Panorama wrote: . . . sumacs, I'm glad you decided to junk your membership even though you actually weren't financially supporting him. The gesture alone is a win for what is right. Woodman doesn't need the money but every member that leaves his site makes him psychologically shine just that little bit dimmer. He WILL see your post here.... and many of his followers will see it too and hopefully look within themselves to see if their support feels right.
Hopefully, you'll stick around because I'm surrounded by guys who know the ins and the outs of the porn industry and I often feel isolated. But if you don't, I wish you all the best for the future and thank you for giving me the opportunity to share my thoughts with you.
BlueShadow wrote:
________
Speaking of dumb comment
What about here? When PW says that he was expecting for Ginebra Bellucci a better ''career'' for this ''perfect angel'' (just because she didn't listen to him to not make anal right away for other productions ('cause it's no good for her career) also for LP/AV. The usual ''self serving advice'')?
__
But let's see this bad and unprolific career of Ginebra Bellucci:
__
And here? PW may not have been rude to say these things on a public forum? (not that it matters what egoman says, as we can see from how many productions Ginebra worked) After he called her perfect ANGEL...the here he says exactly the opposite ahahahah and you give credit to this clown.
______
and what about here mr. JDR, since you like to be such a paladin... here PW wasn't rude with these comments about a model?
_______
and here, with Kitana Lure?
_______
here with Misha Cross saying she will never be Lana Rhoades etc. (after he bashed also Lana Rhoades btw, this clown )
________
and here?? Maybe he was nice to Ivy Rein, bashing her just because she doesn't want to work for him?
______
And also here...he was professional making fun of a girl exposing her in this way? And also call her ''Dumb''? C'mon...whats your opinion mr. JDR (aka PW probably)??
______
Here instead for sure he wasn't RUDE with Zlata Shine, right? (always because she refused to work there, and certainly Zlata Shine has no problem working with any production in Budapest, Prague, Barcelona... even if she didn't start with anal in the hotel rooms of PW...
So 1-before you talk about rude comments, look at your own house first.
2- that last sentence about "history proves..." you can shove it up your ass, you'll make better use of it. And excuse me for being ''rude''.
Panorama wrote:Good to see you guys taking note of the forum!
Firstly "JDR" I don't know who "Vince Karter" is or what he did with "Marie Berger" (don't know who she is either) so how could I comment on what they did. If it was something shot by WGCZ or whoever they're called I'd be right with you complaining (If you did?) But this thread is about Pierre Woodman. I'm only concerned with what HE does. Ask yourself, why would a nobody guy who quite obviously knows NOTHING about DAP, DP, RGS, and crap like that want to attack Pierre Woodman? Well, it's because although I know nothing about the hardcore sex industry, I do know about how to treat people with dignity and respect, and I really dislike people who don't afford that courtesy to others. I especially dislike people who take advantage of, manipulate, and degrade people MUCH younger than themselves. You know who I'm talking about.
You need to start opening your eye's research your own information and not just believe what Pierre tells you. Go and watch his old castings, talk with some of those models, read his forum and instead of looking at it from your own selfish point of view, look at it from your own daughter's point of view, because every model who you want to see "get the Woodman treatment" is somebody's daughter.
By the way "damix". He has not discovered 80-90% of the world's most famous porn stars, those women would have become famous without any input from Woodman at all. They are still mentioned by other producers, and award ceremonies, alas Woodman is not. You mention 8 of those women as an example, now go and put that figure to the number of models that were never seen again but had the potential of being famous (Sylvia Buntarka being one of the latest) but were utterly dissuaded by Woodman's deceitful behaviour. Or the already famous models who could have been spectacular "hardcore" actresses but never did boy/girl work after seeing Woodman. Go look, you'll find hundreds, if not thousands!!
As for Freya, do you really seriously think that she is going to worry about whether she was remembered in 20 years' time?? Seriously??? Most women who work in the adult industry NEVER even want to speak about their past careers, never mind worrying about whether they were great or not! AND (and I say this from speaking to them) most will NOT even speak about their experience with Woodman! Not a glowing report eh?? Again you're listening to Pierre when you should be using your own brains and doing your own research. So please, stop worrying about Freya. She made the best decision she probably has EVER made not seeing Woodman, unlike many, many models before her the memory of being violated by him will NOT be a problem for her!
Panorama wrote:
As for Freya, do you really seriously think that she is going to worry about whether she was remembered in 20 years' time?? Seriously??? Most women who work in the adult industry NEVER even want to speak about their past careers, never mind worrying about whether they were great or not! AND (and I say this from speaking to them) most will NOT even speak about their experience with Woodman! Not a glowing report eh?? Again you're listening to Pierre when you should be using your own brains and doing your own research. So please, stop worrying about Freya. She made the best decision she probably has EVER made not seeing Woodman, unlike many, many models before her the memory of being violated by him will NOT be a problem for her!
BlueShadow wrote:Panorama wrote: . . . ah yes, he's a pathological narcissist (he need drama) ,I always forget he has mental issues.
K.R.Murphy wrote:" To intentionally injure a person, whether for personal gain, pleasure or to satisfy a need without remorse, is evil. To do it repeatedly, after the consequences are explained, is evil. To not care how one’s words or actions affect a person is evil. To habitually lie, deceive or manipulate another person for personal gain is evil. They may not be aware that they are evil. Maybe that’s all they’ve known but it is still evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Pierre Woodman wrote:"she deserved only an anal destruction that unfortunately I did not gave her !!!"
