dap-addict wrote:scarlet, sorry, generally with your posting style in all threads over here.
then block me
dap-addict wrote:scarlet, sorry, generally with your posting style in all threads over here.
robin_reid wrote:scarlet if you want to enjoy his disgusting and abusive scat videos with cheated and coerced girls, you can join to his site instead of ask it here
robin_reid wrote:Enjoy scarlet
dap-addict wrote:Scarlet, I know you probably just want to hear that: But I am getting fed up with this way!lightman41 wrote:I don't believe all the friendship with Julie. I agree with Panorama. As a good friend, I behave differently. At a certain point in time, when this incident was being discussed and puzzled more and more on the Internet, he had to write something. Then Vincent, his good friend and Julie's ex, got involved. And from then on it became unbelievable. Suddenly there was a story with a stranger in which Pierre and Vincent were the worried friends. Had contact, were worried ...
1st post here, thus the more let me ask: what stranger?
And Vincent her long-term ex?
I though they were married if its him, ok its a detail.
lightman41 wrote:Panorama wrote:Mister Ananas wrote:The thread goes too far fairly regularly. I have always been a proponent of sticking to the facts. Otherwise, the uninitiated just see screeching monkeys here. Our messaging kind of sucks, but then again, so does his.
It's comments like that Ananas that can help the uninitiated (like myself) to take what you say on the board more seriously. That has been the theme I've seen in both forums as I've been looking around and it kinda makes you not believe anyone, which is a shame when you are looking for FACTS!
I'd just like to add to my earlier observations. I was reading his thread on 'Julie Skyhigh' who unfortunately passed away in 2018. Again he claimed he was "very good friends" with Julie, but only mentioned her passing two years later after another member brought it to light. Maybe not as a "good a friend" as he made out? Also, there has been debate on whether her casting should be removed from the site as she is no longer with us. Although I agree with Mr Woodman that he should continue to show her movies as he wasn't "directly" involved with her passing, I do think it shows how MONEY is still a driving force when it comes to his decision making. If I was a director and "a good friend" the first thing I would have done 2 years ago was let her fans know (because she will have fans as well as Pierre) And secondly, I would now make sure that if anyone downloaded her casting a significant about of the proceeds would go to a suicide or domestic abuse charity. I certainly wouldn't keep my mouth shut because it's such a "huge tragedy" and continue to pocket any money gained from her.
A lot has happened in the "Julie Skyhigh" thread in his forum.
I don't believe all the friendship with Julie. I agree with Panorama. As a good friend, I behave differently. At a certain point in time, when this incident was being discussed and puzzled more and more on the Internet, he had to write something. Then Vincent, his good friend and Julie's ex, got involved. And from then on it became unbelievable. Suddenly there was a story with a stranger in which Pierre and Vincent were the worried friends. Had contact, were worried and then one day, which doesn't sound very timely, to find out what should have happened!
And Vincent actually had nothing more to do with Julie's website and the other accounts. They even take action against allegedly fake Twitter accounts.
That was demonstrably refuted!
And again and again pro Pierre Posts that somehow sound the same.
Finally the thread was closed!
That Vincent exchanged Julie for another seems more plausible to me. Julie preferred to act behind the camera. There was simply no more money to be made.
P.S. The whole story with Julie is a mystery anyway. There is no credible endorsement. Somehow everyone seems to know better, but nobody really knows. What surprises me is the fact that hardly anything was known in 2018. She's not a stranger and I guess you can't hide certain things like that nowadays. More should have gone viral.
And I can't figure out some of the chronological sequences of your FB accounts either. People who replied to her posts just over a year ago are now posting the alleged truth on other platforms. Somehow strange, since these people appear more often in FB in the whole context.
In an interview, Julie mentioned the extreme stalking behavior in her home country. Maybe that's where the whole story came about, consciously or unconsciously!
For my part, I would like her to have made the exit and left. For the sake of herrself and the family So that she can have a happy life somewhere !! She definitely deserves it!
lightman41 wrote:And something else.
Suddenly people log into his forum who then try to confirm the story with a stranger. Is a little bit unbelievable !!
Julie suffered more from Vincent exchanging her for someone else !!!
dap-addict wrote:lightman41 wrote:And something else.
Suddenly people log into his forum who then try to confirm the story with a stranger. Is a little bit unbelievable !!
Julie suffered more from Vincent exchanging her for someone else !!!
I read back on her model thread, but I really still dont understand your reference here.
Are you talking of her new BF after that breakup with Vincent?
Is this the reference?
Btw, I didnt know her, but for me it looks pretty obvious that she got financially and emotionally exploited. No idea how much this contributed to what she did to herself, root may be deeper in her own personality, but such crisis trigger things and discussing it here shows again an abyss of ppl around the Bp lier ape, I simply can't find words for anymore.
lightman41 wrote:To Panorama
I turn away from comments like "If Julie had stayed in the business, probably nothing would have happened" !!
The correct answer would be "If Julie hadn't got into this business ..."
And that's the point. You talk yourself into it, try to distort the truth and when it gets uncomfortable you close the thread! Julie was always dependent on Pierre's good friend Vincent, who was a manager, mentor and "friend" !! Both have the same approach.
I had contact with Pierre once during the Venus setup - he had the stand next door. He was definitely the number one topic of conversation among the colleagues in the evening - not in a positive way!
And then the story of the allegedly faked Twitter account. There was advertising for Julie's old Clips4Sale account, which Vincent now operates under a new name. Who will benefit from it? Definitely not Julie's family. Pierre wants to fool people with this !!
lightman41 wrote:Read the Julie Skyhigh thread in the Woodman forum.
dap-addict wrote:lightman41 wrote:Read the Julie Skyhigh thread in the Woodman forum.
Sorry, I read and see some intentions, but still dont get it.
So the timeline is this?
1. Julie meets Vincent, he pursues her to do porn, both life from revenues, than in 2015 Vincent leaves her - after she decides to be less in front of camera.
2. In 2016 Julie meets a religious guy (= the "stranger"?), he makes her feel bad about her past and in effect of this in 2018 she commits suicide.
And now you say her suicide was a delayed effect of Vincent splitting with her and getting a new GF/wife? And basically that religious guy stranger wasnt any part of what happened later...
And just to understand some basics: Did she stop with porn when she was still with Vincent or only after going out with the religious stranger?
Btw, no question that EGO lier ape cannot have been a really close friend of Julie. That bs we dont have to discuss here even. Close friends act differently, although they sadly often cannot prevent suicides.
BlueShadow wrote:"Yes, but that's not a problem... I don't even care. She has been exclusive anal /DP for 5 years what can I say? Kiara is a true friend and she told me everything before she went. They respected her everything went well, she is happy, so no worries!!!
PW "
Why a model should tell a producer to work for other productions is out of my understanding, as if she would ask permission XD But yeah, we are talking about egoman control freak PW who thinks he is the godfather of porn XD
PS
Don't worry I won't bother you anymore on this subject. I've laughed enough already.
scarletxxx666 wrote:someone should invite pierre woodman to this forum & ask him to talk in this thread
he likes to post in other forums a lot so it would be very easy
he has 80000+ posts in his forum
Panorama wrote:Can anyone help me out with this?
In one of these two posts, Pierre says that the girls don't know anything about their casting initiation as it's this element that makes the scenes so natural. Yet in this other rant, he now says that "It is well stipulated that they are filmed permanently" which I take in the context of the statement and translation means it's made clear to them that they are being filmed the whole time they are there. Surely this means that he is either lying to his members or lying to the girls??
Also, if the model's DON'T know they are being filmed, or didn't understand the wording of the release, wouldn't this then leave them open to blackmail? Or, sometime in the future, he could just release the castings without their consent? Or worse still, should he pass away, somebody else could?
But if they already signed a release, why does Pierre keep asking some of them to sign one so that he can show their initiation?
BlueShadow wrote:Another girl exposed, ruined and instigated to cheat. Nothing New.
Now who is responsible for this? And above all who has gained more, ''''model'''' or him with the money he will earn with the scenes?
BlueShadow wrote:He act like an agent, or a pimp
scarletxxx666 wrote:BlueShadow wrote:He act like an agent, or a pimp
isnt he kinda a pimp????
pornstars are prostitutes, another type of prostitute, they get paid for getting fucked
he manages them (although i dont know how he manages them)
so i think hes probably a pimp or something????
also porn-prostitutes> prostitutes
so porn-pimp > pimp
Chubakka wrote:Does he can still get credits ,or buy officials ín Eastern Europe ?
Would be absurd not to get ín trouble with this " who da fuck.I ám" behaviour suing others for what he does for decades...
Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote:xxx wrote:Cgr69801QUvm_mYtbbqMt_r_p wrote:I have interesting information for xxx/wgcz's lawyers for upcoming legal case which supposedly is being today, but I can't post it without moderator approval. It aslo says that all the links I posted are banned, so that doesn't help either. So, if you need my help from a legal point of view, open up my account, so I can help your legal team or tell me where I can send my message so that you can directly send it to your lawyer team.
We will email you directly.
Well, I received your email on:
Fri, Jul 2, 11:08 AM.
I send all legal documentation and accompanying proof on: Tue, Jul 6, 8:43 PM
My reply got blocked. Your email address does not accept replies!
I tried again a couple of days later, Today: Fri, Jul 9, 10:20 PM.
Again my reply got blocked!
It's 14 pages of legal documentation that could be relevant for the upcumming court cases and/or pending police investigations.
Once your attorneys filter out the relevant information the police officers / judge presiding will exonerate you and all forum members of any and all allegations brought forth by Pierre André Nicolas Gerbier. So, contact me with a working email that accepts replies and accepts attachments (24 attachments and about 10-15mb in total).
scarletxxx666 wrote:his name is not woodman????
wtf
Panorama wrote:scarletxxx666 wrote:his name is not woodman????
wtf
No scarlettxxx it isn't! Woodman was a nickname given to him because he liked climbing trees when he was a youngster apparently. Personally, I think it was something back then that happened that turned him into what he is now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest