Panorama wrote:
I agree with you to some extent Eloise. As I said back in my introduction back on page 32, some of the name-calling and unproven evidence not only here but on other forums doesn't do anything to harm PW it just makes threads like this unbelievable, which is not what the guys here are trying to achieve I'm sure. Like I said back in my aforementioned introduction, I don't think PW is a rapist or has done anything (as far as I know) illegal. But he's certainly not what he makes out to be, and he's certainly not a nice guy. From my very short investigation into him that I've done, I was able to establish that he's not a nice guy, as I'm sure others can do so also. The thread needs someone who has worked with him or has strong evidence that can stand up and say he does this, or he does that. The only hard evidence that I've found in either his own words which cannot be denied or actions are :
1) He refers to black people as N###ers. Not a great standpoint from someone who says's they aren't racist. (Melissa A video)
2) He gives very rough hard sex including anal to Virgins (if they are indeed virgins)
3) He swears at girls in French when he knows they can't understand him.
4) He coerces women into cheating on their boyfriends/husbands.
5) The "Jitka" story - just the whole thing is wrong.
All the above mentioned I can stand behind, and tell me to a greater extent this is not a nice guy. But I think his "sister" Gabrielle Techeken is just as much to blame and nowhere near as chastised because she's been the beauty hiding in front of the beast and helping to pull girls into his web.
Finally, the girls themselves must take responsibility for their own actions, they can just leave as I think Bijou did and a few others, but most don't. But yes, I agree with you, this thread so far - from an outsiders point of view makes the notoriety of PW more attractive than any "real" evidence that is found here.
Just my thought.
dap-addict wrote:Panorama wrote:Hi
Is there someone here who worked for PW?
Is this a troll question?!
You can see some here are very well informed, publishing evidence only insiders can know. There was more of that from first hand but it got deleted I see now. Might be due to lawsuits by the big EGO white knight of porn.
But again, if only 1 girl doenst fall into his lier APE spider web, mission is completed.
And right, girls are responsible for themselves, but if they can't even trust their agent anymore what a fucked up place must former Europorn capital Budapest (1990-2000) have become meanwhile.
Panorama wrote:All the above mentioned I can stand behind, and tell me to a greater extent this is not a nice guy. But I think his "sister" Gabrielle Techeken is just as much to blame and nowhere near as chastised because she's been the beauty hiding in front of the beast and helping to pull girls into his web.
Just my thought.
BlueShadow wrote:1# post: Brilldogs, agency in BP, publicly criticized (on eurobabeindex) PW's way of working years ago... Now they (Brilldogs!) is his (PW!) best partner. What money can do...
2# the post I quoted is more than enough for reference.
Mia Trejsi's post on IG (which I have posted) shows exactly how her assistance plays a key role.
3# what is there to explain? In the screen you can see the name of the model they (the members! on his (PW!) forum) asking about...it is clear that I am referring to the scenes released on that model.
Just check it, only 2 scenes released, the rest is just teasing for catching members.
I say this because when his "sister" was interviewed she said that she didn't want her own casting showing because it was "private and not for public viewing". I know of at least three other women (including Eufrat) who used the EXACT same wording when they were asked by PW why they wouldn't sign the release. Maybe she knew the only way to really hurt him was to hit him in the pocket and his ego by telling them to do this. That would be the only respect I would have for her.
On the flip side, if it was indeed PW who told them that they could refuse (I'm sorry I don't know if it's a legal requirement to do that for managers?) then although I still don't like the guy, I'd have to at least give him that.
Mister Ananas wrote:You are describing the way Woodman operates, not necessarily the industry as a whole. Agents enable him and are part of the problem, but some agents are good and some are not, so there is no uniform standard of behavior across the board. It is most accurate to say that porn, as an activity which operates on the “fringes” of mainstream society, attracts bad people at a higher-than-usual rate, but not everyone in porn is bad, and (I would venture to say) most of us are not.I say this because when his "sister" was interviewed she said that she didn't want her own casting showing because it was "private and not for public viewing". I know of at least three other women (including Eufrat) who used the EXACT same wording when they were asked by PW why they wouldn't sign the release. Maybe she knew the only way to really hurt him was to hit him in the pocket and his ego by telling them to do this. That would be the only respect I would have for her.
On the flip side, if it was indeed PW who told them that they could refuse (I'm sorry I don't know if it's a legal requirement to do that for managers?) then although I still don't like the guy, I'd have to at least give him that.
I wouldn’t give him much for this.
It is more than likely a legal concern. He doesn’t want to get sued into oblivion by angry ex-models.
scarletxxx666 wrote:his name is woodman
wood can mean erection right????
woodman
the erection man
haha
Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote:I have interesting information for xxx/wgcz's lawyers for upcoming legal case which supposedly is being today, but I can't post it without moderator approval. It aslo says that all the links I posted are banned, so that doesn't help either. So, if you need my help from a legal point of view, open up my account, so I can help your legal team or tell me where I can send my message so that you can directly send it to your lawyer team.
Eloise wrote:I'm just seeing a 34 page going thread
Panorama wrote:I totally agree. I want to engage Pierre in constructive discussion, not involve his completely innocent family!! Please remove those posts!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests