Gemini wrote:Tastes Like Ass wrote:I would expect the same here. In fact, I fully expect to see a GF post here within the next 2-3 years that sounds something like this: "OMG!!! I just downloaded the new scene with [insert name of popular new model]. This girl is absolutely fantastic! What a scene! My only complaints are that there's no anal, and they use a condom. Because of that, I wasn't sure whether it would be worth 5 tickets. But I decided to take a chance on it, and man, I'm glad I did! Thanks to XXX for delivering another amazing scene! LP is the greatest!!!"
+1000
Now, do not be surprised if we get:
- Zero anal (and hence, no DAP, no DP, no ATM), because the ass, used to shitting, not to fucking
- Only scenes 1 on 1, because it normally takes two people having sex
- Sex, condoms only because of unprotected sex is dangerous due to the risk of pregnancy and / or disease
- Pixelization scenes (censorship, as in some Asian productions), or sex only in the clothes, because kids can hit on the content on the web
For all that, the world is not ready yet.
And I naively thought that everything is permitted, if all INVOLVED people (developers, actresses and subscribers) are ready.
sirnoelplum wrote:Tastes Like Ass wrote:tgcfc26 wrote:...the melodramatic responses because you won't be able to view a woman drinking piss anymore are incredible.
Do you think the responses would be any less "melodramatic" if XXX announced that there will be no more anal scenes, thus depriving us of the ability to see a woman take a dick in her ass?
'Melodramatic' in this context means you making a big issue out of something I don't care about. Tgcfc cares about anal so the same response would not class as melodramatic.
tgcfc26 wrote:Tastes Like Ass wrote:tgcfc26 wrote:...the melodramatic responses because you won't be able to view a woman drinking piss anymore are incredible.
Do you think the responses would be any less "melodramatic" if XXX announced that there will be no more anal scenes, thus depriving us of the ability to see a woman take a dick in her ass?
Chalk and cheese. This has never been a piss focused site, the selling point here has always been hard anal with the best European models. Maybe once a week, sometimes once a fortnight, we would see a PMAO scene, admittedly in the last few months there has been an increase in scenes of this nature (It lead to some posters here suggesting the name should be changed to Legalpiss) but I still wouldn't say it warrants a comparison to what a "no more anal" announcement would mean to this site and it's members.
tgcfc26 wrote:You see what you're doing here, TLA ? Joke posts are being taken literally and replied to. God damn you!
sirnoelplum wrote:So your rheory is that he thinks that pissibg scenes are reflecting badly on the inage of his site so he went about recording loads of them so that when he stopped producing them he could keep on releasing them????
That would be like me stopping buying cigarettes out of concern for my health but buying extra stock in the preceeding months so I can keep smoking after I have stopped buying them!
At the end of the day the direction the site has gone the last few months goes against xxx's comments regarding his concerns. Building up a stock as dap-addict suggests makes no sense if your concern is that releasing the scenes makes your site look bad because it means that the damage continues to be done long after you stop producing.
TomUK wrote:An alternative theory is that xxx wanted a post-announcement buffer of piss scenes to be fair to those who recently renewed their memberships and to ensure that there is no cause to complain that those memberships were mis-sold.
sirnoelplum wrote:Oh and this nonsense that removing attestation has caused this huge influx of members. Most people aren't even aware of attestation until it is too late so where would all these people have come from who were desperate to join, were not because of attestation and intimately follow the affairs of LP so they found out the minute attestation was dropped? What nonsense.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:This is exactly the kind of tortured logic I am talking about. Rather than simply looking at the best seller list, which includes a much higher percentage of piss scenes than their overall percentage of scenes would predict, you resort to 2-year-old polls and anecdotal evidence about 2 scenes. You're grasping at straws.
#1 makes no sense, not only for the reason that I just gave about the best seller list, but also because it doesn't explain why he won't let Giorgio and SOS keep shooting piss scenes, like he did with kreme scenes. As for #2, it just proves my point: Why would he care whether it was "socially acceptable" or not, unless he is planning to make the site much softer and aim toward fans of vanilla porn? If that's the case (which should be obvious to anyone who can read the writing on the wall), it's extremely naive to think that this will be the last change. Last I checked, the world is no more "ready" for DAP, anal fisting, etc., than it is for piss.
I guess it depends on what you mean by "hardcore" anal. If you think the anal scenes at 21S, Brazzers, etc., are "hardcore" anal, then yes, I suspect you will continue to get that type of stuff (although there will probably be a lot of scenes with no anal at all, just like there are at those and other "mainstream" sites).
The funny thing is that I fully expect that you, and others like you, will continue to shower praise upon the scenes, no matter how softcore they become. To go back to my Adriano example, check out his ADT thread, and you will notice that from time to time, some poor guy will have the temerity to inquire as to why his new scenes aren't as hardcore as his old stuff. That person is then invariably attacked, and called an idiot, by his army of sycophantic, ass-kissing fanboys (who, of course, are the real idiots).
I would expect the same here. In fact, I fully expect to see a GF post here within the next 2-3 years that sounds something like this: "OMG!!! I just downloaded the new scene with [insert name of popular new model]. This girl is absolutely fantastic! What a scene! My only complaints are that there's no anal, and they use a condom. Because of that, I wasn't sure whether it would be worth 5 tickets. But I decided to take a chance on it, and man, I'm glad I did! Thanks to XXX for delivering another amazing scene! LP is the greatest!!!"
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I understand the point of xxx somehow. Pissing Keeps LP in a kind of "getto" of extreme porn, but on the other side dap and fisting was in the same position till 2 years ago... It's complicate to take decisions, xxx knows what he is doing so somehow I'm sure everyone will get benefits from a "clean up" of the home page (i mean studios)... time will tell us smt, will be fast to understand if sales increase or decrease
gapefan wrote:
You look at the best sellers list and see piss.
I look at the best sellers list and see all my favorite models, doing copious amounts of Anal, Gapes, DP, DAP, and TAP
gapefan wrote:^You missed the point altogether. 'Correlation does not imply causation'. That's Statistics. Ever study it?
Just because two things are correlated does not mean that one caused the other.
I could just as easily correlate DAP with a scenes performance.
And I'll bet the R² for DAP is a lot closer to 1
As I said before, you're welcome to believe whatever you want. Makes no difference to me. That goes for you too, TLA and sirnoelplum.
gapefan wrote:^I like how you tossed anal in there, too. I thought we were only debating the correlation of one variable
I never said pissing didn't sell scenes, or that there's no profit to be made at all. I only said it's not as profitable, or as directly correlated with sales, as other more significant variables.
Porn is about money. Always has been, always will be.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:Then how about DAP? Up until the last year or two, LP produced far more piss scenes than DAP scenes. So, if XXX said "no more DAP scenes", do you think the reaction would be any less melodramatic?
(Incidentally, this is no mere hypothetical. I would not be at all surprised if the amount of DAP is greatly reduced, if not entirely eliminated, in the near future. After all, if the goal is to make LP more "acceptable" to the masses, DAP is hardly conducive to that.)
gapefan wrote:
I think Giorgio is right. And I agree with him when he says 'xxx knows what he is doing'.
I'm not falling for your doomsday prophecies.
allstar wrote:Now that attestation has been removed would a pre-paid/gift card visa work for purchasing membership and tickets?
Users browsing this forum: kefirpb and 16 guests