ValenciaCF wrote:Maybe he's sending his alter egos on this forum too because suddenly we have couple of his heroes here glorifying that paedophiles work over here.
Panorama wrote:First of all, I have to respectfully disagree with you there Valencia. Neither "sumacs" or "poldijk" have said anything that has distracted from this thread.
Panorama wrote:(By the way..... I liked the attention to detail in your thread, that's right on my wavelength, I might stop by if I get a chance sometime! )
BlueShadow wrote:
Well, if the person directly involved doesn't say so ... it's speculation about his sexual orientation, but I don't see how being gay can be so ''infamous'' or serious ...
What's infamous about being ''homosexuEl''? Tell me...
Once again he proves who he is himself.
poldijk wrote:thanks for supporting us Panorama. I feel a lot of respect in you, despite our differences. but some people like to hastily identify others as PW heroes...I'm maybe misunderstood because of my none native english. However, everybody should understand when I said I'm sad about what he became, by highlighting Robin's post talking about PW's dirty method to break girl's reputation.
I think I will go back to english school
thanks! you're warmly welcome to give your feedback, Sumacs is suggesting some interesting changes
and...you will make a break with the PW arena
sumacs3 wrote: Just a quick update in case anyone is confused.
I requested to cancel my membership to the PW site, as I have discussed here, but I appear to still be considered a member. I could find no place on the site that offered a simple way to cancel. So I sent a message to the Board Administrator(s), as you have seen the first part of that message in one of my earlier posts here. I will not submit any new posts to that site.
Panorama wrote:
Who do you think she is referring to in the highlighted red box below Pierre??
Panorama wrote:Don't worry about it sumacs, you have nothing to prove here.
I've talked with a few Woodman members who I haven't managed to convince and I don't hold anything against them it's their free choice and will to support him.
sumacs3 wrote:I certainly did not like the way he treated the religious friend topic.
andre_pittet wrote:Hi, I’m new here and I wanted to thank you all for researching about that Gerbier to expose him (which in French sounds like « gerber » which literally means « to puke »… to puke is what I want to do the more I discover about this waste of air). Back in the day, I remember watching some of his videos but some things were already shady and felt out of place. There are so many weird things about his website : the fact he chose a spider as a logo, the loud volume for his casting intro, the fact all the thumbnails of the videos of the girls look morbid and ugly for some reason (he managed to make the girls look ugly when irl they’re absolutely perfect), the badly made photoshop of himself with a muscular body, I don’t get why any sane person would feel appealed by the overall aesthetics of the website itself.
Panorama wrote:sumacs3 wrote:I certainly did not like the way he treated the religious friend topic.
sumacs I very much doubt Woodman cares about anything to do with religion. (I think he has actually said he is atheist?) Don't forget, if this guy got anywhere near god Woodman would probably ask the big fella what he was doing in his seat!!!!
ValenciaCF wrote:Panorama wrote:sumacs3 wrote:I certainly did not like the way he treated the religious friend topic.
sumacs I very much doubt Woodman cares about anything to do with religion. (I think he has actually said he is atheist?) Don't forget, if this guy got anywhere near god Woodman would probably ask the big fella what he was doing in his seat!!!!
Yes PW is an atheist and he has said it on his forum. Making argument with people and debating about the creation of the earth as if he was there before the start of humanity. . . D
andre_pittet wrote:There are so many weird things about his website : the fact he chose a spider as a logo, the loud volume for his casting intro, the fact all the thumbnails of the videos of the girls look morbid and ugly for some reason (he managed to make the girls look ugly when irl they’re absolutely perfect), the badly made photoshop of himself with a muscular body, I don’t get why any sane person would feel appealed by the overall aesthetics of the website itself.
robin_reid wrote:Another point to consider is the locations he chooses. Ugly rooms with old and ugly furniture that give a sordid and dark touch to his videos. It is useless to have a pretty model with a good make-up (and her make-up artist is good, nobody doubts that) if then the whole atmosphere that surrounds that model is ugly, morbid, with old and ugly furniture, with darkness... A pretty girl always will look more pretty with a nice background and location in general and good lighting. [made bold by sumacs3] I’m not telling go to shoot in a super villa in Ibiza like Vixen, just choose a little better location for same and even less price than those horrible locations he shoot in Budapest.
Panorama wrote:Believe it or not but I'm not a huge forum "fan" so posting to them is another new experience for me, as well as finding out about DAP, DPP, RGS, WGCZ, WX etc, etc, etc. I find it all very very strange, but I've taken a strong dislike to Mr Woodman and all his rotten antics and just decided to try and do something about it. So here I am for the foreseeable future.... or until the powers that be here boot me!
Panorama wrote:But I will try to pop into your thread, I should at least try to contribute somewhere else instead of taking the p**ss out of Woodman all the time!
andre_pittet wrote:There are so many weird things about his website : the fact he chose a spider as a logo, the loud volume for his casting intro, the fact all the thumbnails of the videos of the girls look morbid and ugly for some reason (he managed to make the girls look ugly when irl they’re absolutely perfect)
robin_reid wrote:It's like if it was done at purpose, models looking ugly. Guys, check the thumb of any pretty girl on any company, no matter who, it can be big brand like Vixen or Dorcel or it can be any small russian company or whoever, then check the thumb of the same model at Woodman’s: looking ugly.
So what’s the finality of to have a good make up artist if then you manage to make the girls looking ugly?
Mistery
BlueShadow wrote:Another fake promises
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests