]"If what you are looking for is female solo, girl-on-girl lesbian, or boy-girl one-on-one.. what are you doing here in the first place?"
I can't think of a single scene here, where the camera isn't centered on the woman.
fremmed479 wrote:I can't think of a single scene here, where the camera isn't centered on the woman.
Well, for me this has to do with estetics. Two guys entering her at the same time reduces this estetics when it comes to the focus of the woman. Doing good gape- angles and positions is easier with one guy at the time. Take Crystals debut as an example. The part where se lies with her neck at the floor and her ass up being assfucked one at the time. That is superhot to mee cuz you see the woman. Now, what would happen if a secound guy came in? What you would see then is a guy who gets in the way.
But DP and DAP can be a hot adding as i said. But i would like to see more of one guy at the time for the estetic reasons.
All the other more "extreme" things defines Legalporn and that is fine, but this things should be directed in a estetic way and too much of it may reduce the estetics. It is a balance i guess.
laura. wrote:I am a classic bisexual in so much that I find both males and females sexually attractive although I am more picky when it comes to men. When it comes to porn however I would say that 90% of my focus is on the women as aesthetically wise they excite me far more. I tend to just see dicks and rarely inspect the guys body or face. There are exceptions to this of course but in the main I am here for the girls.
I would also think that the vast majority of straight guys on here are also getting off to the girls, irrespective of the number of male body parts on show and that multiple cocks just makes the inevitable sex more extreme and perverted which in turn is likely to create more arousal.
Not sure where this is going really? The classic counter (straw man) argument is of course that all boy girl porn is bisexual as even in its most stripped back version, you are still going to see a man and a cock entering a woman. How does the multiplication of cocks make it any more 'gay'? I don't agree with that argument btw, just using it to make a point.
My perception may be entirely wrong and perhaps lots of men get off to both. Not a problem either way, we all use porn for different reasons xx
fremmed479 wrote:This in my opinion should be the norm...
fremmed479 wrote:Here is one spesific example that may point to what i am trying to say:
Look at the picture at the right and then at the pic to the left.
Why would a straight man find the pic to the right more arousing visually speaking if it where not for some form of a bi- factor?
I mean, lets get real. What we see is a lot of limbs from a guy and the side of a womans face with a naked man in front of her, one on top of her and one under her. and one behind her. This is almost 80% man- skin. The other pic is a beautiful woman being entered by one guy at a time with moments in between where we have the chance to see her gape. This in my opinion should be the norm and the we can add dp, dpp, pdp, tap, top tip or what the fuc all this names are....:P That is all fun, but are we talking about sex here and the visual beauty of it or are we talking about sircus?
As i said befre. I like it nasty, but when you have more than three guys, we should be aware about the aestetics too.
So if you disagree about this then why?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests