. It was odd. The grandfather reveal was strange. It was like he was extremely proud of a special method that has been passed down the generations. And this claim was a full proof reason why girls should shoot anal with him. In reality, it’s just a con and isn’t a valid reason to do this with him. The claim itself if true is as Robin has said, criminal. Not something to be proud or share on broadcast.
He had a run in with Zlata Shine. Apparently, they arranged a meeting and she came but rejected him straightaway, then afterwards he goes to his forum and starts bad mouthing her. Saying she will not go far and in real life she is not attractive.
That’s clearly not the case. She’s gorgeous. Other members on this thread started arguing with him about not making nasty comments on a girls face. In the end he had to close the page down.
For me I don’t like his casting style. Visually it looks rubbish. And let’s be honest. Why would any young girl want to shoot in those conditions? In a dark and murky place with a man who looks like a creep and judging by his tv appearance he’s clearly arrogant and a bully. I can’t see a future for his work. Time has moved on. Nobody wants to see shoddy scenes.
Visionary_sight wrote:He had a run in with Zlata Shine. Apparently, they arranged a meeting and she came but rejected him straightaway, then afterwards he goes to his forum and starts bad mouthing her. Saying she will not go far and in real life she is not attractive.
That’s clearly not the case. She’s gorgeous. Other members on this thread started arguing with him about not making nasty comments on a girls face. In the end he had to close the page down.
BlueShadow wrote:Visionary_sight wrote:He had a run in with Zlata Shine. Apparently, they arranged a meeting and she came but rejected him straightaway, then afterwards he goes to his forum and starts bad mouthing her. Saying she will not go far and in real life she is not attractive.
That’s clearly not the case. She’s gorgeous. Other members on this thread started arguing with him about not making nasty comments on a girls face. In the end he had to close the page down.
Of course, who seriously believes that shit? Do you think that if he had the opportunity he would not have had sex with her? He has "worked" with girls much less attractive...
But some girls have some standards , others want the money and will do anything.
Visionary_sight wrote:I’m new too this. You guys have done a great investigative job regarding PW. My first awareness of him was when Caylian Curtis first emerged. She was heavily promoted and she only released one hardcore scene and that took a while to get released and the scene itself wasn’t anything special. However, then apparently he had a photo set of her doing dp. He eventually released this, but to this day that video for that doesn’t exist. I seriously doubt that. He probably keeps it to himself.
The other thing was his appearance on Theroux’s documentary. It was odd. The grandfather reveal was strange. It was like he was extremely proud of a special method that has been passed down the generations. And this claim was a full proof reason why girls should shoot anal with him. In reality, it’s just a con and isn’t a valid reason to do this with him. The claim itself if true is as Robin has said, criminal. Not something to be proud or share on broadcast.
He had a run in with Zlata Shine. Apparently, they arranged a meeting and she came but rejected him straightaway, then afterwards he goes to his forum and starts bad mouthing her. Saying she will not go far and in real life she is not attractive.
That’s clearly not the case. She’s gorgeous. Other members on this thread started arguing with him about not making nasty comments on a girls face. In the end he had to close the page down.
For me I don’t like his casting style. Visually it looks rubbish. And let’s be honest. Why would any young girl want to shoot in those conditions? In a dark and murky place with a man who looks like a creep and judging by his tv appearance he’s clearly arrogant and a bully. I can’t see a future for his work. Time has moved on. Nobody wants to see shoddy scenes.
in Budapest is ''protected'' and no one is interested in seriously investigate certain behaviors
Panorama wrote:Unfortunately, much of our investigative exploration (in my case) is hindered greatly by my own lack of knowledge about the hardcore world and the apparent "wall of silence" that exists within it.Visionary_sight wrote:I’m new too this. You guys have done a great investigative job regarding PW.
Panorama wrote:On a side note: Can anyone tell me, when a pornstar has a blood test do they get a certificate that has a validity period? Like it covers you to have sex with Bob on Monday, and then Mary, Pete, and Jimmy in a threesome the week after etc? Or does that certificate only clear them for one scene with a particular partner(s) and then if they want to do more scenes they have to do another test? Also, can you get a blood test on a weekend or is it a 9-5 Monday to Friday thing?
dap-addict wrote:Panorama wrote:Unfortunately, much of our investigative exploration (in my case) is hindered greatly by my own lack of knowledge about the hardcore world and the apparent "wall of silence" that exists within it.Visionary_sight wrote:I’m new too this. You guys have done a great investigative job regarding PW.
Hey, you both are nice, but did you read really back?
Core is, its not about hardcore porn with lier APE's work since more than 10y already. His website is just covering up another main interest. He just pretends to want the girls to shoot porn, he actually does it to some extent, but main biz and income is somewhere else.
This said ofc he can also be nice and charming with some girls. And few girls only shoot hardcore scenes for him and its all fine and they even can work for other studios as well, but its all made-up for his do-as-if, its still not his interest anymore to shoot porn.
Test in porn (blood and urine) has a validity period of 14 days, counting since the extraction day. I attached you a sample recent test I did: april 06 the day of extraction, válido hasta (valid until) april 19, on april 20 the test is already expired. Performers doesn’t do a new test for every new shooting, rule is 14 days for everyone. About test in weekend it depends of the lab… Here in Spain for years in our porn lab it was only from monday to friday but now we can also pass test on Saturday.
This guy is finished
Panorama wrote:For me, it's important that we continue to warn young inexperienced models about the devil that is Pierre Woodman, I've managed to stop 4 from seeing him
Visionary_sight wrote:Yes Panorama, that makes sense regarding release forms. And then what he manipulatively says to his members concerninh the scenes.
ValenciaCF wrote:This is Woodman...he calls himself professional but hates working with professional girls because he knows they will not tolerate his illegal and improper bullshit that he do with naive girls on his set.
BlueShadow wrote:PPS
He moralizes when a girl at 13 years old watch porn but it is ok to say in an interview that his grandfather talked to him about anal sex when he was a kid.
This is PW... and they are not ashamed to send models there (if we can call them like that) or maybe they're ashamed, since they never mention him, but at least the money comes in handy)
dap-addict wrote:+ 1
Thats a really worthwhile initiative of you.
Alternatively girls can get briefed and warned before they go to meet him, but thats a kind of roulette still.
Finally I talked with trusted models who claim he was professional on set when actually shooting. Its rather all the dinners and interviews etc. that are the problem. For really strong and life experienced models he may be no harm. But usually he preys for other models.
Panorama wrote: I was speaking to one young lady only last week who I tried to warn about him, but she confirmed that she'd already seen him that week and she had a great time. If he had treated EVERY model with that respect this forum wouldn't be here and it certainly WOULDN'T be 73 pages long!!
Panorama wrote:With regard to your comment about Woodman's grandfather Visionary talking to him about anal sex. If you watch Woodman's castings he tells the models that he HAS TO SHOW THEM the sexual technique. I'm pretty sure that this was taught (practically) to Woodman when he was a child as he said. If you've ever had anal sex with a woman while stimulating her G-spot you'll know that you have to feel for her Skene glands (similar to our prostate) in order to make her go off like a rocket. You can't just point at it because it's inside. To show Woodman what to do (and I hate having to say this) his grandfather would have had to physically show him!! Anyone watching that BBC documentary (around 65 million in the U.K. alone) would have known that, and indeed Louis Theroux's face just about said everything we ALL were thinking. While his grandfather obviously taught him very well about the practical side of the abuse he also did a great job making normality out of
all the lies and deceit surrounding it too. Normally, that would be a tragedy to know the young lad went through stuff like that, but when you see what kind of man turned out 30 years later, right or wrong, it's not acceptable to inflict that suffered by yourself on others. (That's my opinion by the way it's not necessarily a fact)
BlueShadow wrote:Yes, but in that case you should have asked if she will do other anal/DP, if she has a regular exclusivity contract with him (which I doubt) if everything she did was agreed before the shooting and if she knew what kind of shooting it was, number of guys etc.
Many, believe me, are vague (or because they are ashamed, or they have understood that it is not a professional thing, or they want to protect the agency they work for, or they don't want to reveal the lies he tell about some, clearly, staged casting).
Panorama wrote:BlueShadow wrote:Yes, but in that case you should have asked if she will do other anal/DP, if she has a regular exclusivity contract with him (which I doubt) if everything she did was agreed before the shooting and if she knew what kind of shooting it was, number of guys etc.
Many, believe me, are vague (or because they are ashamed, or they have understood that it is not a professional thing, or they want to protect the agency they work for, or they don't want to reveal the lies he tell about some, clearly, staged casting).
To be honest Blue, I was willing to take the woman at her word. If she has a regular contract or not is really no business of mine. If she's tried the wine and she liked it, no convincing by me is going to make her dislike it. I don't mind if models say Woodman was fine with them, there is no doubt that the man is bad news but the fact will be that some models will like working with him and we should accept that. If we can accept that some models do/will like working with Woodman it makes us better than him because we're being honest. That's what I try to project when I talk with these women, they're not stupid and can see exaggerations a mile away.
I've found in my short time talking with them that the models fall into four groups (1) just don't answer you and have already turned off comments on their social media. (2) Have no clue who he is and are interested in what information and evidence you have and then decide for themselves. (3) Already know about Woodman and have told or have been told by their agencies that they do not wish to meet with him. (4) Models who have already met Woodman and either will or won't be seeing him again. For me, I'm only interested in models in group (2) because they are the ones willing to listen. I'm not pestering them which is just going to make them do the opposite of what I'm trying to show them. It's worked for me four times already, that's four models saved from that monster so I'm just going to keep doing what I'm doing. Believe me if I could stand outside his cheap hotels and physically stop them from going in there I would, but you can only lead a horse to water and all that.
ValenciaCF wrote:About the lab tests in porn. I know it's 14 days but it really means putting your trust in a performer to be safe outside of work. Everyone says they are safe but they are actually not. You can show a perfomer the test and do the scene and maybe next day you are scheduled to do another scene with abother performer...BUT..if that person goes home and has unprotected sex with some stranger at home and they lick up a disease. The next day that same lerformwr is going to infect someone else. So in porn it really means blindly putting your trust in colleagues to do the right thing outside of work. The test shows a performer is free from disease amd its valid for 14 days, but what happens inbetween those 14days of theu are irresponsible when you are not on set, nobody knows...and there can still be repercussions for other performers
Panorama wrote:That actually sounds quite worrying Robin, basically, you're saying that a lot of your profession is based on TRUST as there is no real-time way of telling if someone has an STD. I guess that's not something many people think about when they're watching their favourite porn star!
Visionary_sight wrote:Panorama. Spot on. You took the words out my mouth. All he’s doing is digging his own hole with all his contradictions and inaccuracies with the comments he keeps coming out with.
Blue. How do you manage to find all these comments? Some are dated back to 2009. Great work exposing his claims!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest