Recent doggy DAP double standards

Moderator: dan

User avatar
dap-addict
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 40367
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:57 am
Karma: 1

Recent doggy DAP double standards

Postby dap-addict » Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:14 am

Recently N&F seems to reduce DAP to the easily performable doggy position only, while focusing more on DPP and DP in 2-3 positions. Thats way too much disproportion for me. :( :confused:

Also we have the not billed because unplanned Freya Dee doggy DAP by Oscar Batty here:
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/155888 (NF040)

vs.

The billed but same short planned Lady Zee doggy DAP, same 1,5minutes only, same 2 takes only:
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/155945 (NF041)

Looks like quite confusing double standards to me.
But worst is DAP got reduced to an absolute minimum while DPP and DP get much more attention. Hoping this post leads to a more balanced DAP approach @ N&F again!
ex-Eurobabeforum DAPlist responsible - PM contact: dap-a@seznam.cz
TWO DAP SCENES PER DAY! - More true fast balls deep DAP! More 0% pussy! - Dress them to fuck and pop their eyes - Heels on! No condoms!!! - Lets lets get a GONZO non-vanilla successor!!!

User avatar
dap-addict
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 40367
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:57 am
Karma: 1

Re: Recent doggy DAP double standards

Postby dap-addict » Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:23 am

742.jpg
Billed Lady Zee DAP @ NF041.


vs.

822.jpg
Un-billed Freya Dee DAP @ NF040.



Btw, looks like for Lady Zee there was also a cgDAP by Mike planned, but she couldn't perform it. Such is suggested by sudden cut to DP.
ex-Eurobabeforum DAPlist responsible - PM contact: dap-a@seznam.cz
TWO DAP SCENES PER DAY! - More true fast balls deep DAP! More 0% pussy! - Dress them to fuck and pop their eyes - Heels on! No condoms!!! - Lets lets get a GONZO non-vanilla successor!!!

User avatar
FloraneRussell
Verified model
 
Posts: 746
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 6:39 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Recent doggy DAP double standards

Postby FloraneRussell » Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:45 am

at plan are alltime 3-4 or DPP positions. but sometime can hapen girl have problem. it can be anything, tired, pain, bad mood, or just bad day. and we have 2 options Cancell scene or shoot what is she possible to do. And if we cancell u will no see ur girls :D

paobroncix01
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 3:42 pm
Karma: 0

Re: Recent doggy DAP double standards

Postby paobroncix01 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:09 pm

FloraneRussell wrote:at plan are alltime 3-4 or DPP positions. but sometime can hapen girl have problem. it can be anything, tired, pain, bad mood, or just bad day. and we have 2 options Cancell scene or shoot what is she possible to do. And if we cancell u will no see ur girls :D


Very good to hear that DPP is important for N&F studio. The DPP scenes so far from N&F studios are very good ones.

drevokocur66
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:36 am
Karma: 0

Re: Recent doggy DAP double standards

Postby drevokocur66 » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:20 pm

dap-addict wrote:Recently N&F seems to reduce DAP to the easily performable doggy position only, while focusing more on DPP and DP in 2-3 positions. Thats way too much disproportion for me. :( :confused:

Also we have the not billed because unplanned Freya Dee doggy DAP by Oscar Batty here:
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/155888 (NF040)

vs.

The billed but same short planned Lady Zee doggy DAP, same 1,5minutes only, same 2 takes only:
https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/155945 (NF041)

Looks like quite confusing double standards to me.
But worst is DAP got reduced to an absolute minimum while DPP and DP get much more attention. Hoping this post leads to a more balanced DAP approach @ N&F again!


Would you like some cheese with that?
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you're honest with them, then you're an asshole.


Return to N&F STUDIO

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests