otto1219 wrote:@OKCTwisterThese kinds of scenes are censured by today's porn industry
Why is that so and is it a matter of legality or "artistic vision" by the directors? People have been asking for this forever, it seems.
otto1219 wrote:@OKCTwisterIn short, censoring these acts is a useful hypocrisy to them but I'm confident a new school of thought would break this taboo and take over the industry just like Gonzo did
I think you're giving them too much credit to think there's enough conscious thought to lead to hypocrisy. To me, it appears most directors are just slapping the scenes together based on a predetermined timeline with a check box for different positions, many awkward and difficult to capture photographically, unnatural, borderline boring, and watchful of the time so they don't run over their booked times.
I'd be interested in Mister Ananas' thoughts on the topic of "censoring." Of the directors here he's the only one who actually engages the membership with thoughtful replies.
So, you're saying that those scenes you listed (yes, I'd like more of those) are too nasty/controversal for porn, but a foot up a tranny's ass or a piss shower after a facial is not? I like your idea much better than the freakshow circus acrobatics and feigned dominance we are presented with, but censored? I just think they've too often lost the concept of prurient interest with no redeeming social value() in a pornographic milieu. Or, just as probable, they just don't care as long as tickets are sold.
That said, I hope your assessment is more correct than mine.
Users browsing this forum: maimunata, simone.urbinati and 33 guests