Panorama wrote:It's amazing just how many of Woodman's members aren't actually PAYING members. I thought you were supposed to be doing really well Pierre.
So after raving on about this "Uriel" actually being BlueShadow in disguise and how he's not a member blah, blah, blah, Pierre then goes on to contradict himself horribly!
The law states that a 15-year-old girl is a MINOR. That was what Black Magic went to prison for SEX WITH A MINOR.
Yet Pierre suggests that because this 15-year-old minor looked 22 (he's very specific about that - not 20, not 25, but 22?) It's ok to have sex with her whether she is a minor or not.
So the law is ok just as long as the girl looks like a girl and not a young woman? So does that mean if she was 14 almost 15, but looked 16 you'd be ok with that too?
Then while trying to defend his paedophile best mate he says that "he's paid his debt" meaning that he admits that he broke the law and went to prison for being a PAEDOPHILE!
Doesn't matter how you cut it, Pierre, your views are damn CREEPY, and I wouldn't trust you or your convicted paedophile friend anywhere near my teenage daughter. Your views are disgusting, your site is disgusting, and the fact you're now aligning yourself with Jesus Christ is showing everyone just how far off the rails you've gone. The sooner they shut you down the better.
BlueShadow wrote:Lol, I swear I saw this comment from PW just now.
I'm not the only one who posts here but he always mentions me, I must be so important to him LOL
I love my haters!!! LOL
BlueShadow wrote:Lol, I swear I saw this comment from PW just now.
I'm not the only one who posts here but he always mentions me, I must be so important to him LOL
I love my haters!!! LOL
Simi1101 wrote:He now is indulging in self-pity because Gina turned out to have developed in a self-conscious and self-confident strong woman and this is what a weak personality like Woodman is scared of.
Panorama wrote:Ladies and gentlemen the winner of today's Darwin Award for most hilarious comment goes to "JohanvonR"! (aka Pierre Woodman)
BlueShadow wrote:
___________________
Actually it's the other way around...PW tried to imply that he did an anal scene with her that day...but in reality it's just a regular B/G (smart girl), so that scene doesn't exist (so @Chocuba was right) except for an anal with her boyfriend 2 years later that she would have done anyway on Only fans.
It must not have been easy to accept that she is now shooting B/G only with her boyfriend huh...
Let me guess. He insisted in his subtle ways on trying to get her to do a DP, or a WUNF alone with him. Sorry, better not piss off her boyfriend, especially if he is an MMA fighter. LOL
Simi1101 wrote:10-20 years ago, Woodman was said to be able to talk actual models out of their clothes and bring girls into the industry that would have never been open to do it.
At that time, girls not up to his standards he humiliated via the STHUF - section:
https://www.woodmancastingx.com/sthuf/
Today, there is no difference between STHUF and what he tries to sell as "bomba"!!
Wonder when the self declared homophobe will again film men fucked in the ass with strap-ons ...
Pierre Woodman wrote:This morning I won on court against Stephane Pacaud ( owner of Xvideos Xnxxx and king of the piracy world ) for the 11th time on 11 trials started by him against me !!!
Simi1101 wrote:This is hilarious: That Lia Lin XO video was clearly shot in front of Woodmans Greenscreen and then intercut with stock-material from an exotic place, still the members are so dumb not to recognize this.
Every sheep has the master it deserves.
Dickson_Pizdah wrote:Someone kindly called me 'poetic' but really right now words fail me.?
Pierre Woodman wrote:if I didn't surround myself with so much precaution in my work by filming everything and didn't beat me like a tiger by dismantling all his allegations on my person, the site would already not be online for a long time.
Panorama wrote: And with any luck, you'll end up in a place where someone else gets to watch you in a little cell for 24hr a day, now that would be poetic justice!
Panorama wrote: Staying on the downward spiral we come to Brillbabes. . . . . Or Not so Brill in the fact that they appear to be trafficking their models! (Check out this new video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srhVjgDO8f8&t=19s)
sumacs3 wrote: In this video it is claimed that the agency sends models to PW and the models are only told it is for castings. The model is told nothing else and is expected to ask no questions about it. Just go. Then PW pushes the model to have sex. It is said that other agencies used to be like this, but not now.
If these things are true, and if we take the PW model Wendy (Muller) as an example from 2008, then despite the belief by many that these scenes are fully staged, it could really be otherwise, and Wendy really did think her casting was to be just a fashion shoot. This would help explain her very genuine looking reactions to the things PW suggested to her in the interview before they got down and dirty. She had not appeared in any porn before her casting.
It really could be that she was pimped out.
Panorama wrote:The only way Woodman can be golden in any of this from my point of view (Robin feel free to correct me) is if the casting is genuine UP TO the point of him asking them to shoot a sex scene with him, then getting them to sign a release. . . That's why from 2017 you'll notice all those types of casting are not done by Woodman anymore and members are now more likely subjected to far, far more experienced "ladies" . . ..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests