dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Uhhmmm, Sara amazes me every new scene! I never thought of her as a seductress but wow I was wrong !!!
Agree. And somebody affirms she has an unattractive body...
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Uhhmmm, Sara amazes me every new scene! I never thought of her as a seductress but wow I was wrong !!!
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:Another InstantBuy from Sara and it includes DV which is rare on this site, niceMore more more please!!!
hjohjole wrote:And yet another DP scene from Gonzo studio with Sara Bell. What a surprise!
This makes the 11th DP scene in a row with Sara since the last non DP scene. And good thing, this is exactly what we needed since there was only two other DP scenes among today's updates.
What will they come up with next? Maybe another DP scene? You know what, i bet it will be another DP scene.
xxx wrote:DP's tend to sell more. Blame the people who don't buy what you like instead of the production.
xxx wrote:DP's tend to sell more.
Only at gonzo.xxx wrote:DP's tend to sell more. Blame the people who don't buy what you like instead of the production.
dap-addict wrote:Also don´t wanna support this new vanilla trend.
dap-addict wrote:Have you ever been on a porn shot, Wotan?
This is not private sex, but entertainment, a show.
Most girls can't get into it on porn sets anyway, no matter what sex act!
Its just that pussy only sex or DP is easier to perform and thus easier to fake they were into.
But a good girl can also fake a DAPgasm.
And a very good one can get it actually.
But they are rare! Real orgasms are rare in porn. Just face it!
kuaheyden513 wrote:More 0% Pussy and more blacks, more cumfarting(REAL CUM) for Sara.
![]()
ryukenmaster666 wrote:Amazing as usual with Sara.
She is a good exemple of professionalism, where some just pretend (can't count so many fake "piss drinking" tags), she genuinly drinks the piss, as models should
Drinking 2 big glasses full of piss (and cum)
dap-addict wrote:Only at gonzo.xxx wrote:DP's tend to sell more. Blame the people who don't buy what you like instead of the production.
Anyway, I dont buy Sara Bell DPs.
Also dont wanna support this new vanilla trend.
But I do understand that a 2on1 DP is pretty low investment for LP, thus profit may be easier indeed.
Wotan29 wrote:Have you ever watched a Rocco Siffredi Intimate Castings scene?
Dudemeister wrote:Pretty strange to call this scene "vanilla".
Ok, no DAP, I get it, but at least that's not my definition.
Anyway, scene is great, the guys go hard on her, I love her glasses, she drinks A LOT of piss, and finally she's not taking her heels off. What's not to like?
greenfunk727 wrote:I love Sara Bell but haven’t bought a scene of hers for awhile. For my tastes her scenes have become a bit tame. Every time a new scene of hers drops I’m ready to buy but then realise it’s a bit Vanilla. I want her to shoot scenes like Cindy Shine, a bit more anal focused.
Sara is still gorgeous though.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:greenfunk727 wrote:I love Sara Bell but haven’t bought a scene of hers for awhile. For my tastes her scenes have become a bit tame. Every time a new scene of hers drops I’m ready to buy but then realise it’s a bit Vanilla. I want her to shoot scenes like Cindy Shine, a bit more anal focused.
Sara is still gorgeous though.
Thanks for this explanation, I was wondering why I don't buy Cindy Shine scenes anymore! I guess I didn't give it much thought. I feel the exact opposite as you do. Cindy was one of my favorite models and her beautiful asshole of course but I had no motivation to purchase her recent scenes. I thought it was the choice of male stars but your explanation turned on the light bulb as her last 4 or 5 scenes have all been 0% Pussy so I have not purchased any of them. My fetishes go in order of DP, TP, Anal, Pussy, DV, DA and TA. I'm just not a fan of 0% Pussy scenes probably accounting for less than 10% of my purchases.
"To each its own" but it figures that dap-addict living in his jaded world would call DP and this specific scene by the beautiful and extremely talented Sara Bell vanilla
grey00owl wrote:Well, as you say, to each his own, but I can't understand as some content can prevents you to enjoy a model you like and performs well. Sara and Cindy are two gorgeous girls and ultra hot and nasty performers: I'm glad to buy every new scene.
NotACuck wrote:Bahaha at calling this scene "vanilla". 0% pussy is vanilla and homo. It's not even sex. It's buggery. A virgin that does a 0% pussy scene is still a virgin.
The whole point of interracial porn is to see the fresh white wombs and pussies of fresh white sluts get absolutely sullied and destroyed by black cocks.
And the older and uglier and blacker the black man, the better. So this scene absolutely has it all. Michael Chapman is hideous. The other guy isn't much better. And they absolutely destroy this hot young white slut and make her drink gallons of their piss and all their cum.
EVERY hot young white whore on LP should be fed to these hideous, merciless BBCs in such a fashion. It should be a contractual obligation.
Michael Chapman and Carloz Valdez should have their own series: "Hideous old black men destroy, piss all over and inseminate fresh white sluts." 100% vaginal creampie every time, followed by collecting the cum in a glass, mixing it with piss, and drinking it all.
dpconnoisseur1 wrote:It drives me insane that there are circle jerks in porn with men standing around waiting for their turn. Why form a line so that one after another a male gets a chance to fuck the same whole (whether ass, pussy or mouth) when the model has her ass, pussy, mouth and hands available to be stroked ? It drives me insane, why limit yourself
"To each its own", one thing we know is that there are multiple specific fantasies on this forum and none are more important than the other in theory only what LP believe they can effectively monetize