GONZO - SOS - GIO comparision

[dap-addict]

Today I liked them all thus maybe good to do it today:

All 3 scenes are bgg thus little variety, little to choose from, but nice girls for sure.
I usually avoid watching too much porn with one stud only as from two studs onwards there is a chance for dap, but as I said nice girls here.
Really pleased to see Jessica Malone fucked with her cute titties revealed, had waited eagerly for that! Now best option for me being offered bgg only today for sure is 0% pussy garanteed as I really dont want to run into pussy fucking only consuming my daily morning porn fix! Thus really once again big thanks to xxx for opening this sub-line!!!
http://legalporno.com/watch/29153/chris ... ussy_sz689

Gladly today GIO offers the same - no pussy fucking by Serge at all!
http://legalporno.com/watch/29332/marga ... exclusive_
On top with two of my favorite late GG girls Mya Dark and Maragrete, some really hot dark haired Russian gape cuties!
This scene is even better than GONZO.com for me as the girls are done up better waring stockings all scene. Nice fishnets indeed! I also somehow prefer that staged fake lez theme when Serge actually makes them share his cum instead of them doing itself. Its a nice added feature!

Now SOS...
http://legalporno.com/watch/29326/nina_ ... atogm_rs21
Of course I go for the brand new girl (to me) Nina Heaven and I am curious how she handles BBC, but I already know I will get lots of pussy fucking because SOS always arranges for that, never instructs his studs to go STA it seems. I go past, its fine, its a new girl after all...and also Suzie Q. is there and I am curious how she handles BBC. Well, fine! But next time I dont pay it probabely - the more its shot in Piter and the girls did it probabely for quite cheep.

My assessment:
GONZO today - 4/10
GIO today - 5/10
SOS today - 3/10 (compared to Alysas first scene shot by SOS its 1/10)

What were your feelings?
Which scene(s) you buy?

[Pineapples Studio]

Gonzo is a well-oiled machine at this point. All the moving parts are in place and they do their job like clockwork. Not a whole lot of innovation or variety, but they do what they do very well.

Sineplex SOS has the variety. Kreme, gapefarts, different ratios of guys and girls (not constant 4 on 1)... there is something for everybody there, as long as you like anal.

I hate to say it, but I get the sense that Giorgio has no idea what the hell he is doing. Girls vomiting piss into a bowl? What the fuck? Nobody wants to see that.

...

The highest rating you gave any of them was a 5/10? Really? Even Giorgio doesn't deserve that.

Gonzo - 7.5/10
Sineplex - 9/10
Giorgio - 6/10

Gonzo would score a point higher if they stopped shooting so many goddamn piss swallowing 4 on 1 sausage fest scenes. Sineplex still edges them out on camera work, though.

For a 10/10, a studio has to shoot EXACTLY what I like to watch on a consistent basis, so it's pretty much impossible for anyone to score a 10/10 on my scale. (Unless they are me.)

[magizi877]

From the top of my head.... and I'm mostly judging scenes that contain one girl and two or more dudes.

Gio has the best camera work. He probably does a lot of talking to the girl to explain how she looks best while getting fucked to boost her confidence and to the men so they don't obscure the action from the camera. He is very good at capturing the action from the right spot, and usually persuades girls to use very large toys and do plenty of DP positions, Also he seems to put a lot of emphasis on the girl ass, which I also prefer. The dudes often do balls deep penetration and almost no tip fucking and when they do it, it's usually on purpose to show an ass gaping, which is good. I hope he gets to direct scenes where Blanche Bradburry is performing.
As negatives go, It seems like he runs on a lower budget because his scenes have shadows, video rendering issues, and I think he never works with actors who are not white, which is a bummer. The pictures are also the best sets.

GONZO has been hit or miss for me. Some scenes I really like, and some scenes get deleted immediately haha. IMO they have the most inconsistent camera work. A lot tip fucking and jerky motions (what I mean is: the male looks like is fucking the girl very hard but the penetration is poor). AND A LOT OF PISS that is barely visible. But they have the best performers both male (In terms of performace kid jamaica and mike are the best for me) and female (best looking anyhow), and I like that they try to get the girls we request. And it sounds the go through a lot of trouble to get new girls. Also the slew of DAP's is amazing, although I would still prefer balls deep DP that is very lengthy or vigorous (why not both?).

SINEPLEX has been focusing a lot on multiple girl scenes, and they been searching for fresh talent. But I'm just not a fan of multiple girls per scene. I have to admit the girls they got are very good looking though. The black dude they got, that usually wears a baseball cap, he needs to start fucking the girls properly though. I would have purchased more of their scenes, but he is just not doing enough to the girls. I'm not asking "hey get rid of him" I'm saying he could be loads better.

[dap-addict]

The highest rating you gave any of them was a 5/10? Really? Even Giorgio doesn't deserve that.

EP, I dont give more than 5/10 for scenes with more girls than studs (lest its a 2on3 with lots of dap).
Giorgio was almost perfect, just the lighting sucked a bit as almost always.
But 6 points and more are for 2on1 scenes only.

Btw, I see we have the same scenes today again... Would be nice if some more consumers could assess them! Thanks!

[Tastes Like Ass]

I haven't seen any of these 3 scenes yet (I'm having some temporary technical problems that have kept me from downloading the most recent scenes). However, generally speaking, I think all three studios have their strengths and weaknesses:

Gonzo Strengths: Very good in technical quality (sharp picture, clear audio, lighting, etc.) Also very good about listening to the forum feedback and implementing suggestions. Lots of DAP and piss scenes. Top male performers.
Gonzo Weaknesses: Very inconsistent camerawork, often with too many closeups, too much camera movement, and missing important stuff. Too much emphasis on gangbangs (although this has improved recently). Some scenes lack ATM.

Sineplex Strengths: Very solid camerawork. Nice variety (different number of girls, different number of guys, different types of action, different fetishes, etc.) Some very nice fresh faces that we haven't seen elsewhere.
Sineplex Weaknesses: Technical issues (bad lighting, graininess, pixelation, etc.) Action in some scenes is not nasty enough to fit in with the LP/Sineplex tradition. Poor male performers (lots of tipfucking, wood problems, etc.)

Giorgio* Strengths: Very solid camerawork. Gets straight down to business, without excessive gimmicks, tease, or foreplay. Lots of gorgeous girls from the Russian Golden Age, many of whom are now retired. Good male performers.
Giorgio* Weaknesses: Lots of technical problems (blurriness, pixelation, etc.) Not enough variety (too many 1-on-1 scenes, mostly with similar types of action). Some scenes lack ATM, and a few of them lack any anal action at all.

*I am talking here about the old Giorgio scenes. Obviously, I can't judge the new ones, since I haven't seen them yet.

[dap-addict]

How old that all reads!
SOS is gone.
But some issues with both others stay.
Most progress judging from the above is for gonzo. Quite surprised!