More MILFs?

[Pineapples Studio]

I never said you weren't allowed to do that, but I'm not required to like it.

Woe is you, realtip. Why won't the world just leave you alone and let you watch your hurtcore "rape fantasy" porn in peace?

[realtip]

I never said you weren't allowed to do that, but I'm not required to like it.

When did I ever say that you had to like it or agree with it? I really don't give a fuck either way. As I said before, your opinion is worthless. If you don't like it, then just shut the fuck up about it. Otherwise, don't complain when your hypocrisy and fatuity are placed on full display.

[Pineapples Studio]

So my opinion is worthless, but yours is not... and why is that exactly? Our opinions are of equal worth.

At any rate, you clearly do give a fuck either way since you're still prattling on about this.

[Tastes Like Ass]

As usual, you construct straw man arguments and ignore the important parts of my post, like this:

...if they start catering to every fetish that anyone suggests, they'll wind up like Evil Angel, where about 90% of the scenes that they release are weird niche material that only appeals to a very small group of people.

That's why I keep talking about the importance of LP maintaining its formula. Otherwise, it'll end up like Evil Angel. Maybe you think that's a good thing. Maybe you would like to see LP start shooting femdom scenes, cuckold scenes, BBW scenes, scenes with guys getting fucked in the ass with strapons, scenes that are nothing but dry humping for the entire scene, scenes with huge trannies fucking tiny gay guys dressed like butterflies, and all the other bizarre shit that Evil Angel churns out literally on a daily basis. If so, I suggest you go there. It's a hell of a lot cheaper than LP, and if it wasn't, I would have cancelled my Evil Angel membership a long time ago.

To the contrary, it is about a certain type of girl. How else do you explain all the girls on here looking almost the same with no variety among appearance? Also, go take a look at the boobjob thread and see how many people based their opposition to girls with boobjobs on the claim that fake tits don't belong on LP. Apparently, many of the guys here feel that only scrawny pale white girls with small tits should be shot for LP, and that girls with fake tits do not fit in with the "LP formula," which is no different from your claim that rough sex doesn't fit in with the "LP formula."

I don't care what people claim. The fact is that LP (or, more accurately, Sineplex/Sinsational/Sinterracial/Evilutionplex/LP) has, from the start, and continuing until now, shot a wide variety of models. But the sex has always been basically the same. They have made some minor changes along the way, but nothing as drastic as you are advocating.

So your fantasies are better than other peoples' fantasies? I didn't know that there was a fantasy competition. I don't particularly care what you or other people fantasize about. It's not my concern. Likewise, I have no idea why you're so concerned about what I fantasize about. So tell me, do you and evil-pineapples have matching thought police uniforms?

"Thought police"? There you go again, with another absurd straw man. I guess if you can't refute my actual arguments, at least you can fantasize about arguments that you wish I would make, so you could refute them.

What the fuck is wrong with you where you keep thinking that LP has to set restrictions upon what it can shoot and can't shoot? What is this obsession you have with saying that LP should be able to shoot one thing, but not the other?

For the exact reason I explained above. A smart business understands that the way you succeed is to find something that you do well, and work on doing that one thing as well as you possibly can, rather than trying to do everything and trying to please everybody. If they don't limit the type of content they produce, they will, at best, become a jack of all trades and master of none (like, say, 21Sextury), and at worst, they will turn into Evil Angel, where most of the stuff they produce will only appeal to a tiny fraction of their audience. That might work with a subscription-based business model, where people can pay one low price to download the stuff they like and ignore the copious amounts of garbage, but with LP's ticket-based model, it's a sure recipe for bankruptcy.

The real question is why you (and a few other people) keep coming here trying to change the type of content that they produce. I don't go to Kink and start telling them to get rid of all the bondage, S&M, and other fetish stuff. Nor do I go to Naughty America and tell them to start shooting all-anal gangbangs full of DPs. If you don't like the content that LP produces, why did you come here in the first place? And more importantly, why don't you leave and go find somewhere that does make the kind of stuff you like? Or at least, go find somewhere else to play your broken record.

[realtip]

So my opinion is worthless, but yours is not... and why is that exactly? Our opinions are of equal worth.

You've proven yourself to be a hypocrite and an idiot. Once you do that, nothing you say has any value as far as I'm concerned. I may reply to you out of courtesy or simply to correct how wrong you are, but don't mistake that as actually giving a fuck.

Maybe you would like to see LP start shooting femdom scenes, cuckold scenes, BBW scenes, scenes with guys getting fucked in the ass with strapons, scenes that are nothing but dry humping for the entire scene, scenes with huge trannies fucking tiny gay guys dressed like butterflies, and all the other bizarre shit that Evil Angel churns out literally on a daily basis.

No, I don't want to see any of those things. But if LP were to decide to start shooting them, I could always choose to avoid watching them.

It's a hell of a lot cheaper than LP, and if it wasn't, I would have cancelled my Evil Angel membership a long time ago.

So you constantly complain about the stuff Evil Angel produces, yet you still have a subscription there? Meanwhile, you adamantly oppose any new idea that anyone suggests for LP, even if it's nowhere near as bizarre as the stuff that Evil Angel produces, for which you still pay a membership. Do you not see how ironic this is?

I don't care what people claim. The fact is that LP (or, more accurately, Sineplex/Sinsational/Sinterracial/Evilutionplex/LP) has, from the start, and continuing until now, shot a wide variety of models. But the sex has always been basically the same. They have made some minor changes along the way, but nothing as drastic as you are advocating.

So everything must always stay the same? Nothing must ever change? You must be one boring person. You sound like the type of person who eats the same meal for breakfast, lunch, and dinner everyday, or who wears the same outfit everyday because you don't want to break your "formula."

Change is not the worst thing in the world, and I am not advocating anything "drastic." I am advocating that LP continue to shoot the exact same type of sex it already shoots, just with the added elements of rough sex or dominant/submissive scenarios. You're here on a porn site that shows girls shooting whipped cream out of their asses and getting pissed on by groups of guys, yet you have the nerve to call the suggestion of rough sex and rape role-play "drastic." Wow! If you don't see how ridiculously ironic that is, then you really are a lost cause.

I guess if you can't refute my actual arguments, at least you can fantasize about arguments that you wish I would make, so you could refute them.

I have refuted your arguments. I can't help you still being in denial.

That might work with a subscription-based business model, where people can pay one low price to download the stuff they like and ignore the copious amounts of garbage, but with LP's ticket-based model, it's a sure recipe for bankruptcy.

How do you know this if they haven't tried it? What's so wrong with LP shooting some rough sex scenes and seeing how well they sell? If they sell poorly and no one buys them, then they simply stop producing them. If they are popular and people buy them, then they keep producing them. That's what a smart business does. A smart business doesn't resist doing anything different that may prove profitable just for the sake of following some supposed "formula."

The real question is why you (and a few other people) keep coming here trying to change the type of content that they produce. I don't go to Kink and start telling them to get rid of all the bondage, S&M, and other fetish stuff. Nor do I go to Naughty America and tell them to start shooting all-anal gangbangs full of DPs. If you don't like the content that LP produces, why did you come here in the first place? And more importantly, why don't you leave and go find somewhere that does make the kind of stuff you like?

I'm not trying to change anything. For the most part, I like what LP produces. Otherwise, you're right that I wouldn't be here paying my money to buy their scenes. But just because I like what they already produce doesn't mean that I'm opposed to them doing anything different that I may also like. Unlike you, I'm not resistant to change, or believe it to be a terrible thing. I like what LP produces now, but I disagree with you that it has to operate in some static bubble and never do anything new. If LP followed your advice, there's a whole lot of stuff they wouldn't be shooting now just because they didn't used to shoot it before. Change can be a positive thing, despite your obstinance in realizing that.

Or at least, go find somewhere else to play your broken record.

Coming from someone who keeps talking about a "LP formula" in every post you make, you really shouldn't be calling anyone else a broken record until you come up with some new material yourself.

[Pineapples Studio]

I still don't see how I'm a hypocrite. I respect your right to like and watch the things you want to like and watch, and to come on this forum and ask for them, but I don't have to agree with it, like it, help you find it, or support you in your quest to get LP to make it in any way whatsoever.

But there is no hypocrisy. Just because I disagree with you, that doesn't make me a hypocrite. I get the sense that you're equating me with an anti-porn activist somehow, but the difference is that I'm trying to ban anything. I'm simply requesting that a particular company refrain from producing a certain type of porn. That is not at all the same thing as trying to get it banned, and the fact that you would equate those concepts in your twisted mind and try to spin the situation so that it's all about YOU and YOUR opinions being unfairly targeted speaks volumes about your sad ego. This is an open discussion forum. People will disagree with you. People are allowed to disagree with you. If enough people disagree with you, maybe things won't go your way. That's life. Get over it.

If you want to watch "rape fantasy," go somewhere else. It's not something that enough of us want here for it to be worthwhile. I am so, so dreadfully sorry that the opinions of your peers don't align with your own on this subject, but I am sure you'll find a way to cope.

I am not calling for a ban on your precious "rape fantasy," nor am I (or TLA, for that matter) saying that LP should never change or explore new ideas. We're just saying that we don't like the idea you came up with. We don't want to see that shit here.

[realtip]

I still don't see how I'm a hypocrite. I respect your right to like and watch the things you want to like and watch, and to come on this forum and ask for them, but I don't have to agree with it, like it, help you find it, or support you in your quest to get LP to make it in any way whatsoever.

Again, who the hell ever asked you to do any of that? I certainly never did because I don't give a fuck about whether you approve or not.

But there is no hypocrisy. Just because I disagree with you, that doesn't make me a hypocrite.

No, disagreeing with me doesn't make you a hypocrite. Making stupid judgements and assumptions about other people based on the type of porn that they like when you're here watching porn yourself is what makes you a hypocrite.

I get the sense that you're equating me with an anti-porn activist somehow, but the difference is that I'm trying to ban anything. I'm simply requesting that a particular company refrain from producing a certain type of porn. That is not at all the same thing as trying to get it banned, and the fact that you would equate those concepts in your twisted mind and try to spin the situation so that it's all about YOU and YOUR opinions being unfairly targeted speaks volumes about your sad ego.

When did I ever say that I felt unfairly targeted? I've already said numerous times that I don't care enough about your opinion for it to matter to me. The fact that you think anyone is losing sleep about whether or not you approve of their taste in porn says a lot about YOUR sad ego. You're obviously craving some needed attention.

This is an open discussion forum. People will disagree with you. People are allowed to disagree with you. If enough people disagree with you, maybe things won't go your way. That's life. Get over it.

Since you seem to have hard time getting the message, let me say it loud and clear once more: I DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHETHER OR NOT YOU AGREE WITH ME. I know you're a little slow, but I really hope you caught it that time.

If you want to watch "rape fantasy," go somewhere else. It's not something that enough of us want here for it to be worthwhile. I am so, so dreadfully sorry that the opinions of your peers don't align with your own on this subject, but I am sure you'll find a way to cope.

How ironic it is that you're always the main one going around accusing other people of trying to speak on behalf of the majority when here you are doing just that right now. Don't project your personal views onto everyone else. You have no idea what my "peers" think, neither can you speak with any knowledge or authority about what "enough of us here" want. As you often love to tell other people, speak only for yourself and not everyone else. This is yet further proof of how hypocritical and closed-minded you are.

I am not calling for a ban on your precious "rape fantasy," nor am I (or TLA, for that matter) saying that LP should never change or explore new ideas. We're just saying that we don't like the idea you came up with. We don't want to see that shit here.

Who gives a fuck what you want to see? As you said yourself, this is an open discussion forum and people are allowed to disagree. Hence, I disagree with you. If you don't want to see the same stuff I would like to see, then that's fine. No one ever said you had to. Still, I have just as much of right to request it as you have to oppose it. And again, two people don't speak for the majority. So stop pretending that you do.

[alongwaysouth]

Meanwhile, back on topic, yeah, why not more MILFs?

I still wanna see Simony do her 1st DAP at LP. A 4 or 5 on 1, cocks of all colours and all finishing in her ass.

Other MILFS? Or maybe just veterans? Lucy Lee would be a good start. I'd even be interested to see how Julie Silver fucks these days. Claudia Rossi seems to have worked her way beyond the caper (smart lady, by all reports), so probably a real long shot.

If anyone knows where Angel Dark is these days, she'd be great to have back. My guess is she's probably beefed up a bit, but she did love ATP (even said so to camera once). Took ACP's, too (just not often enough).

Who else? Oh, yeah, the great Moni from back in the Sineplex days. She's done a bit of bondage stuff, too, and man doesn't she do it well. Just a magnificent face and smile. Cherry Jul? Great ass fuck, Cherry. Lis - what a gape. Wendy/Pusia (her scene with Moni was a classic).

Heaps more, obviously.

Is Abelinda/Sarah a MILF yet? The complete anal queen, that girl.

[tgcfc26]

Bring back Angela Winter, that little harlot must be a mother by now

[USfans_are_retards]

not really

http://www.kernerstrasse4.de/angela-winter-jetzt-da

[tgcfc26]

^Holy shit, she's still in the sex industry and only 26 ? I was joking about bringing her back because I thought it was unrealistic, I now want to see her here. This is probably a long shot but is there any chance this could happen, xxx ? One of the best anal performers of all time imo.

[realtip]

I still wanna see Simony do her 1st DAP at LP. A 4 or 5 on 1, cocks of all colours and all finishing in her ass.

Other MILFS? Or maybe just veterans? Lucy Lee would be a good start. I'd even be interested to see how Julie Silver fucks these days. Claudia Rossi seems to have worked her way beyond the caper (smart lady, by all reports), so probably a real long shot.

If anyone knows where Angel Dark is these days, she'd be great to have back. My guess is she's probably beefed up a bit, but she did love ATP (even said so to camera once). Took ACP's, too (just not often enough).

Who else? Oh, yeah, the great Moni from back in the Sineplex days. She's done a bit of bondage stuff, too, and man doesn't she do it well. Just a magnificent face and smile. Cherry Jul? Great ass fuck, Cherry. Lis - what a gape. Wendy/Pusia (her scene with Moni was a classic).

Heaps more, obviously.

Is Abelinda/Sarah a MILF yet? The complete anal queen, that girl.

You are aware that just about everybody you listed there hasn't been active in years, right? I don't think Julie Silver, for example, has been seen performing in like 10 years. None of them probably even look the same now as they did when they were performing as they have all most likely aged since they left. With all the hot girls that are in porn right now, I have no idea why some people insist on living in the past.

[Tastes Like Ass]

No, I don't want to see any of those things. But if LP were to decide to start shooting them, I could always choose to avoid watching them.

You miss the point (again). LP only puts out 1 scene per day. If they start shooting all that other shit, we'll be lucky to get 3 good scenes a month. You think I'm going to pay $80 for a 3-month membership that gets me 10 good scenes?

So you constantly complain about the stuff Evil Angel produces, yet you still have a subscription there? Meanwhile, you adamantly oppose any new idea that anyone suggests for LP, even if it's nowhere near as bizarre as the stuff that Evil Angel produces, for which you still pay a membership. Do you not see how ironic this is?

You truly have the worst reading comprehension of anyone I've ever encountered. The sentence that you quoted right above that was: It's a hell of a lot cheaper than LP, and if it wasn't, I would have cancelled my Evil Angel membership a long time ago. Go back and read that over and over again until it starts to sink in.

So everything must always stay the same? Nothing must ever change? You must be one boring person. You sound like the type of person who eats the same meal for breakfast, lunch, and dinner everyday, or who wears the same outfit everyday because you don't want to break your "formula."

Yet another straw man. I never said nothing could change. Of course they should make minor changes (different girls, different outfits, different positions, etc.), but what they should not do is abandon the basic formula that they have always employed, and whether you want to admit it or not, a big part of that formula is the girls willingly submitting to various kinds of nasty, perverted sex.

I'm not trying to change anything. For the most part, I like what LP produces. Otherwise, you're right that I wouldn't be here paying my money to buy their scenes. But just because I like what they already produce doesn't mean that I'm opposed to them doing anything different that I may also like. Unlike you, I'm not resistant to change, or believe it to be a terrible thing. I like what LP produces now, but I disagree with you that it has to operate in some static bubble and never do anything new. If LP followed your advice, there's a whole lot of stuff they wouldn't be shooting now just because they didn't used to shoot it before. Change can be a positive thing, despite your obstinance in realizing that.

If you like the stuff that they produce, then why can't you just be happy with that, and go somewhere else to get your "rape fantasy" crap? There's no law that says that you are only allowed to get porn from one site. I have memberships at several sites right now, and I have had memberships at countless other ones over the years. Unlike you, I don't expect one site to provide every possible different type of porn that I might want to watch. That's an unrealistic expectation.

You remind me of a guy who goes to a steakhouse, and then complains because they don't serve pizza. When you want pizza, go to a pizza place. When you want steak, go to a steakhouse. But don't expect to find one restaurant that serves every type of food you could ever desire, because no restaurant would be stupid enough to try to do that, and if they did, they'd go out of business in a hurry.

[gannicus]

Good idea , sandra romain , kathy anderson , stacy silver and more

[realtip]

You miss the point (again). LP only puts out 1 scene per day. If they start shooting all that other shit, we'll be lucky to get 3 good scenes a month. You think I'm going to pay $80 for a 3-month membership that gets me 10 good scenes?

No Dude, you're the one missing the point. You're the one who keeps bringing up all these other bizzarre fetishes that have nothing to do with anything. You're the one who keeps calling a perfectly reasonable and potentially popular suggestion a "drastic change" to your imaginary "formula." Not everyone likes cream or piss either. But LP seems to be doing just fine even though not everyone likes those things. My suggestion, which has also been suggested by others, is simply another idea to further appeal to LP audiences. Just because YOU don't like it doesn't mean others won't.

You truly have the worst reading comprehension of anyone I've ever encountered. The sentence that you quoted right above that was: It's a hell of a lot cheaper than LP, and if it wasn't, I would have cancelled my Evil Angel membership a long time ago. Go back and read that over and over again until it starts to sink in.

Even if that were true, my reading comprehension couldn't possibly be anywhere near as bad as your arithmetic skills. "3 good scenes a month?" How the fuck did you pull that number out of your ass?

Yet another straw man. I never said nothing could change. Of course they should make minor changes (different girls, different outfits, different positions, etc.), but what they should not do is abandon the basic formula that they have always employed, and whether you want to admit it or not, a big part of that formula is the girls willingly submitting to various kinds of nasty, perverted sex.

Your entire argument is made of straw and makes absolutely no sense. Again, no one ever said anything about LP "adandoning" anything. LP is now releasing scenes with condoms. Does that mean that it's "abandoning" its non-condom "formula?" LP now releases 0% pussy scenes. Does that mean that it's "abandoning" its DP/ATP "formula?" Of course not. It just simply means that the site is providing more variety while still shooting the same type of sex that the site is known for. Hence, adding rough sex scenes for those of us who like that content doesn't mean that they'd be "abandoning" anything. No one needs to resort to straw men when your statements are already weak.

You remind me of a guy who goes to a steakhouse, and then complains because they don't serve pizza. When you want pizza, go to a pizza place. When you want steak, go to a steakhouse. But don't expect to find one restaurant that serves every type of food you could ever desire, because no restaurant would be stupid enough to try to do that, and if they did, they'd go out of business in a hurry.

You must not go out to eat a lot, do you? The more appropriate comparison would be applicable to you. You're like the guy who guys into a steakhouse and raises a fuss that the steakhouse should only serve sirloin and not porterhouse just because it didn't serve porterhouse before, and then goes about comparing porterhouse to every other type of food that the steakhouse doesn't serve. Even though it's almost all the same and comes from the same animal, you insist that adding something new to the menu would be a "drastic change" just because you happen not to like it.

I never asked LP to produce everything, neither would I expect it to. I'm suggesting that it continue to produce what it already produces, just rougher and more aggressive. I'm not even saying that every scene needs to be that. However, I see no reason not to believe that there are enough customers here who would like to see it. And again, for you to be a member of a site that shows pissing, fisting, cream, and everything else, you sitting on here throwing a tantrum over the suggestion that LP add rough sex scenes just makes you look petty and ridiculous.

[Tastes Like Ass]

...my reading comprehension couldn't possibly be anywhere near as bad as your arithmetic skills. "3 good scenes a month?" How the fuck did you pull that number out of your ass?

Pay attention. I said that about 90% of the scenes Evil Angel puts out are garbage scenes that only appeal to a small niche. LP only puts out 30 scenes a month, so if 90% of them were garbage, that would leave 3 good scenes a month.

You must not go out to eat a lot, do you? The more appropriate comparison would be applicable to you. You're like the guy who guys into a steakhouse and raises a fuss that the steakhouse should only serve sirloin and not porterhouse just because it didn't serve porterhouse before, and then goes about comparing porterhouse to every other type of food that the steakhouse doesn't serve. Even though it's almost all the same and comes from the same animal, you insist that adding something new to the menu would be a "drastic change" just because you happen not to like it.

I never asked LP to produce everything, neither would I expect it to. I'm suggesting that it continue to produce what it already produces, just rougher and more aggressive. I'm not even saying that every scene needs to be that. However, I see no reason not to believe that there are enough customers here who would like to see it. And again, for you to be a member of a site that shows pissing, fisting, cream, and everything else, you sitting on here throwing a tantrum over the suggestion that LP add rough sex scenes just makes you look petty and ridiculous.

Surprise, surprise. Yet another straw man argument. I never said that rough sex would be a drastic departure from the LP formula. I said that these rape simulation scenes you keep talking about would be a drastic departure. There is a huge difference between rough sex and rape. In fact, LP has already shot a number of rough sex scenes. For example, almost all of Misha Cross's scenes have been on the rough side, and I have no problem with that, because she was clearly into it. She never pretended she was being raped, or tried to get the guys to stop, or any shit like that. It is simply unfathomable to me that you cannot see the huge difference between clearly consensual rough sex and this "rape fantasy" garbage.

If you are so into all this "rape fantasy" stuff, why stop there? Why not ask LP to shoot some "snuff fantasy" scenes, where they pretend to kill the girl, and then fuck her corpse? I'm sure, in your warped mind, that type of scene would also just be a "minor" deviation from the current scenes, right?

[realtip]

Pay attention. I said that about 90% of the scenes Evil Angel puts out are garbage scenes that only appeal to a small niche. LP only puts out 30 scenes a month, so if 90% of them were garbage, that would leave 3 good scenes a month.

I'm paying attention, which is how I know that you're spewing a bunch of bullshit that makes no sense. We're talking about LP here, not Evil Angel. What the fuck does EA content have to do with LP content? They are two completely different sites. You keep bringing up shit that has absolutely nothing with the topic.

Surprise, surprise. Yet another straw man argument. I never said that rough sex would be a drastic departure from the LP formula. I said that these rape simulation scenes you keep talking about would be a drastic departure. There is a huge difference between rough sex and rape. In fact, LP has already shot a number of rough sex scenes. For example, almost all of Misha Cross's scenes have been on the rough side, and I have no problem with that, because she was clearly into it. She never pretended she was being raped, or tried to get the guys to stop, or any shit like that. It is simply unfathomable to me that you cannot see the huge difference between clearly consensual rough sex and this "rape fantasy" garbage.

If you are so into all this "rape fantasy" stuff, why stop there? Why not ask LP to shoot some "snuff fantasy" scenes, where they pretend to kill the girl, and then fuck her corpse? I'm sure, in your warped mind, that type of scene would also just be a "minor" deviation from the current scenes, right?

Surprise, surprise. You wandering off topic yet again with more stupid bullshit. Would it kill you to stick to the topic at hand? If you're not talking about scat, you're talking about Evil Angel. If you're not talking about an "LP formula," you're talking about some other foolishness. Now, you've somehow wandered into talking about snuff flicks. When you learn to stay on topic with your points, maybe then you accuse of people of not properly addressing your points. Until then, you're obviously just reaching and pulling whatever nonsense you can find out of your ass to support your bullshit.

And yes, there is a difference between rough sex and forced sex, but that doesn't mean that they're mutually exclusive. Both are popular. Both are based on fantasy. And there is room for both to be further explored here on LP.

Furthermore, to reply to your question as to why I'm suggesting it here on LP, that is obviously because I feel LP is an ideal site to have it, and would be good at producing it. I don't go to Naughty America or Brazzers to request it because those are vanilla sites that showcase only tame material. It would be stupid to go to a site that barely even has anal or DP and suggest extreme content. I also don't suggest it at Kink because I'm not a member of Kink, and I think Kink sucks.

However, LP is a site that already has extreme content, such as anal, DP, ATM, ATP, cream, pissing, 0% pussy, gangbangs, etc. As you yourself said, some scenes already have rough sex elements in them. Therefore, it is not "drastic" at all to suggest that more scenes include these elements as well as futher explore other areas such as scenarios that involve coercion or female reluctance/resistance. I believe LP has the production talent, performing talent, experience, knowledge, and the audience to be very successful at it.

[Tastes Like Ass]

I'm paying attention, which is how I know that you're spewing a bunch of bullshit that makes no sense. We're talking about LP here, not Evil Angel. What the fuck does EA content have to do with LP content? They are two completely different sites. You keep bringing up shit that has absolutely nothing with the topic.

I've already explained this about a thousand times. If LP starts shooting any fetish that anyone suggests, with no regard for whether it fits in with the other material already here, they'll wind up just like Evil Angel, with a bunch of bizarre crap.

Surprise, surprise. You wandering off topic yet again with more stupid bullshit. Would it kill you to stick to the topic at hand? If you're not talking about scat, you're talking about Evil Angel. If you're not talking about an "LP formula," you're talking about some other foolishness. Now, you've somehow wandered into talking about snuff flicks. When you learn to stay on topic with your points, maybe then you accuse of people of not properly addressing your points. Until then, you're obviously just reaching and pulling whatever nonsense you can find out of your ass to support your bullshit.

What's the difference in pretending to rape a girl or pretending to kill her and fuck the corpse? They're both all about violence, with the sex as a sideshow, and neither one is remotely similar to anything that LP has traditionally produced.

LP is a site that already has extreme content, such as anal, DP, ATM, ATP, cream, pissing, 0% pussy, gangbangs, etc. As you yourself said, some scenes already have rough sex elements in them. Therefore, it is not "drastic" at all to suggest that more scenes include these elements as well as futher explore other areas such as scenarios that involve coercion or female reluctance/resistance.

None of the things that you mention have anything to do with simulated rape scenes. There is just as big a difference (if not more so) between clearly consensual rough sex and simulated rape as there is between ass licking and scat. If you don't understand that, then further discussion with you is obviously pointless.

[realtip]

I've already explained this about a thousand times. If LP starts shooting any fetish that anyone suggests, with no regard for whether it fits in with the other material already here, they'll wind up just like Evil Angel, with a bunch of bizarre crap.

You can explain it a million times. If it doesn't make any sense, then repeating it over and over again isn't going to make it make sense. Nobody is asking LP to do "any fetish." Nobody is asking LP to start producing scenes with 80 year-old midgets fucking 600 lb. clowns in their armpits. I haven't seen anyone asking for anything like this. Suggesting that a site that already produces extreme sex between adult live human beings expand into producing the same extreme sex with elements of female reluctance between the same adult live human beings is not the big end-of-the-world deal that you overexaggerate it to be.

If you don't like it, fine. Then just say you don't like it, and leave it at that. But quit it with the nonsense about how it's some drastic monumental leap from what's already here. That's just plain overreactionary bullshit.

None of the things that you mention have anything to do with simulated rape scenes. There is just as big a difference (if not more so) between clearly consensual rough sex and simulated rape as there is between ass licking and scat. If you don't understand that, then further discussion with you is obviously pointless.

You mean like how you can't tell the difference between simulated force and necrophilia? You just keep coming up with one dumb statement after another. If you really have to keep making these stupid outlandish comparisons to try to prove whatever your ridiculous point is, then you are clearly the one who has a serious problem with basic common sense.

[Tastes Like Ass]

I've already explained this about a thousand times. If LP starts shooting any fetish that anyone suggests, with no regard for whether it fits in with the other material already here, they'll wind up just like Evil Angel, with a bunch of bizarre crap.

You can explain it a million times. If it doesn't make any sense, then repeating it over and over again isn't going to make it make sense. Nobody is asking LP to do "any fetish." Nobody is asking LP to start producing scenes with 80 year-old midgets fucking 600 lb. clowns in their armpits. I haven't seen anyone asking for anything like this. Suggesting that a site that already produces extreme sex between adult live human beings expand into producing the same extreme sex with elements of female reluctance between the same adult live human beings is not the big end-of-the-world deal that you overexaggerate it to be.

If you don't like it, fine. Then just say you don't like it, and leave it at that. But quit it with the nonsense about how it's some drastic monumental leap from what's already here. That's just plain overreactionary bullshit.

None of the things that you mention have anything to do with simulated rape scenes. There is just as big a difference (if not more so) between clearly consensual rough sex and simulated rape as there is between ass licking and scat. If you don't understand that, then further discussion with you is obviously pointless.

You mean like how you can't tell the difference between simulated force and necrophilia? You just keep coming up with one dumb statement after another. If you really have to keep making these stupid outlandish comparisons to try to prove whatever your ridiculous point is, then you are clearly the one who has a serious problem with basic common sense.

Now you seem to have abandoned the straw men, and decided to resort to pure ad hominem attacks and insults. Until you address the points I am making, rather than just yelling and waving your hands, this "discussion" is pointless.

[alongwaysouth]

I still wanna see Simony do her 1st DAP at LP. A 4 or 5 on 1, cocks of all colours and all finishing in her ass.

Other MILFS? Or maybe just veterans? Lucy Lee would be a good start. I'd even be interested to see how Julie Silver fucks these days. Claudia Rossi seems to have worked her way beyond the caper (smart lady, by all reports), so probably a real long shot.

If anyone knows where Angel Dark is these days, she'd be great to have back. My guess is she's probably beefed up a bit, but she did love ATP (even said so to camera once). Took ACP's, too (just not often enough).

Who else? Oh, yeah, the great Moni from back in the Sineplex days. She's done a bit of bondage stuff, too, and man doesn't she do it well. Just a magnificent face and smile. Cherry Jul? Great ass fuck, Cherry. Lis - what a gape. Wendy/Pusia (her scene with Moni was a classic).

Heaps more, obviously.

Is Abelinda/Sarah a MILF yet? The complete anal queen, that girl.

You are aware that just about everybody you listed there hasn't been active in years, right? I don't think Julie Silver, for example, has been seen performing in like 10 years. None of them probably even look the same now as they did when they were performing as they have all most likely aged since they left. With all the hot girls that are in porn right now, I have no idea why some people insist on living in the past.

Cripes, you are a real sad sack, champ. I take it from your 1st sentence you might be suggesting a cognisance shortfall on my part.

How 'bout you do 2 things; 1) Read the subject thread before you jump up and down like a 8 year old and 2) Understand this is a fucking porn forum.

Someone chucked up a thread that prompted a few to ponder the question posed (Note the question mark). And, a few decided to respond.

Then, along comes the clubhouse leader in reality and berates folks for "living in the past". FFS, this ain't reality and all forms of entertainment have a current and a past.

Either piss or get off the pot, champ.

You don't do irony much, do ya?

And, I'd still like to see all the mighty fine ladies I named have another crack at the caper. Let's just say I feel entitled.

[realtip]

alongwaysouth,
Those are some of the most inane ramblings I've ever heard. If you want to nominate porn girls who have been out of the business for a decade, and are probably churchgoing soccer moms by now, then feel free. Nobody is stopping you.

Now you seem to have abandoned the straw men, and decided to resort to pure ad hominem attacks and insults. Until you address the points I am making, rather than just yelling and waving your hands, this "discussion" is pointless.

As stupid as your points are, I have addressed them, despite the fact that most of what you say is not deserving of a serious reply. The discussion (if you can call it that) is pointless because of your senseless statements and repeatedly calling any rebuttal against them a "straw man" or "ad hominem," which is basically just you doing the same thing that you ironically accuse others of doing. Using the "I know you are, but what am I?" line of rhetoric doesn't strengthen your argument. Until you decide to exercise logic and make statements that are grounded in facts and a modicum of intelligence, then you're right that this is indeed pointless.

[Cynewulf30]

Wiska is a milf now, bring here back and i would pay top money for that scene.

[Pineapples Studio]

She's not coming back. Wiska has been through a lot of shit as a result of her porn career and I think she's just happy to be living a normal life with her husband and kids now. I talked to her a few days ago, actually, and trust me when I say she is done with hardcore porn.

Never say never, but it's not happening any time soon.

[USfans_are_retards]

good to hear she´s fine!!! A true gem

[Symbalar]

Simony, now or never.

[dpconnoisseur1]

+1 for more MILFs, but attractive ones like Eva Karrera!

[macklemore]

definitely more milfs. the bustier the better. also if you could get a big name like ava devine that would be great

[ElJab78]

Good idea , sandra romain , kathy anderson , stacy silver and more

Is Kathy Anderson still active? I know her last new scene I can think of was for the first Assfucked MILFS from Dave Perry from 2012. I would love to see her brought back for some scenes if she is active.

[kidloco]

I believe she is still available in a way. I would add Sandra De Marco to the list.
I have an idea that gor instance Giorgio could shoot like 2 or 3 scenes with these milf former top actress, like a mini
gangbang with 3-4 of them.I'd go for Jessica Fiorentino, Stacy Silver, Kathy Anderson, Sandra de Marco, Bibi Fox

[marcimilan10]

+1


With Anita Winter maybe

[marcimilan10]

Mature Like this. Kelly Leigh

[gapefan]

+1 for more MILFs, but attractive ones like Eva Karrera!

I agree with dpconnoisseur1

I love attractive MILFs like Eva Karrera and Veronica Avluv!!!

But at some point they are outside my personal preferences...

^Nothing against you marcimilan10, but the lady above is a good example of one who I personally don't find very attractive.

[Tastes Like Ass]

...the lady above is a good example of one who I personally don't find very attractive.

Hey, wait a minute, Mr. Sensitivity. Aren't you afraid of hurting this lady's feelings?

[gapefan]

You bet I am. Thats why I clearly stated it was my only my own personal preference and did so in a respectful and tactful manner and tone, rather than simply insulting.

Because I'm just as afraid of hurting her feelings, as you are of contributing to his performance anxiety ...

You guys are way too focused on the dudes.

The reason why we're so "focused on the dudes" is that it's very frustrating to see so many potentially great scenes being largely ruined by incompetent male performers. (I won't name names, since apparently some of them read the forums and are very sensitive. I definitely wouldn't want to do anything to contribute to their performance anxiety.)

Mr. Sensitivity

If you were half as worried about women's feelings as you are men's, you and I would have never had this conversation

[Tastes Like Ass]

You bet I am. Thats why I clearly stated it was my only my own personal preference and did so in a respectful and tactful manner and tone, rather than simply insulting.

Because I'm just as afraid of hurting her feelings, as you are of contributing to his performance anxiety ...

You guys are way too focused on the dudes.

The reason why we're so "focused on the dudes" is that it's very frustrating to see so many potentially great scenes being largely ruined by incompetent male performers. (I won't name names, since apparently some of them read the forums and are very sensitive. I definitely wouldn't want to do anything to contribute to their performance anxiety.)

Mr. Sensitivity

If you were half as worried about women's feelings as you are men's, you and I would have never had this conversation

You can't be as stupid as you seem. You really think it's more "respectful and tactful" to call a woman ugly* based on something (her age) that's completely out of her control than to make some lighthearted jokes about a misspelled tattoo?

And by the way, the comment about not wanting to contribute to the guy's performance anxiety was clearly sarcasm, as anyone with half a brain should be able to see. I have no problem naming the names of bad male performers, as I have done several times. For example: Charlie Mac, Nacho Vidal, Franco Roccaforte, to name just three. Unlike you, I do not post comments for the purpose of flattering or offending. I simply state my opinion, and let the chips fall where they may.

*Please refrain from pedantically pointing out that you did not use the word "ugly", as that was nevertheless clearly the implication of your comment. Before arguing, look up the word "ugly" in the dictionary.

[gapefan]

^Surely you can't be as dense as you seem

Perhaps you just need to go back and read it again

Please do not talk about pornstars, directors or producers as if they are not here. (Katsumi sums it up nicely.) We are lucky to have industry participants, and they are paying attention to your constructive criticism. That is not to say there can not be any criticism. There most certainly can be. However, insults will get you nowhere and lead to the deactivation of your forum account. If you choose to criticize, do so constructively and with respect.

I didn't "call" her anything. That would be disrespectful. I stated my own personal level of attraction, or in this case lack thereof
(btw, for those of you who are a little slow, that's the part where stating an opinion with tact and respect came in)

I will point out the fact that I didn't use any derogatory words, because it's a fact. No matter how hard you try to change what you would like others to believe the implications of my comment might be, it will never change what I actually said, or make what I am saying now, any less true


And by the way, your comment about not wanting to contribute to the guys performance anxiety is clearly open to interpretation. At least by your logic. It's quite possible for us to draw all kinds of implications from what you said!

What's the matter TLA? You don't like others taking your words out of context and making up implications? But it's okay for you to turn around and do the same to them?
(btw, you don't actually have to answer that, just in case you didn't already know...those are called "rhetorical questions")

*Please refrain from pedantically trying to put words in other peoples mouths


And do try to stay on topic, instead of derailing this thread like you do so many others...

I know, that's a lot to ask of someone with such limited intellect and social skills, but give it a shot. You'll never get any better at it, if you don't practice


And now, back to the question at hand...More MILFs?

[Holditstrong]

Love to see India Summer make a visit to LP. She done some hard scenes with Kink so I'm sure she'd love the LP guys

[Tastes Like Ass]

I will point out the fact that I didn't use any derogatory words, because it's a fact. No matter how hard you try to change what you would like others to believe the implications of my comment might be, it will never change what I actually said, or make what I am saying now, any less true

Whether or not you used "derogatory words" does not change the meaning of what you wrote, which was clearly an insult, plain and simple.

And by the way, your comment about not wanting to contribute to the guys performance anxiety is clearly open to interpretation. At least by your logic. It's quite possible for us to draw all kinds of implications from what you said!

Oh, you're free to draw whatever conclusions you want, and you are also free to voice those conclusions, even if doing so makes you sound like even more of an idiot.

*Please refrain from pedantically trying to put words in other peoples mouths

Please refrain from using words that you clearly don't understand the meaning of.

And do try to stay on topic, instead of derailing this thread like you do so many others...

To paraphrase something you said to me elsewhere: If you go around making hypocritical comments, don't be surprised if I call you out on it.

[gapefan]

^The very same applies to you as well, TLA!!!

That is, unless you're some kind of...hypocrite!?!


And by the way, my use of the word 'pedantically' was clearly sarcasm, as anyone with half a brain should be able to see


I figured staying on topic would be difficult for you...

Here, let me help. This is the "More MILFs?" thread

And I for one, would LOVE to see more attractive MILFs!!!