by mydirtydigs151 » Wed Jun 09, 2021 12:49 am
A black or dark setting with excellent/proper lighting/spots/floods, seems to portray the natural tones of the model's bits the closest.
Too much white with full ambient lighting creates whitewashing, results in adjusting saturation to compensate and hinders the visual experience
* Many Cindy Shine, Mina, Megan Venturi etc., had terrible saturation/contrast levels and hindered the visual experience; like how the obscene camera-clicking interferes with the immersive audio experience.
* Darkko films tend to go to the other extreme of contrast/saturation; but his films remain 'clearer' and crisp.
- Grey walls are better in preventing this or darker furniture in a white room.
* The grey couch made a lot of difference in the white room in regards to reducing white-washing.
It's all really about how the colour palate filters out, or mixes with what's going on....
- Too much reds to yellow messes up the contrast of skin tones and pinks as much as too much white ambience.
- Many of the above examples using bright coloured bedding would probably be better used in a darker ambient setting or very direct bright ambience, so they don't colour-wash out the tones of the skin or pussy-pink.
* Very dark-skinned models are more suited to the general examples of colour palates, but it's all about proper ambient and direct lighting.
InterracialVision started of very strong visually. They upped the clarity significantly. But after a year or so, started to slid into the white-washing and the awful offensive camera clicking.
* Either the camera broke, or people just don't get that they shouldn't wear bracelets, watches, shirt cuffs etc., while holding the camera.
When AmericanAnal started releasing stuff here...the colour palate, contrast and clarity became my personal standard to what porn should 'look' like....
* NRX-studio started following suit.
Giorgio'sLAbs improves a little when the blue palate is utilized.
Firstgape and Sineplex films had better saturation/contrast/clarity than many newer films.
The South American studios vary too much, but the models when visiting Europe are far too washed out.
* They would look amazing in AA film format! Just saying.
If it's more about the camera's range quality, I highly recommend getting whatever gear was used in AA, BlackedRaw etc films.
The sex act may be what we want to see, but clarity, colour palate, contrast and saturation quality can make an otherwise excellent scene, relatively unwatchable in the age of High-definition.
* It can also make a rather lackluster scene..... more visually stimulating.
Otherwise, it starts to appear that things are filmed in 720p and then upgraded to 1080+, or that editing is done on a much smaller monitor; where the picture looks better regardless, but doesn't translate well to a larger screen.
* editing should be done on at least a 50 inch UHD/4k screen.
As far as home base goes....if upgraded gear isn't invested in:
Turn down the general ambient lighting, and utilize more spots/floods: think stage theatre.
"You can tell the difference between a Starlet and a woman who is just doing it for the money. Starlets do it as a lifestyle and enjoyment, the money is a secondary bonus, the difference shines through during the act." - Sharon Mitchell