Moderator: dan
davebowman wrote:Trailer for the new Marley Brinx/Kyaa Chimera scene looks pretty incredible in terms of anal action, but I'm slightly scared off by the foot-fetish stuff (it's one of the few things I find a real turn-off), so crossing fingers for a few non-foot focused scenes at some point (or at least heels rather than bare feet).
Jocke wrote:What will be your unique sales proposition? How will your scenes be different and stand out in the crowded porn world? Do you plan on a theme or a signature?
CanadianCouple wrote:Jocke wrote:What will be your unique sales proposition? How will your scenes be different and stand out in the crowded porn world? Do you plan on a theme or a signature?
he interacts with porn buyers and fans..... that is unique to say the least. Gets my attention to want to support his work.
davebowman wrote:Trailer for the new Marley Brinx/Kyaa Chimera scene looks pretty incredible in terms of anal action, but I'm slightly scared off by the foot-fetish stuff (it's one of the few things I find a real turn-off), so crossing fingers for a few non-foot focused scenes at some point (or at least heels rather than bare feet).
YumYum74 wrote:Held off buying cause I’m not into the feet fetish at all unfortunately.
CanadianCouple wrote:Jocke wrote:What will be your unique sales proposition? How will your scenes be different and stand out in the crowded porn world? Do you plan on a theme or a signature?
he interacts with porn buyers and fans..... that is unique to say the least. Gets my attention to want to support his work.
Jocke wrote:I bought the scene because in the trailer Charlie Mac licked Marley's gape. I'll watch it tomorrow.
Jocke wrote:CanadianCouple wrote:Jocke wrote:What will be your unique sales proposition? How will your scenes be different and stand out in the crowded porn world? Do you plan on a theme or a signature?
he interacts with porn buyers and fans..... that is unique to say the least. Gets my attention to want to support his work.
Yes, that is why I am interacting, but it is hard to have a view on the strategy if it is just "what the director likes".
I support the idea that directors need to feel passionate about their work. I don't think you can shoot great porn unless you are a pervert who enjoys ogling naked women.
Anal sex is a must today but I don't think it is enough. There has to be some new angle to it. There are a few themes in porn that I like but which could be improved upon.
1. Cum swallowing fetish.
We all like to see a big cock pumping several shots into the mouths of willing girls (like AllInternal used to do), however most cumshots are failures in my opinion. They are either fake, too small, misses the target or the girl dodges. I want see girls who eagerly goes for the cum, do the jerking (not the guy) slurps every bit of cum, swallow eagerly and goes back to clean the cock. All while she talks dirty (but realistic).
I also like the idea of many amateur guys getting a chance to a blowbang but most are pathetic. GGG is nasty enough but video quality is lousy. Premium Bukkake for sure provide enough semen but in an uninspiring way with an inactive girl and lousy photo. There are some great Gloryhole scenes with the main benefit that the girl has to do the job but I find the wall silly. It is quite inspiring though when the girls are true amateurs and the before/after interview is realistic and not just the standard stupid questions. This is a genre ripe for disruption.
2. Better photo angle anal sex.
I want close ups but where you can see the girls face too. I want anal sex but I appreciate a pussy spread too. I want bar stool sex, especially when guys turn the chairs and fuck in rapid progression. I like standing doggy like in First Anal Quest, filmed from below. I like when the girl do all the work in riding position especially if she is standing. I want gaping for longer time. I want more anal fingering. I want girls to swerwe their booties when riding anal. I want guys to grab their dick and swirl around in the girls butt. I want fun objects in the girls butts (I just watched Adriana shitting five yellow plastic ducks!)
3. Clothes
I like seeing a girl pull down her jeans, bend over and spread her cheeks to get a dick in her ass. It is much nastier than fully naked, especially if public or outdoors. I also like girls hanging over the counter talking while being butt fucked as if nothing.
grey00owl wrote:But you are absolutely right: the cumshot is a highlight in a porn scene and has to be shot with the maximum care. It's not acceptable to see a guy missing the target and wasting the cum. I've just seen the latest footage with Lagoona Blaze where Mr Anderson good load gets almost completely wasted: it's really very annoying.
Mister Ananas wrote:New scene is coming this week. I'll post previews closer to the release date.
magizi87 wrote:I want to see porn filmed with a high speed camera.
I would love to see a 240 frames per second movie, just to see how it is.
I usually play my favorite Gonzo movies at 25 to 50% play speed.
Well the strip-tease and dildo usually at normal speed.
Full body tease, I do like to go slow too tho. But the sex,
when the guys are "really" fucking, I like to play the movie at those slow speeds.
In fact most of my gifs, are in slow motion.
Also, if the actors could abstain from sex or masturbation for 3 or 4 days straight,
for an awesome cumshot/facial splash,
filmed with a high speed camera could be great IMO.
I know high speed cameras are expensive, but in America, where pineapples is located,
you can rent those cameras, you don't have to buy them to give them a try.
There are very lucrative youtube channels,
that are purely based upon showing stuff in slow motion,
like watching popcorn do the "pop" part and shit,
High speed cameras are AMAZING, please try.
240 frames per second inst that high tech anyway.
There are cameras in the 15,000 frames per second and higher, lol.
magizi87 wrote:The beauty of frames per second is that the user can choose to play the video at they speed they most enjoy the video.
If they don't want to watch the porn movie in slow motion, you don't have to force them.
A second has 1000 miliseconds. (MS for short)
Gonzo movies are filmed with 50 frames per second.
That means that a new image (frame) is displayed every 20 ms.
At that play speed, the video looks at natural speed.
If per say you were to increase the frames per second to 240 fps.
Each new frame will play at 4 ms instead of every 20 ms.
And at normal speed, you will not notice much of a difference.
But if you slow down the video play speed to like 80 or 100 ms per each frame, at your leisure,
using the video player, now the video looks in slow motion.
For example, a Gonzo movie with 50 fps, played at 1/5th the speed,
each one second of action is stretched to 5 seconds of playtime, so you can see
things more clearly and much more detail that you could otherwise see.
Cameras pick up so much more information that what our eyes and brain can do in real time.
For this reason it's quite fascinating to discover all this stuff that we cannot see with the naked eye.
You can slow down any video,
but the lower the frames per second the movie was recorded,
the choppier it looks when played in slow motion
Whereas with high FPS, it looks smoother and clearer.
The thing that high speed cameras have, over regular cameras, is that each frame still looks "in focus"
whereas cheaper cameras that record at high FPS, have a lot of motion blur when you look at each frame.
Mister Ananas wrote:New scene is coming this week. I'll post previews closer to the release date.
Mister Ananas wrote:New scene is coming this week. I'll post previews closer to the release date.
grey00owl wrote:Any news? Mr Ananas, LP...?
CanadianCouple wrote:grey00owl wrote:Any news? Mr Ananas, LP...?
seems this test kitchen didnt last long
grey00owl wrote:CanadianCouple wrote:grey00owl wrote:Any news? Mr Ananas, LP...?
seems this test kitchen didnt last long
They actually sold well... Don't understand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests