grey00owl wrote:Yes to hair pulling: especially in doggy it's so nice to see the guy grabbing and pulling the girl's hair forcing her head backwards and arching her back. Yes to nipples pulling/pinching/twisting/slapping, pussy pinching and slapping. I would add choking and face and mouth spitting for a complete manhandle program.
magizi87 wrote:I also love spitting. I didn't want to make my post even longer to include all the stuff I like.
Men spitting into the girl anus or her mouth and face, so hot, heh.
Also girls spitting into the cocks for extra lubrication, and girls spitting back to the men faces.
All good stuff.
Other examples, men fingering her pussy, anus or mouth, ass to pussy, ass to mouth,
face slapping, ass spanking, choking girls with cock... etc
One of my favorite Luis' movies is with Evelina Darling, SZ1983, pff! that movie was made for me,
you can constantly hear her gasping for air due to all the oral sex, that was probably a bit much for, heh!
I hate when girls do everything seemingly without any effort, cruising mode enabled, you know.
If you look at her face, that day was rough, in a sexy way, lovely Evelina handled it gracefully IMO.
You can even hear Luis saying stuff to slow down the guys, and I wish he didn't lol.
I love seeing beautiful women "reacting" to overwhelming, testosterone driven, undivided attention.
I hugely disappointed with the current flavor of the 1,2,3, 4, then gangbang or whatever is called.
Those movies just don't seem to ever climax IMO, the execution doesn't lead to women faces looking excited somehow, lol.
ALSO, I think the last 3 were all filmed with, not slim ladies, lol
These movies, kinda come months apart, I'm not hating on the curvy ladies.
I hope Cindy Shine does another one, this time without DAP, and make it a good movie this time? lol
hjohjole wrote:Still way to much DP and pussy penetration in way to many Gonzo studio scenes.
magizi87 wrote:hjohjole wrote:Still way to much DP and pussy penetration in way to many Gonzo studio scenes.
Would you still dislike vaginal porn if it were like this more often?
If you slow down this video, there are parts, were Lola is taking Charlie Mac huge cock, balls deep in her pussy.
and by the look on her face, she can barely do it, (hehe).
And combining anal and vaginal sex, back a forth, is awesome
ass to pussy, anal gape visible while the pussy is frantically stimulated,
I mean, women have vaginas for a reason.
That part where she moves her arm, like that, so sexy, you can see her trying to release the muscle tension.
the facial expression on her face, everything else, is just very fun to watch is what I'm trying to say.
My pledge on this thread is that Gonzo see's past the niches, the tags, the "ingredients"
and focus on delivering amazing experiences, like they used to do pretty much effortlessly
when they had some of the best male talent in one place.
magizi87 wrote:Would you still dislike vaginal porn if it were like this more often?
magizi87 wrote:
I arrived at the following conclusion,
the reason they sell the movies with poor color representation
is their anti piracy technology
because as I increased the saturation to make it look more alive,
I noticed the yellow dots, a helluva lot more.
I'm mind blown that even the trailers have the DOTS, lol
magizi87 wrote:UPDATE.
I still haven't buy anything, but some of the new trailers are changing my mind about LP in a positive direction.
Some quick feedback.
I noticed this:
WATERMARK ISSUES
SOMETIMES, The action is captured from the left side of the model.
historically, the sex is captured from the other side.
The left side is problematic because the editor, ALWAYS, places the watermark in the same position,
no matter what. You know, this has many solutions that allow the director to capture the action
however he thinks is best, if the editor is allowed to move the watermark, to other places of the screen,
where it doesn't block, the ass of the girl, or her face in different positions, etc.
But if XXX doesn't allow this freedom because WHATEVER, then go back to always capture video from the right side.
Maybe you can setup your camera mini screen, to always show you, LUIS, where the watermark will appear,
and therefore you can position the camera at a angle where the watermark is not blocking the view
of the things we care about. Or you can just place a sticker on the camera mini screen, roughly where the watermark
will be, for the same purpose.
This watermark is really annoying, lol.
There is only one other pornsite with an even worse watermark than yours.
Your "dear" competitor, he who shall not be named, WOODMAN.
Just know that your watermark is ALMOST on the same level of bad, as his. lol
(Seriously).
MANHANDLE stuff:
I love this stuff, and I know there are people who hate it. Ok?
So, when it's a thing, that happens in the movie, I know you are
thinking about a perhaps, minority of your fanbase.
So, I appreciate that it's there, but is kinda foamed in, is just not good enough.
I want to see the guys pull her arms, towards them, at the same time
the men are pushing their hip towards her, to penetrate with more force.
In other words, I want to see the guys use the model's body, as added leverage,
to fuck her harder. Not really faster, just harder.
Faster means they pull out and push in, with more frequency.
but often, when they fuck faster, the men sacrifice form and don't complete the full motion.
So it becomes jerky and lame. FASTER doesn't create better movies IMO.
BDSM accessories:
You are using them wrong, lol.
In my opinion, that is, hehe.
I hate when porn uses BDSM stuff with the clear result of making the sex harder to do.
