That Europe *so far* has accepted refugees in large numbers fleeing the conflict in Ukraine is a positive (and humane) thing, bearing in mind that (as with all NATO-backed wars) they are primarily responsible for fomenting and catalysing the conflict by arming, training and politically backing (on a domestic and international scale) a corrupt far right regime that was supposed to be de-escalating tensions to secure a peace between the west and east of Ukraine (Minsk/Minsk 2).
We now know that Poroshenko (by his recent proud and public declaration) only (and cynically) agreed to sign the Minsk agreements to buy more time for Ukraine to further arm and train with their Western NATO partners, in order to eventually attack and drive the Russian-speaking Ukrainians and ethnic Russians (who have always lived in Ukraine) out of the country altogether. Either slaughter them in their homes or force them to flee into Russia.
By no coincidence at all, this was also the aim of an enthusiastic Nazi/Ukraine alliance during WW2 (see Bandera and the OUN) and their shared goal of 'Lebensraum'.
And so this same goal (based on the same old ethnic hatreds, handed down through generations) survives (and was thriving, at least until February this year) in the ideology of the current NATO/Kiev Regime (and in the minds of those currently under spell of NATO propaganda).
In essence, violent and racist 'Old Colonial Europe' still doing what violent and racist 'Old Colonial Europe' always did.
For that reason, since Europe chose to support the NATO-aligned Kiev govt's ambitions for conflict (despite all polls consistently showing that a large majority the Ukrainian population wanted a peaceful resolution to their west-east issue), Europe/UK now
*owes bigtime* those Ukrainian refugees caught in the middle a safe home (temporary or permanent), and the means to survive ongoing (until the conflict reaches a conclusion by which they may have the option to return or to request permanent shelter in Europe).
Sadly (for the Ukrainian refugees' sake, not the corrupt Kiev regimes' sake) I don't think that support will last.
Currently, Europeans are happy to change their social media avatars to Ukrainian flags and post pro-Ukraine/anti-Russia memes 24-7, because they are all cheap and easy means to score virute credits among their peers (the Road to Hell being paved not only with 'good intentions' but 'convenience').
But this autum-winter the EU/UK will be forced (by collapsing economic and political circumstances) to behold the iceberg of economic costs of indulging a long-term US/Kiev Govt proxy war with Russia. And they will rightly recognise those costs to be ruinous.
Will those same allies still stand solid while utility bills are doubling/tripling, while unemployment is doubling/tripling, and while rent/housing costs are soaring (increased demand and stagnant supply)?
Or will the EU public and their maistream media begin to turn on those desperate Ukrainains as a convenient scapegoat for their own failings ('They are Slavs not Europeans!', 'They brought it upon themselves!', 'Poland/Germany/Italy/etc for the Poles/Germans/Italians/etc!')?
By way of a precendet, how do NATO allies currently treat refugees from Africa and the Middle East, fleeing NATO armed and supported conflicts in those countries?
Are the doors still open? Or are they now consistenly treated as a burden and as an enemy?
As things stand it's a wonderful and commendable thing (respect to EU for that, if not much else, for the time being) that there has been no significant uptick in new Ukrainain models entering the world of xxx (Maya White being one extremely beautiful and talented exception, to check out and support if you don't already).
- maya white av - Copy.png (393.18 KiB) Viewed 8764 times
Maya's forum thread.
viewtopic.php?f=104&t=44747&p=684230&hilit=maya+white#p677642'Sociologically speaking' these things should remain at a stable and predictible constant (modulating only on a generation-to-generation timescale, not mere months). Therefore any rapid and significant increase in numbers in a particular nationality or ethnicity within a country would signal that something has gone seriously wrong within that group, and that sheer desperation is forcing them as a group into seeking to generate the very means they need for survival via routes they would (under normal circumstances) never want to engage in.
There will always be a very small minority (a fration of a fraction) of women who are fascinated and excited enough by the adult industry to want to seek to participate in it themselves.
While there will always be a *huge* majority of women who do no want to get involved (even among those who are eager consumers of adult content).
The reasons why not may vary from 'wanting to, but lacking confidence' in either their abilities or their appearnace, to taking a strong moral/political/religious stance on the issue.
All these reasons should be valued and respected, as a woman's right to determine her own fate.
So while I will always welcome every new Ukrainian model to the site who is entering the industry with open eyes and for all the right personal reasons, for the reason stated above, I also sincerely hope (and this as someone who thinks Ukrainian women are famously and consipcuously gorgeous, as a much loved cohort of Eastern European femininity) that there is no significant increase in those entering the business in the short-to-medium term. If it does, we should be very concerned.