Iddaoeeok wrote:Stop posting pictures of Emily Thorne? No way!
JohnnyMcSpunkencock wrote:Emily Thorne double anal training SZ1290
Bjergmand wrote:It's an old scene. She's probably NOT coming back...
bdsmpretty wrote:is she actually back? i'm to lazy to follow the number scheme but can anyone in the know say how recent this scene might be?
Iddaoeeok wrote:bdsmpretty wrote:is she actually back? i'm to lazy to follow the number scheme but can anyone in the know say how recent this scene might be?
March 2016. I've given up trying to explain the LP system of numbering scheme even though a child of 5 could understand it.
Iddaoeeok wrote:bdsmpretty wrote:is she actually back? i'm to lazy to follow the number scheme but can anyone in the know say how recent this scene might be?
March 2016. I've given up trying to explain the LP system of numbering scheme even though a child of 5 could understand it.
Bjergmand wrote:Iddaoeeok wrote:bdsmpretty wrote:is she actually back? i'm to lazy to follow the number scheme but can anyone in the know say how recent this scene might be?
March 2016. I've given up trying to explain the LP system of numbering scheme even though a child of 5 could understand it.
No one is forcing you to reply? Especially not with an attitude... Just ignore it if it pisses you off
Iddaoeeok wrote:Someone asked a question, I answered it. Otherwise they wouldn't have known when the scene was shot. I call that very thoughtful and kind.
dap-addict wrote:One month later still in Southern exile:
Does this tit ask for a return?
dap-addict wrote:Indeed!
Instabuy to me!
Its sort of extra kink knowing she was already engaged and planning her wedding in that southern place when she flew over all the way to Prague to perform some more DAPs for LP. That's true porn biz committement!
dap-addict wrote:Why always so harsh?
Love is about acceptance.
When they met each job was clear.
She finished hers and than she moved to him.
Better yet for her fans she kept what she was doing, but they didnt want that.
YumYum74 wrote:Happy to be proven wrong but I would take this with mountains of salt tbh.
Bjergmand wrote:<url removed>
Is this for real?!
Users browsing this forum: Asslover104, Sergio8317 and 113 guests