Mordecai35 wrote:
The whole TAP thing It's hard to even get, the guys have to compile in such a way it looks almost silly. It's almost like a circus act. Hehe.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:After reminiscing on the Isabella Clark scene (http://legalporno.com/watch/29062/isabe ... _dap_sz670) it just showed me how despite calling for as much DP as possible I do like a DAP fix on LP, too!
dap-addict wrote:I Couldnt find my 80% of scenes dap option, but still voted for an option allowing dp still. As my gift to you!
IF all daps were as intense and deep fucked as your gifs, I would take more dap of course. But we all know how difficult it is to perform for the girls.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Beautiful models, intense sex and balls deep anal, DP, DAP and DPP!!! Tip fucking is illegal and won't be tolerated on LP.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Unlike you, I really don't care how much DAP is produced as long as it is balls deep and intense!
(...) the only reason companies exists is to make profit. That is why I can't figure out what LP Sineplex is doing. I feel LP Sineplex invented this hardcore stuff but lost there way and LP Gonzo has perfected it.
dap-addict wrote:The more dap LP produces the higher the chance to get the right intensity with double balls deep fucks!
dap-addict wrote:In my opinion LP has yet to set its respected Prague standard for girls interested to work for their studio...which implies what most of Giorgio Grandis knew in Piter: No hard anal = no job & no dap = not much work.
dap-addict wrote:And if I tried to limit DP in the past its just because I really cant stand pussy only fucking in porn anymore and DP has become way soft when a company like LP offers a new approach to hardcore porn....
dap-addict wrote:LP Sineplex (SOS in Piter again) makes only sense in business terms if xxx manages to tap that cheaper talent pool again. Either he plans to import the girls to the LP Gonzo studio in Prague or set up an own studio later in Piter. All other considerations would be nich market expansion only.
dap-addict wrote:And if I tried to limit DP in the past its just because I really cant stand pussy only fucking in porn anymore and DP has become way soft when a company like LP offers a new approach to hardcore porn....
In the past, you try and limit it everyday!
Since when has DP become pussy only!
DP soft in your mind only. DP natural progression from Anal, so following your progression LP should be 100% DAP or 100% DPP. I know I don't want to see that.
dap-addict wrote:LP Sineplex (SOS in Piter again) makes only sense in business terms if xxx manages to tap that cheaper talent pool again. Either he plans to import the girls to the LP Gonzo studio in Prague or set up an own studio later in Piter. All other considerations would be nich market expansion only.
I really disagree, why cheaper talent we pay a premium per scene. LP is the most expensive site on the market because of its only pay for what you like model but I love it. So just like members begging for Mea Melone we finally got her at a premium that LP transferred to us and if we wanted to see more of her then the ticket sales would show if we didn't want to pay that price then she would not be asked to do anymore LP scenes because LP would be taking a loss. I would assume she was worth every penny as she did several scenes with LP and proved to be a very talented asset!
Mordecai35 wrote:Right now my favorite scenes are one girl w/ 3-4 guys. DP is a must, DAP is great, but on the condition the girl is comfortable enough for it not to be painful or an issue with her to an extent she quits doing scenes.
The whole TAP thing It's hard to even get, the guys have to compile in such a way it looks almost silly. It's almost like a circus act. Hehe.
dap-addict wrote:What are you talking about?!
LP forces no girl to dap!!!
kidloco wrote:...even if they will finally agree (under the pressure?), they will know they shouldn't...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests