Stacy_Bloom wrote:End.
Don't tell me sweetheart. If it's true that's a horrible News.
Stacy_Bloom wrote:End.
Stacy_Bloom wrote:End.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Next week I will shoot a scene using a different payout system (for the girl only): 0$ payout and 50% revenueshare on profit, lifetime
The scene will have a price in ticket well below the average of last months. Lets see how it will go.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:dap-addict wrote:add: This said of course fees got higher compared to 2015. And so did all other base costs. Travel expenses got higher, especially for Russian girls flying in via Dubai or Istanbul.
But fees are actually getting under pressure again with many studios, I heard that even US girls working in Europe are asked to work for less than in 2022.
This is not true. in fact the american girls are still profitable even with high payout: the reason is because american models has mostly american fans, this makes the difference.
The main issue is on euro models, payout grown too much in the "covid bubble" and now it is decreasing.
Next week I will shoot a scene using a different payout system (for the girl only): 0$ payout and 50% revenueshare on profit, lifetime
The scene will have a price in ticket well below the average of last months. Lets see how it will go.
magizi87 wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:Next week I will shoot a scene using a different payout system (for the girl only): 0$ payout and 50% revenueshare on profit, lifetime
The scene will have a price in ticket well below the average of last months. Lets see how it will go.
I don't like this.
Because it could be abused very easily.
If a scene tanks. Performers don't get paid?????
How could they know factually if a scene is doing good or not?
This sounds horrible the more I think about it.
I think it would be better with the normal system of paying the performers upfront,
and reward with a percentage of the profits based on merits.
For example if a model arrives on set, on time, with some sort
of planned/practiced choreography for a sexy dance or strip-tease to
start the movie, twerks her booty when she is being DPed or DAP,
sucks cock passionately, the male anchor, ACTUALLY fucks the lady,
in other words, PERFORMERS, displaying passion and enthusiasm,
they should be rewarded with additional profits and those actors and models who,
just show for the paycheck should be eventually discarded.
Seriously, if you make movies good again, and somehow manage to get camerawork that
doesn't look like is complete VOMIT, lol, people wont mind the asking price,
AS MUCH, because EVERYTHING is judged based between the relationship of price and quality.
If your movies were somehow profitable at a retail price of 1 TKT,
you wouldn't get as much HEAT in the form of criticism, because it's cheap,
but if movies are expensive and also, CRAPPY, well everyone loses their mind.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:
- The technology to share a % of profit (or turnover) with a model is already available into our control panel at sheer/pornbox and can eventually be implemented also into my accounting software. So there are all the tools to have proper calculations. It needs to be arranged but the tools is usable and the system doable
Giorgio Grandi wrote:- The "passion" of a model is a subjective factor, who decide if a model is more or less sensual? What counts are the numbers (turnover - production cost = profit). If we also assume a "sensual" model sells better, so the turnover increase and so her profit
Giorgio Grandi wrote:There are many models that are willing to work for very low payout because they need to be "exposed" to the audience much more than actually get an high paycheck. This is because they rely on the exposure provided from the content to expand their other business business (escorting, self-production, etc).
visigoth2020260 wrote:models are made by the director.
there is much more to porn than
a beautiful face or body.
so are heavenly models made
unwatchable by the producer?
the girls you have mentioned aren't my type.
I am not interested in them but if they perform
well and the c, man, and director capture the scene
in extraordinary ways then they are to be owned.
Everyone has distinct preferences.
GG will provide his best effort and let the first-lifetime income model get the upper hand in the scene.
Imagine a runway of models in the style of GGG Thompson; the models will receive free Facetime. I can picture the GG studio being filled with models.
He was dead on when he predicted that the scenarios involving the two models would occur less frequently as the appearance of the three or five models was approaching.
It was excellent news for the competition as they started their two female scenes right away, but guess what, M, GG is going to put yall back in check.
What a beautiful scene this is. Basined, Syren De Mer, 7on1, ATM, DAP, Big Gapes, Pee Drink, Pee Shower, Cum in Mouth, Swallow GIO2549
I'm creating a music video for it because it is so fantastic. I'm no expert, but I'm learning through observation.![]()
Yes, I'm making yet another trailer, but with my unique twist.
hope everyone likes it.
visigoth2020260 wrote:https://www.xvideos.com/video77748075/syren_de_mer_music_video
enjoy.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Porn is way too cheap (since too many years)
pastaga wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:Porn is way too cheap (since too many years)
Internet changed the porn world. Now no need to buy physical supports. Now there's a lot of free porn. Now everybody can publish his own.
I don't see any reason expensive porn could work anymore.
Buck_Meister wrote:Best news of the year if Giorgio Grandi studio ends bankrupt
Giorgio Grandi wrote:The main issue is on euro models, payout grown too much in the "covid bubble" and now it is decreasing.
Next week I will shoot a scene using a different payout system (for the girl only): 0$ payout and 50% revenueshare on profit, lifetime
The scene will have a price in ticket well below the average of last months. Lets see how it will go.
Seraph0257 wrote:There is a 20 min scene released today for 90 tickets. 90?? 90 TICKETS??? I'm starting to think this site is being used for money laundering.
pastaga wrote:Problem with GIO is that both models, prices and scenes variety were better 4 years ago...
visigoth2020260 wrote:pastaga wrote:Problem with GIO is that both models, prices and scenes variety were better 4 years ago...
I'm sorry, Mr. Pastaga As M, GG has been on the path of innovation since his early days, I believe you are mistaken. You are only being sentimental.
lighting
studs
action
camera handling
plots
piss
and a great deal of other things have improved.
The cost has changed, but so have all aspects of daily living.
We all want the scenes to be cheap, but to make that happen, our studs would have to go without food.
They have a similar urge to eat as we do, and food is very expensive. 20 years ago, anything that cost 99 cents today costs $5,99 or more, yet earnings have barely increased.
Nevertheless, there's no need to give up because M, GG is searching for methods to reduce the cost without harming anyone.
That 99 Tk scenes must be an error, but some fucks will spend that much, and the studio now only needs 20 customers to turn a profit.
It is a valance that one must slant in his or her favor.
When someone wants a whore, he will do anything to get his hands on her goods, his intellect will shut down, and he will behave recklessly.
These johns are identifiable to the studios, who can then target them.
pomegrante wrote:Seraph0257 wrote:There is a 20 min scene released today for 90 tickets. 90?? 90 TICKETS??? I'm starting to think this site is being used for money laundering.
There is another one released today that's even more ridiculous & obscene , 90+ tickets for a 8 minute scene
visigoth2020260 wrote:pastaga wrote:Problem with GIO is that both models, prices and scenes variety were better 4 years ago...
I'm sorry, Mr. Pastaga As M, GG has been on the path of innovation since his early days, I believe you are mistaken. You are only being sentimental.
lighting
studs
action
camera handling
plots
piss
and a great deal of other things have improved.
The cost has changed, but so have all aspects of daily living.
We all want the scenes to be cheap, but to make that happen, our studs would have to go without food.
They have a similar urge to eat as we do, and food is very expensive. 20 years ago, anything that cost 99 cents today costs $5,99 or more, yet earnings have barely increased.
Nevertheless, there's no need to give up because M, GG is searching for methods to reduce the cost without harming anyone.
magizi87 wrote:
Which is also bad for me, because I want women as beautiful as Nicole Black
staying in the porn business long enough to be able to do scenes in the level of a Veronica Avluv
without DAP and pissing. haha, I know this is asking for a lot.
pastaga wrote:As all the pornbox material is also on Sheer, I think these creators just want to sell it on Sheer and not here.
petermc934 wrote:If you want to see beautiful girls in scenes without DAP and without pissing, there’s literally thousands of websites/movies that cater for this. The USP of this site is the piss content, rough sex and DAP gangbangs. I’m not into DAP either, I’m just here mainly for the piss content. I’d be happy without the multiple penetrations, just anal, pissing, puking and rough sex/face slapping. Lots of others though want the crazy penetrations.
magizi87 wrote:petermc934 wrote:If you want to see beautiful girls in scenes without DAP and without pissing, there’s literally thousands of websites/movies that cater for this. The USP of this site is the piss content, rough sex and DAP gangbangs. I’m not into DAP either, I’m just here mainly for the piss content. I’d be happy without the multiple penetrations, just anal, pissing, puking and rough sex/face slapping. Lots of others though want the crazy penetrations.
You and me remember Legalporno VERY differently.
To me Legalporno, was a scenes were very beautiful women
were thrown into a ring, to is a way, wrestle the best male actors in the world,
best in terms of size and skill.
Charlie, Chris Diamond, Ed Junior, Nacho, Kid, Mike Chapman, Mike Angelo, ETC, ETC
With women who were effortlessly watchable like Lita, Blanche, Amirah, Nikita, etc, etc, etc.
Analvids has very few male actors I would call stars and women
are just not as good looking anymore.
The fact that Legalporno were also doing gangbangs and foursomes
that includes but is not limited to DAP and Pissing, was not
it's competitive edge for me, it was the intangible amazing spectacle of the scenes.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests