rakdobi wrote:edited (full post above)...
rakdobi wrote:I prefer one Rough/Degrading/Struggle scene with Ella than 10 soft and boring scenes.
Not much of a business model though is it? NRX is trying to run his studio as a viable, civilized business, not a hit-and-run.
simone.urbinati wrote:rakdobi wrote:I prefer one Rough/Degrading/Struggle scene with Ella than 10 soft and boring scenes.
+1
10on1 rought anal, do, dap, TP, balls anal very deeeeep and swallow a lot of sperm...
I refer you to the Simpsons meme above.
civilized business? Then open a cake shop instead.[/quote]
'Civilized' is ultimately the precondition for 'viable'. Clearly I don't intend 'civilized' in this context to mean 'twee' or 'genteel'.
Eg.
If NRX were to run debut performers into the ground and lose them after a only single scene, then he would have to scout a brand new model for every scene (= not viable).
Similarly, if he were to skip scouting and source a performer from an agency and run that new performer into the ground so she left the industry immediately afterwards, not he would lose that model after a single scene, but you can also be pretty certain that the agency involved would not only refuse to send further performers (if a model leaves the business that means they lose future agency fees), but they would also spread the word within the industry that his production company was not to be trusted with new performers (= not viable).
The bottom line is that if Nick NRX can scout a new performer, build a positive and trusting working relationship with her, and shoot 10 decent scenes with a new performer that will all sell (others want to buy them, even if you don't), why would he opt instead to trash all that preparatory effort and 10 sales, in order to sell a single scene and then have to start from scratch?
Nick NRX did his best. Ella did her best. We have what we have. Many were happy with that, even if it didn't last.
If you are disappointed with the results, well that happens sometimes (try another performer or another studio?).
But the TL/DR is that trashing performers is bad ethically and bad financially. Fine for a fantasy, but it's not business.
dap-addict wrote:This is the reason you need to go for it all while they're in the studio. The whole "go slow" nonsense is just that.
exactly! That's why the first scene should already be Manhandle.
And from there raise the bar as much as possible.[/quote]
Its upon a good scout like Nick Rock to feel what suits a girl and from where to begin. Manhandle anal can be a starting point, but it doesnt suit all girls for sure.
Important is to get to envelope pushing options like manhandle, wet and DAP pretty fast, I'd say 2nd or 3rd scene as a rule, but sometimes its possible only in 4th or 5th porn scene in my experience. Waiting longer is usually not a viable option, at least not with Russian girls for sure.[/quote]
With respect to your opinion, what you mean is
"Important *TO YOU*" .
Speaking personally (and I am not the only one who says this), I'm actually more than happy to pay to see those performers I love going no further than great DPs.
And it's often when performers move from that core skill they have perfected, and into the heavier/pissier/DAP content, that quality drops off, because they are both out of their depth and experience skillset, and (sadly) don't always appear to be happy doing so.
Their performance and passion seems dulled in those situations (understandably in my view) and the excitement is lost.
That is my personal view. Clearly others want/expect heavier content, and there are great models here who are more than up to offering that to a high standard.
But I think this 'template' of progression for new performers is probably far more representative of your personal preferences as a viewer (which you are entitled to hold, and good luck to you in your quest!) than the broader view, by which I mean those here not so fixated on certain acts or so demanding of a certain pace of progression.
Blah blah blah...