error01x wrote:Serious, why do good looking women fuck bader then less good looking women?
mkbox wrote:Beautiful women doing balls deep anal, smiling after cumshots are vital to porn. The majority will not buy porn with ugly, heavily tattooed women.
davebowman wrote:There are plenty of gorgeous women doing great and extreme sex act - however, it is true that there are certain girls who can get by on looks alone. This is especially true for big tit fans, where you have plenty of models with extreme (usually surgically altered) massive boobs. Most of these do as little as possible sexually - and the simple reason is because they don't need to. They'll get paid for just standing there, or doing as little as possible, and don't need to put in any performance effort, so why should they? It can be frustrating, but they are just paid for the way they look, and don't need to do any more to earn $$$$$.
A girl who is somewhere at the plainer end of the scale - not ugly, but just someone who has average looks for a porn actress - has to really put in a great performance if they want to stand out from the crowd and make a good career of it.
vvvv84335 wrote:I find that the dirtier/nastier the action is, the hotter they are.
Ultra-Gape wrote:vvvv84335 wrote:I find that the dirtier/nastier the action is, the hotter they are.
Certainly intensity of the sex is ultimately what most turns me on. For me a demonstration of this is girls whose faces who may 'technically' become less attractive as their make-up wears off but for me the signs of sexual exertion generally them way hotter.
vvvv84335 wrote: I find that the dirtier/nastier the action is, the hotter they are. If they look like models but don't do much of a sexual performance it becomes about as boring as Playboy.
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:vvvv84335 wrote: I find that the dirtier/nastier the action is, the hotter they are. If they look like models but don't do much of a sexual performance it becomes about as boring as Playboy.
Absolutely agreed, my view of hotness is defined by how dirty/nasty they are, the intensity and roughness of the scene.
cumdump wrote:xxxVIPERxxx wrote:vvvv84335 wrote: I find that the dirtier/nastier the action is, the hotter they are. If they look like models but don't do much of a sexual performance it becomes about as boring as Playboy.
Absolutely agreed, my view of hotness is defined by how dirty/nasty they are, the intensity and roughness of the scene.
I agree with this, sometimes it is a redeeming factor like tongue stud, nipple piercings, dirty talk, how they suck a cock or ride a cock, if they are plain nasty and filthy and like it hard and rough and intense, sometimes it's the face, huge boobs, big bouncy ass, all depends.
But there are definitely some maybe not the prettiest but are just really nasty in a good way and it's really hot and have something very unique about them.
error01x wrote:Serious, why do good looking women fuck bader then less good looking women?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests