Why FFM is no longer shot

[ntrxxx995]

I think many of LP customers come from Sineplex era, or from seeing these movies on xvideos, where they are very popular. That times and people who made it possible are gone, but the thing I can't understand is why whole genre was cancelled as well.

One of recognizable features of these series was heavy use of FFM. Triple Stacked covered FFFM, in HC from time to time you got MMFF or MMF. After Sineplex shutdown, FFM was still shot for Gonzo and Gorgio from time to time, then it was stopped as well. Nowadays we have hardcore gangbangs, and that's it. Some people may say "the more the better", but there is a substantial difference between FFM and FFM+. In first case single man dominates the scene, in second he is a part of the crowd. These are two separate fantasies.

Anal FFM with ATOGM is a kind of genre itself, and for a long time LP was grandmaster of it. Now LP covers multiple genres from multiple providers, yet the core genre that made it great is completly abandoned. I'm not here to question current direction of LP, they do what brings them cash, even if it doesn't fit my taste. But why not shoot some FFM scene from time time, as it may please different audience and bring some extra buck? Heck, it would be nice to buy for once scene that is less than 5 years old.

[nelson_sanchez]

good question, stupendous question........i do hope all directors and produces read this......cause the main attraction is the girl not the guys and people aren't interested in seen a lucky dude.

[OKCTwister]

Through this question you're just reiterating for the nth time the paradigm of asking for pizza in a Chinese restaurant or noodles in a French bistro
How many times do we have to say that this is a website specialized in Xon1 DP/DAP gangbangs and there are scores of websites that offer outstanding FFM content way better than LP does
I seriously think Analvids should consider creating a FAQ section compiling such retarded requests

[ntrxxx995]

How many times do we have to say that this is a website specialized in Xon1 DP/DAP gangbangs and there are scores of websites that offer outstanding FFM content way better than LP does

No, there aren't other sites doing it in LP style. Hence I ask here, and nowhere else.

I don't quarrel with specialization. But specialization doesn't mean they shoot only that and nothing else. Even now, they still shoot 1v1. So if they shoot mostly Xon1, and accasionally 1v1, they may as well from time to time shoot FFM, instead of another FFM+. I see no reason not to. It's not like FFM and FFMM are so much different from production perspective, it's not like u need different talent for that. And amount of questions in this direction you mention only underlines demand for it.

The wole argument "we shoot only FFM+, even though there is demand for FFM as well, and we have all tools for that, but we don't care" is not only not obious, it's just seems stupid.

[Eloise]

Through this question you're just reiterating for the nth time the paradigm of asking for pizza in a Chinese restaurant or noodles in a French bistro
How many times do we have to say that this is a website specialized in Xon1 DP/DAP gangbangs and there are scores of websites that offer outstanding FFM content way better than LP does
I seriously think Analvids should consider creating a FAQ section compiling such retarded requests

This.
Exáctly this.

[Jocke]

Not true!

You don't have to go back five years, just to January to get one of the best scenes in my mind and it is FFFFM.
I fully agree that the price should be set by the number of women per scene minus the number of blokes.
It has to be very special if I should buy scenes with single women.
I don't think LP should stop doing single women gangbangs, I just wish there were more pairings. At the moment I get more great scenes than I have the time to watch so no problem.

Epiphany arrives late, 4 thirsty sheep get fucked by the shepherd and Drink a lot of Pee, with Balls Deep Anal, ATOGM GIO1702
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/214723

[Jack_Jackal43]

Because with FFM the focus will be on the guy. It’s fine if you’re bisexual or a woman but most people on this site are straight men who like to see multiple men fuck one woman (the main focus). The ratio of dick to woman should never be less than 1:1

Just my 2 cents.

[InsideA41YearOldGirl]

That is one of the biggest lies I've ever seen and I've never heard this in my life before. Japanese porn produces loads of FFM, FFFM, FFFFM, and even FFFFFFFFFFM porn every year and nobody ever told me before their focus was the guy when there were four or more breasts and two or more female asses on screen. When there is so much more female meat on screen the camera will focus on the females because they predominate on the screen.

What I've seen bisexuals actually share on Tumblr and Reddit are exactly gifs of multi-male scenes of this very site because they do think two men rubbing their penises against each other inside a girl is an bisexual act, or at least bordering on it.

[ntrxxx995]

Because with FFM the focus will be on the guy. It’s fine if you’re bisexual or a woman but most people on this site are straight men who like to see multiple men fuck one woman (the main focus). The ratio of dick to woman should never be less than 1:1
Just my 2 cents.

Like, wut? Yo're saying one dude fucking multiple women is bisexual? That is most absurd thing I have ever read on this forum. Straight male want to fuck 2 or 3 girls at once, and it's natural, that's why this fantasy is so strong and why original Sineplex works were so damn successfull. There is nothing hot for a straight male in adding more dicks to the scene, it only shutters immertion. With one guy, focus is on what he fucks, what u fuck in ur mind. With a multiple dicks, as a typical male you're distracted. Whole point of multiple dicks is about girl having it harder, which is another level of porn, and yeah I get that some folks may reach it. But you should know, my fellow pig, that it doesn't make you more heterosexual, just more twisted. No pun intended, we're all here twisted. Fucking teenage girl in ass and then go oral with other teen is twisted as fuck, yet I love it with all my heart.

And actually, when it all started, I thought that LP is opening itself to women, cos in terms of "typical" gangbang is much more often women than men fantasy. Just check any xchat/reddistrict site - women try to get gangbang, men try to get it reverse.

[House MD]

Reverse gangbang is eroticism not porn
It's boring softcore nonsense that would make LP crumble to some banal female-friendly shit site

[avanfurwet]

Looking back at some of my favourite models from a "classic" era of LP (Ginger Fox, Maria Devine), they made some great reverse gangbang and FFM scenes.

Personally I think making porn more female-friendly is a good thing, and females have a wide range of fantasies, for example Anna De Ville's kidnap scene yesterday.

I think the biggest problem in a reverse gangbang scene is placing the "spare" females on screen doing something interesting and not just being passive spectators.
But an inventive director and models who can enjoy girl-girl interaction can solve that. And now that scenes are featuring more girls peeing on each other, this can add another ingredient to an FFM scene.

[jackswallows]

Because the producers can't afford loosing money, 2 girls means production cost is almost double, video making style is not changing, same room, same action, same male models, same jar, same type of videos again and again, only the models change. people get bored, noone buys & producers sinks, they try to reduce the cost of production, price increase... Collapses everything ultimately.. that's the truth...

[ntrxxx995]

Well I am not talking about reverse gangabangs, I am talking about FFM. But even in case of reverse gangbangs - one nigger going DT with let's say 5 young girls, then straight into ass, and switches atogm between girls. Finishes gooey buns style, one girl gets anal crempie, others share the cum. Well if that's "female friendly softcore" then we live on different planet mate. Ask your gf.

Because the producers can't afford loosing money, 2 girls means production cost is almost double, video making style is not changing, same room, same action, same male models, same jar, same type of videos again and again, only the models change. people get bored, noone buys & producers sinks, they try to reduce the cost of production, price increase... Collapses everything ultimately.. that's the truth...

Okay, and doing gangbangs all over again is someone different? Porin in general is repetitive, and it's normal thing, as sex is repetetive. Also, looks like u compare FFM to 1v1. From this perspective, yeah, another model to pay. But I'm talking about situation, when instead of doing 10 gangbangs LP does 9 gangbangs and one FFM. So cost it's actual even cheaper, and you satisfy some part of the audiance, that is buying mostly old cheap stuff. I think it's a win-win situation, hence this thread - why this is not happening. We can argue whole day about direction, comparing fetishes, et cetera, but at the of the day it's bucks that matters.

And the fact that this topic comes back all around in different disguise only confirms the fact I started with - there is high demand among LP audiance for such content, and it's easy for LP to do it. It may be another site on LP updated weekly, I don't care. But to provide some motivation for spending some money for all these guys gathered on LP from FFM xvideos free content makes only sense. Am I stupid, and can't see something obvious that LP producers does?

[House MD]

Well I am not talking about reverse gangabangs, I am talking about FFM. But even in case of reverse gangbangs - one nigger going DT with let's say 5 young girls, then straight into ass, and switches atogm between girls. Finishes gooey buns style, one girl gets anal crempie, others share the cum. Well if that's "female friendly softcore" then we live on different planet mate. Ask your gf.

FFM is the worst kind of erotic porn French TV like RTL9 broadcast at 10pm on a week day to fill up airing slots
and the anal, ATM, switching a single dick between 5, 10, 15... 50 girls is the most mind numbing stuff that gets me sleeping on the couch or switching channel
Go get those lame videos from tube websites, amateur pussies and squirters

Here on Analvids we are a horde of angry dicks that want 100% 7on1 double anal gangbangs with Monster dicks where a multitasking ragdoll is being impaled until her holes turn red, sore, swollen and puffy

This is not a website for weak bladders, so get your ffm garbage on lamefemalefriendlyfacefk.com and call me in the morning

[Jocke]

Here on Analvids we are a horde of angry dicks that want 100% 7on1 double anal gangbangs with Monster dicks where a multitasking ragdoll is being impaled until her holes turn red, sore, swollen and puffy

This is not a website for weak bladders, so get your ffm garbage on lamefemalefriendlyfacefk.com and call me in the morning

Speak for yourself, others may have more refined taste.

[davebowman]

I'm not against some FFM on occasion, just for a bit of variety. That said, one of the main selling points of this site is the amount of double anal, so you might need one of the girls wearing a strap-on for a bit, or at least putting some kind of dildo up there whilst the guy is pounding away. Dylan's solo girl scenes are always pretty intense, so it might be fun to see how he copes with two girls at once.

I expect ultimately it's just a budgetary decision though - male talent is cheap, girls are not, so it's easy to see why producers lean this way.

[Jocke]

Well, I prioritise buying scenes with more than one girl to push for more. I don't mind that there is a majority of "many dicks one girl" scenes as long as there is a sufficient amount of what I prefer.
It would be nice if we all could favor our favorites without asking for cancellation of other people's favorites. With tens of thousands of scenes there could be porn for everybody!

[ntrxxx995]

It would be nice if we all could favor our favorites without asking for cancellation of other people's favorites. With tens of thousands of scenes there could be porn for everybody!

My point exactly. Like I said before, even in times when FFM was Sineplex mainstream, there were separate serie, Hardcore Climax, for more intense tastes. If market changes it's only natural to change production direction, but why abondon previous style completly.

[House MD]

Exactly, even if FFM hemorrhages cash the most important thing is to put each and everybody's egocentric whims and fancies forward

[dap-addict]

Based on local going anal fee, which is the only thing LP compatible you can do in FFM, FF is 2-3 times more expensive than adding just another stud. GIO could finance the .gif-ed Befana FFFFM only thanks to a 3-part shot adding two classical gangbang parts.
It would remain to be tested whether FFM really sells enough to get it financed at its own. I could imagine Pineapples Test Kitchen to try that out in a 1-time-est in old SOS Piter style.

Me I joined only after old Sineplex had gone. I need MMF minimum. I have no interest in FFM at all. But that doenst mean it couldn't be sold at all nor it couldn't be made hard enough to fit LP's new ticket.