Giorgio Grandi wrote:Jack_Jackal43 wrote:Loool!! This has to be a rib by Giorgio to guys that complain about girls with tats. Hilarious Giorgio!!
Unfortunately it is not a revenge or stuff like this, it is a simple business factor:
1- Her "chassis" is hot as a fuck
2- She performers like a pro
3- She has a base of followers most of models do not have
Without to consider the point 3 is already enough to shoot her, point 1 and 2 add even more value to the performer.
So, tattoos are irrelevant at this point.
Overall, I thought that with a good camerawork and good action, she could be selling properly and this is what is happening.
I am myself very concerned about the tattoos (sales wise), but it is time also to consider that tattoos are part of the modern society and I need to move over the stigma of 'many tattoo=low sales". We can and have to shoot models with a lot of tattoo, we just needs to study a frame that can sell properly as the problem is not the tattoos, but the way we frame the model imho.
Hey, GG!
Look at it from another angle, there in your books, and if I'm wrong, ok.
The bizarrely tattooed girl will sell a lot, as it is an eye-pleasing option for those who have a fetish for it. Congratulations to her.
BUT, the vast majority of people who don't have extreme fetishes and just want a place where they can see charming, understated things, like girls' natural skin and breasts that don't look like an implanted bowling ball, will gradually lose interest in the platform, because every time you enter it there are just bizarre things happening on the timeline. And so, less general tickets, meaning other nice girls end up selling less because the audience that would see them, left, and then the site ends up becoming something about quantity and not quality.
For example: When we had Shrima Malati, Kitty Jane, Henessy, Jessyca Swan, Lucie Wild and others of the type as the standard, this site sold horrors, made fame, became the king of the internet. One girl was prettier and sexier than the other, the timeline was heaven. Nobody even thought about those shitty tattoos, piercings, cosplay colored hair and stuff for idiots like paying 20 tickets to see a homely girl suck your toe for 4 minutes or lick guys' assholes.
Today, most users spend weeks sifting through the timeline to find a video that works, when they enter. There's even one about "Chocolate" which, seriously, it's sick, disgusting, the person certainly has issues.
Another thing: Do you think most people who opt for piss versions want to see piss? A minority perhaps, who likes disgusting things. But in general they want to see more action time with the girl they chose, just that. Why buy the shortest video? And, seriously: Which girl really "loves" drinking piss? Who on earth could really like such a thing? It's not normal, it's minority fetish, it's disrespectful abuse of girls in a boring time that claims to be politically correct, and most girls just go along and smile for the money anyway, it's humiliating for them.
And one last one: "LegalPorno" is the powerful brand in the business, like Coca-Cola in porn, you are losing value in not managing it correctly. AnalVids is not a fucking brand, it's just a Pepsi or Guarana, and it's not even about anal anymore because it turned into piss and tattoos. Branding is missing there. No wonder they are losing quality to compete with stupid Tubes, which further highlights the previous issue: Bizarre alternative studios should be banned, they foul the timeline too much. Or should at least have more options for hiding crude studios.
Anyway. Nothing against the girl's personal tastes, I want her to be very happy, but it's like hiring a boy in a cap and shorts to be the company's lawyer, it destroys credibility. Fetishes should always be kept on a tight rein, lest they want to be an exception to become the rule, this usually destroys everything.
I might need these now.. hehe
