Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Moderators: aleksey_k, admin

User avatar
netzerkaiser
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 3757
Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 10:14 am
Karma: 0

Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby netzerkaiser » Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:08 pm

What percentage of blonde / red haired / fair haired women of ethnic Caucasian descent have naturally very little hair around nether region (backside) & not a mat that stretches to their hips at the front?

From my limited experience before shaving / trimming became de rigeur it was practically none. Yet I've seen magazine shoots from early 70's, Germanic / Scandinavian, where some ladies have very little hair, so there must be some.

Going further, I'm guessing psychologically for us hairy guys, that a great deal of our attraction to beautiful women is a bred in us expectation that they will be by nature hair free, just as their angelic faces suggest.

I also wonder, if women stopped shaving legs & arms & genitals, how many of us would find porn gross actually as a visual experience?

Why is this? For example, Cadence Lux... I find this most unappealing, but I don't understand why. :eek:

cad006GBP_366504100.jpg
Last edited by netzerkaiser on Fri Jun 11, 2021 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

smurf90
Established Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 7:19 am
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic & ass hair on women as nature intended

Postby smurf90 » Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:18 am

netzerkaiser wrote:What percentage of blonde / red haired / fair haired women of ethnic Caucasian descent have naturally very little hair around nether region (backside) & not a mat that stretches to their hips at the front?

From my experience before shaving / trimming became de rigeur it was practically none. Yet I've seen magazine shoots from early 70's, Germanic / Scandinavian, where some ladies have very little hair, so there must be some.

Going further, I'm guessing psychologically for us hairy guys, that a great deal of our attraction to beautiful women is a bred in us expectation that they will be by nature hair free, just as their angelic faces suggest.

My goodness, whatever it says about me when I was younger (1990's), to get intimate with a British girlfriend & to see she was as hairy as me down under was a real dampner.

The angel in your head suddenly became a living breathing ape, just like us.

I also wonder, if women stopped shaving legs & arms & genitals, how many of us would find porn gross actually as a visual experience? I'd probably be one.

Why is this? For example, Cadence Lux... I find this most unappealing, but I don't understand why. To be honest, she might as well have a pair of big hairy balls down there :eek:


cad006GBP_366504100.jpg


Shave that nasty shit off.

scarletxxx666
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:54 am
Location: hell
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby scarletxxx666 » Mon Jun 14, 2021 7:35 pm

pubic hair is supposed to be long

so their hair is not as nature intended either

short hair is ugly

also vaginas are kinda ugly apart from that
women may look divine-like but their genitals look pathethic specially when aroused
dark femenine

101mike101
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 3:57 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby 101mike101 » Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:20 pm

Liking or disliking hair is a matter of habit and current fashion.

Men naturally grow hair on their faces too. But in western countries, almost nobody lets their facial hair grow naturally. Even men, who have beards, usually trim their beards and shave off some hair in some places.

This kind of thing is cultural and a matter of fashion and habit. Which can change and become the reverse for one reason or another.

User avatar
Bummer-Harris
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:07 am
Location: In her asshole.
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby Bummer-Harris » Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:51 pm

netzerkaiser wrote:
I also wonder, if women stopped shaving legs & arms & genitals, how many of us would find porn gross actually as a visual experience?


Personally I love hairy women: Bush, asshole, armpits and legs.

It makes me chuckle the response to a hairy women invokes in users of this forum.
Especially so in the light of the types of action offered by the website.

TheVulture
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:26 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby TheVulture » Sun Jun 20, 2021 12:30 am

It's interesting, because that picture of Cadence Lux is very similar to the porn I would have first seen as a teenager and found incredibly arousing. But yes, now I expect to see good pussy grooming both in porn and real life (and especially in porn - you can understand to a greater extent in real life) and I find that pic a bit "urgh". It's just a sign of the times I guess. I read a good book about Britain in the 1990s a few years ago (politics, culture, quite broad-ranging) and it actually made a brief mention about the rise of pubic grooming amongst the general population, which it linked to the explosion of cable TV porn channels in the early 90s. That does sound about right time-wise.

From a personal point of view I started doing it probably in the late 90s in my early 20s and have continued ever since. It's just a lot better on several levels IMHO.

I suppose it's just 1 of those things where once most people have tried it they stick with it. And if someone is a sex performer (either male or female) I really don't see any good reason why they wouldn't find it more pleasurable to be shaved/well groomed.

With porn girls I'm not of the hardcore "totally shaved" faction. I like that but prefer a well groomed bit of bush up top (must be neat). With porn guys I generally think take it all off (and especially the balls) partly because that's my own preference.
More non-manhandle scenes please. Hands away from face/neck/shoulders. Keep the girls loose, free and expressive. Don't overpower them - let them sizzle! Keep the heels on. More panties pulled to one side. More skirts/tight dresses. More 0% pussy scenes.

analwithyourgirl
 

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby analwithyourgirl » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:33 am

Bummer-Harris wrote:
netzerkaiser wrote:
I also wonder, if women stopped shaving legs & arms & genitals, how many of us would find porn gross actually as a visual experience?


Personally I love hairy women: Bush, asshole, armpits and legs.

It makes me chuckle the response to a hairy women invokes in users of this forum.
Especially so in the light of the types of action offered by the website.

And what do you do with all hair on your tongue after eating a girl out?

House MD
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:16 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby House MD » Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:51 pm

analwithyourgirl wrote:
Bummer-Harris wrote:
Personally I love hairy women: Bush, asshole, armpits and legs.

It makes me chuckle the response to a hairy women invokes in users of this forum.
Especially so in the light of the types of action offered by the website.

And what do you do with all hair on your tongue after eating a girl out?


I would make a pie out of that chicks butthole hairs and enjoy each of her shit-besmirched asshole hair melting on my tongue
cad006GBP_366504100.jpg

User avatar
nelson_sanchez
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:36 am
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby nelson_sanchez » Thu Jun 24, 2021 5:19 pm

NO

Pedrolito
Established Member
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 8:47 am
Karma: 0

Re: Pubic hair on women as nature intended

Postby Pedrolito » Fri Jun 25, 2021 6:10 am

cad006GBP_366504100.jpg
[/quote]

I love that hairy ass ! And I love to see a hairy ass like this gaping. Not a big fan of all-shaved genitals. A little bit of hair is the secret ingredient :D


Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ewood1207, Google [Bot] and 24 guests