magizi87 wrote:I'm not sure how is everyone doing, but I can't buy all the scenes that I want to see. IMO adding more studios will only make the problem worse.
magizi87 wrote:I would love a one time charge for 1 year access.
gongobyte wrote:I think the ticket system is great, wish more sites would adopt it. Example compare LP to brazzers or 21s. While they have monthly subscription for around 20$, they may only release 4 scenes in a month that I enjoy, so if you go by the number of scenes I enjoy and actually download they end up being around the same price as LP, while at the same time LP delivers way more content. IMO it is much better to have too much to buy, rather then having money but nothing to buy.
dap-addict wrote:Its always better to get more offered than you can buy!
I dont mind 10 updates per day, even I cant buy them all.
xxx, still maybe think of a better long time client monthly ticket allocation as suggested by Gemini.
utopiaa wrote:I really think LP should advertise the free tickets members get and then scenes you can use them. It is really hard to find the list of scenes that are older than 1.5 years old.
xxx wrote:...we have grown a lot in the past year...
rimundinp wrote:Recently on this topic: viewtopic.php?f=101&t=8447&p=48916#p48916
Giorgio grandi say that it seems porn without humiliation are not interesting anymore.
But, is this real?
rimundinp wrote:I think the tickets are the problem...
if there was a fixed price with all scenes included would be much better.
Sometimes I don't download scenes because I am keeping tickets to see if better scenes arrive. The expectation is just too high.
I could spend 29 dollars/month fixed. but with tickets I normally buy 20 tickets each 2 months.
I would like to download all the scenes to see if what I like or what I don't (the same way I did on the old nrfta or 21sexture) but I am not rich.
So you keep charging high and getting less money than I could send to you.
And I think the majority of members think the same way as I do.
Only a little number of members that have infinite money buy all the scenes you make.
I'm not asking you to change the way you sell the scenes. It is just a call for reflection.
And, sorry sorry sorry for my terrible english.
pastaga wrote:IMO that ticket system is the best thing about LP : it shows directors what is bought or not, and makes customers feel they paid only for scenes they like.
If they have a money problem, they still can decide to shoot less scenes ( 3 per day is a lot !) and focus on whats succesful.
I'm personally a bit tired to see a girl who's un the buisness for a few years doing another DP... But if they add some extras why not.
It's ok for newbies, then, and that's why the latest scenes I bought were from Sineplex.
Then there's the personnal girl apreciation part, which is, well, personal.
xxx wrote:The ticket system allows us to pay external directors while giving them the freedom to shoot what they want (within certain limits as you know now).
I'm not making a cent on Giorgio or Sineplex's scenes : they get 100% of the money from those sales.
Even this way, they can lose money on certain scenes, so they have to choose carefully what they do.
As we get more customers (we have grown a lot in the past year) we can add more studios or lower prices.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:Which is approximately the same time frame that you have been releasing almost daily piss scenes. Coincidence?xxx wrote:...we have grown a lot in the past year...
pastaga wrote:IMO that ticket system is the best thing about LP : it shows directors what is bought or not, and makes customers feel they paid only for scenes they like.
If they have a money problem, they still can decide to shoot less scenes ( 3 per day is a lot !) and focus on whats succesful.
I'm personally a bit tired to see a girl who's un the buisness for a few years doing another DP... But if they add some extras why not.
It's ok for newbies, then, and that's why the latest scenes I bought were from Sineplex.
Then there's the personnal girl apreciation part, which is, well, personal.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:xxx wrote:...we have grown a lot in the past year...
Which is approximately the same time frame that you have been releasing almost daily piss scenes. Coincidence?
fapbastard wrote:Porn in general is becoming more hardcore. With things that you used to have to dig to find not becoming mainstream.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:fapbastard wrote:Porn in general is becoming more hardcore. With things that you used to have to dig to find not becoming mainstream.
This is just not true. American porn has been getting gradually softer and more politically correct for at least the last ten years, and the same is true (to a lesser extent) of European porn, especially since the Russian porn crackdown three years ago.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:American porn has been getting gradually softer and more politically correct for at least the last ten years, and the same is true (to a lesser extent) of European porn, especially since the Russian porn crackdown three years ago.
dap-addict wrote:Tastes Like Ass wrote:American porn has been getting gradually softer and more politically correct for at least the last ten years, and the same is true (to a lesser extent) of European porn, especially since the Russian porn crackdown three years ago.
Its sure true for US porn.
The Russian crackdown 3 years ago deprived Europorn of a vast pool of girls ready to do almost everything for comparably little money, thats the main problem.
Cash stripped only a few bigger studios can shoot the same more enveloppe pushing content with imported Russian cuties as transfer, housing etc. makes them quite expensive. But I hear after SOS successsful return to Piter some other wanna try it again. I thus would expect an increase in harder Europorn in 1-2 years again.
And good so!
WhynotmoreEuros wrote:Fetish porn is now front and center. Evil Angel has guys getting fucked in the ass with strapons...women getting fucked by transsexuals without a condom. Simulations of men watching their wives getting fucked by another guy and other deviant behavior? That shit is so mainstream, it's featured on the front page of porn distributors like data18.com 10 years ago, that filth was unknown to 90% of us.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:10 years ago(...) Back then, most anal scenes were at least 95% anal (and many had no pussy fucking at all)
Tastes Like Ass wrote:WhynotmoreEuros wrote:Fetish porn is now front and center. Evil Angel has guys getting fucked in the ass with strapons...women getting fucked by transsexuals without a condom. Simulations of men watching their wives getting fucked by another guy and other deviant behavior? That shit is so mainstream, it's featured on the front page of porn distributors like data18.com 10 years ago, that filth was unknown to 90% of us.
First of all, all of the stuff you mention has been around for much longer than 10 years.
Second, and more important, all this Evil Angel freak show shit, with guys getting fucked in the ass by strap-ons and trannies, has nothing to do with hardcore porn. In fact, it's exactly the kind of politically correct garbage that has replaced real hardcore porn. That's not what hardcore porn fans want to see. That's why they're the lowest-rated scenes on their site. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if EA was losing money on those scenes, and Stagliano was subsidizing them for PR purposes.
10 years ago, anal, DP, gangbangs and so on, were all much more common than they are now. Back then, most anal scenes were at least 95% anal (and many had no pussy fucking at all). Now, almost every anal scene is at least 50% pussy fucking. Back then, most anal scenes had at least 5 ATMs. Now, they rarely have more than 1 or 2 (and many have none at all). Back then, cumfart swallowing was such a common practice that there were several entire series devoted to that one fetish. Now, it's virtually unheard of.
I could go on and on, and that's not even including the guys that were really pushing the envelope, like Extreme Associates and Max Hardcore. Oh, wait, I guess Max wasn't hardcore enough for you, since he didn't let girls fuck him in the ass with a strap-on, right?
dap-addict wrote:Since 2000/1 I dont watch pussy only anymore in porn and always <FF> it, but I dont remember also in those 2001-5 scenes that I could just watch and enjoy 95% of anal scenes without my hand on the <FF>-botton.
WhynotmoreEuros wrote:1. Straw man. I said it was unknown to most of us, not that it didn't exist. It's now front and center on mainstream porn aggregation sites like data18 and freeones. That was absolutely not the case before, confirming what I said about the porn industry becoming more extreme.
2."Back then, most anal scenes had at least 5 ATMs." BULLSHIT. Often to get ATM you had to buy specific series with ATM as part of the title. You're just a goddamn liar, I don't know what else to bother with you.
3.Cumfart swallowing??? I hadn't even heard of the term "cumfart swallowing" until I came to LegalPorno. I've been watching a ton of porn for well beyond 10 years. Just go away. I'm thinking of blocking you for being a waste of time.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:So, maybe 95% was a slight exaggeration, but there was certainly far less pussy fucking than there is now. I recently watched 3 American gangbang scenes, and none of them was more than 25% anal! Truly pathetic.dap-addict wrote:Since 2000/1 I dont watch pussy only anymore in porn and always <FF> it, but I dont remember also in those 2001-5 scenes that I could just watch and enjoy 95% of anal scenes without my hand on the <FF>-botton.
Users browsing this forum: bake0213, Chimpy.677 and 24 guests