FOR EXAMPLE:
the cage, is just making the action slower, more lame, and harder to do, for both of them,
their dicks are so far away from her face, that the best she can do is suck the tips.
the best we can expect is tip-fucking.
THAT'S JUST WRONG.
(I'm not yelling, i love you guys, kinda of)
UGH!
the smart way to use BDSM stuff, is to build suspense, erotism and male domination.
but never at the expense of making the flow of sex more difficult.
But please keep practicing, Don't take this as discouragement.
On the contrary.
two examples of BDSM done right,
makes sex easier, puts the model in a pleasant looking position, etc:
(and it's easy to do)
You just need a sofa, you already have, and a bit of rope.
Also important, she has her wrist tied to a belt she is wearing
to lock up her arms at 90 degrees. In the chicken wing position, looks real sweet.
and forces her to suck dick without hands, ufff, extra sexy
also, the guy behind her can choose to mount her up and ride her,
which is better looking IMO and also harder.
This one would be a real treat to look at if the model
has a narrow waist and flexibility.
Another thing about BDSM is that is hotter if it looks improvised IMO.
It's more erotic if it looks like you got crafty and used stuff you already had,
instead of buying some contraption.
The loaded barbell is just extra kinky because you know she won't go anywhere.
Stuff that all movies need.
In particular rough sex movies because those are the ones I want to buy, lol.
I'm not looking forward to seeing girls getting their hair pulled so hard it REALLY hurts,
find a middle ground where it doesn't look fake, but is not so brut'ish is not sexy.
por favor.
stevehappy339 wrote:who's the girl?
magizi87 wrote:And combining anal and vaginal sex, back a forth, is awesome
ass to pussy, anal gape visible while the pussy is frantically stimulated,
I mean, women have vaginas for a reason.
Wotan29 wrote:magizi87 wrote:And combining anal and vaginal sex, back a forth, is awesome
ass to pussy, anal gape visible while the pussy is frantically stimulated,
I mean, women have vaginas for a reason.
Amen.
magizi87 wrote:Dude^,
Everybody knows the absolute WORSE part of Gonzo movies is when the high heels come off.
blanco9211 wrote:dont talk behaf everybody, everybody has own opinion , there are a lot of pepole who like barefeet and seeing the model being completly naked from head to toe.
dap-addict wrote:Blanco, in a poll I conducted almost 5 years ago, only 20% of LP users preferred barefoot over hells and/or stockings. For these customers enough scenes are getting produced.
Maybe percentage changed a bit since, but sure not significantly.
This poll: https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=7554&p=23911#p23911
blanco9211 wrote:what the hell with heels on the entire scene lately????? every scene ethier lingire or stockings or heels on the entire scene and if by a small chance you make the girl taking them off it happens in the last part of the scene, why is that what is your problem with showing the girl bare feet the entire scene you done it before and never affected the scene!!!!! ,i dont understand this why its Priority to do that in every scene its part of the girl body not something to hide to the last part of the scene, during the whole week if you lucky you get 1 gonzo scene with the girl being completly naked from head to toe, the whole freakin week for example and in the light of taylee wood scene today you know when the last time we had taylee scene where she being completly naked from head to toe almost the entire scene? in may from 6 month ago ,and there are alot of example like that , is thats normal??????
can somebody tell us what the problem here ? because i dont think the model has problem with such thing
P.S shame, i like omar work in The last time he take over the studio from march to august he had his own style espacily with shoting a lot of scenes with the girl being completly naked from head to toe and the bare feet is visible i hope you return to your style very sonn you dont have to do what other doing
Dylan.122 wrote:blanco9211 wrote:what the hell with heels on the entire scene lately????? every scene ethier lingire or stockings or heels on the entire scene and if by a small chance you make the girl taking them off it happens in the last part of the scene, why is that what is your problem with showing the girl bare feet the entire scene you done it before and never affected the scene!!!!! ,i dont understand this why its Priority to do that in every scene its part of the girl body not something to hide to the last part of the scene, during the whole week if you lucky you get 1 gonzo scene with the girl being completly naked from head to toe, the whole freakin week for example and in the light of taylee wood scene today you know when the last time we had taylee scene where she being completly naked from head to toe almost the entire scene? in may from 6 month ago ,and there are alot of example like that , is thats normal??????
can somebody tell us what the problem here ? because i dont think the model has problem with such thing
P.S shame, i like omar work in The last time he take over the studio from march to august he had his own style espacily with shoting a lot of scenes with the girl being completly naked from head to toe and the bare feet is visible i hope you return to your style very sonn you dont have to do what other doing
No, I prefer when the girl has beautiful shoes and very warm outfit, it's much more attractive and much more beautiful
Gonzo continue with beautiful shoes throughout the scene
If you don't like, you can go elsewhere !
grey00owl wrote:I totally disagree about fashion: GONZO is by far the best studio as far as for style. First, to reply directly to the accusation of dressing the models like pseudo teens from a Max Hardcore movie: quite the opposite I find nice to see a very young model in a schoolgirl outfit instead of a whore's one. More in general I really like how carefully at that studio they choose the outfits, according to the model's age, physical type and personality.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests