BlueShadow wrote:And this is one of the reasons why girls (like Josephine Jackson, Emma Hix etc.) expose only after some time their true feelings about that scene: bad experience, was stupid, uncomfortable etc.
Yes certainly a big reason.
Another is as we all recognise - when something horrible happens to you, it can take a while to digest and process. In the mean time you may be in subconscious denial, or you may deliberately try to pretend it didn't happen, or most usually you just 'put a brave face on it' and force cheerfulness on yourself.
Put yourself again in the position of a girl after a gut-wrenchingly awful experience with PW. You are back in the hotel or hostel, the cash in your purse, the anesthetic wearing off your burning rectum as you dry-retch in the toilet. You're alone in a city where you do not speak the language.
And that city, like Prague, is full of creepy parasites on the industry, scumbag males, wannabe producers seeking crumbs from the rich man's table, always looking out for a girl who can be tricked into a fuck; shady gold-digging hags who claim to work for escort agencies, and others who feed at the murky bottom of the porn pond, who have been given your contact and know that you have just been 'Gerbiered'. The folks who pimped you to PW want to know how it went and what you will do next. You are new to all this, and people have told you that getting on with him is a key to future success. You will get a lot of disturbing calls and messages.
This is a major reason why Peter likes to be 'first'. Not just for the sick-making bragging he can do and the exclusivity he can claim for his members. But also because a girl at this beginner stage is exceptionally impressionable, suggestible and vulnerable.
You likely have an invitation/requirement to join the little man in the 'Boss' cap, for lunch the next day. It turns out not too bad. You have to watch the baboon stuffing its hairy gut with pizza or sushi until its whole body breaks out in sweat. You have to listen to it talking incessantly and laughing a piglet-squeal at its own
plaisanteries. If you've learned any English you will cringe at his way with that language. But on the whole, he and his mob let you eat in peace. Except - you will be obliged to pose for photos with the buffoon exposing his Hungarian dentistry while he hugs you. Now, he can claim to be 'top friends' and more important he can use the smiling next-day pics as evidence that he cannot have abused you.
In the days and weeks that follow, you realise how hard it is to escape from the web. He stays in touch, tries to control your next steps. In particular he wants you to delay doing anal or DP elsewhere, so he has time to get your content online as 'exclusive`
(but who cares?) for as long as possible. He will insist that you write nicely about him on your social media. He may even want to take over those accounts for self-promotion. If you have in fact worked for others before, he badgers you to say that only now have you found a good serious director. He will publish 'your' comments on his forum, where his dupes will come online with "Did you destroy her, master, did you fill her with your piss?", because he's promised them that there are more and dirtier scenes of you in the box. If you object, he will bash and trash you, call you a 'snake', shout that you are a cold stupid difficult girl who is only interested in money.
Whether or not you continue in porn, the whole disgusting experience takes years to shake off. And if you do make a success of your career, he will always be commenting on you in ways that make it seem you owe it all to him. He will ask you to shoot with him again. Mostly you will refuse: if we consider the multitude of women Peterkin has (his word) 'formatted', very few return for another go as Rebecca Volpetti and some others have.
(Members will BEG him to have you back, and he will reply, 'We are still top friends but I am too busy!!!' or 'Sorry but sometime human's nature is very bad, this girl turn out not what I was think!!!' )
None of the above implies anything illegal on NoWood's part. Unlike his
copain the child-rapist in Belgium or his hero the child-killer in the Kremlin, he is probably just about on the right side of the law - that is, if there is any point in talking about the law in that country run by another of his grim heroes.
But legal or otherwise, his
modus operandi is morally and aesthetically putrid. Thank heavens that his influence is declining so sharply - there
can be such a thing as clean safe healthy respectful and beautiful porn, but it will never emerge from his scuzzy rented rooms, that's for sure.