Yeah, you got DAP in that "any" scene so all is fine, I know.dap-addict wrote:Couldn't we agree that in the special case when GIO releases TS ANY b/g scene released by them is a fair option for non-TS but still GIO fans?
Yeah, you got DAP in that "any" scene so all is fine, I know.dap-addict wrote:Couldn't we agree that in the special case when GIO releases TS ANY b/g scene released by them is a fair option for non-TS but still GIO fans?
dobly58277 wrote:We have the option to look elsewhere for our tastes, not have our favourite sites infiltrated by quota friendly genetic defected garbage.
dobly58277 wrote:My position is that while LP is a mixed bag, piss, fisting, DAP, TAP etc, which is fairly trendy and not even niche these days, we should not be subjected to material that most will find distasteful within the context of their preference.
alex2200 wrote:I assume 90 percent of LP subscriber and visitor are straight guys.so the problem with Natalie is not personal animosity but the fact is straight guys like me dont want to see this kind of stuff.LP should launch another website with gay or TS content but not here.even worse is the time of this scene release . I waited so long for 10 on 10 orgy for Xmas but now what a LP gave us is TS getting TAPed...that is insulting![]()
![]()
alex2200 wrote:I assume 90 percent of LP subscriber and visitor are straight guys.so the problem with Natalie is not personal animosity but the fact is straight guys like me dont want to see this kind of stuff.LP should launch another website with gay or TS content but not here.even worse is the time of this scene release . I waited so long for 10 on 10 orgy for Xmas but now what a LP gave us is TS getting TAPed...that is insulting![]()
![]()
dobly58277 wrote:Soul trend - Oi Friendo, by getting personal, which I didn't, even to the performer himself, you are suggesting that my preference for straight sex on a straight sex site is what? - offensive? That I don't care for, or even find this scene vomit-inducing is a testament to bigotry? How so? If I choose to regard LP as the No.1 source of straight gangbang porn in Europe only to one find that the site has been infected with this sort of crap, then I'm a bad person?? What drivel. If trannies want to do their tranny thing, that's all well and good by me, but like society as a whole, schools too, we're being forced to accept this as a norm when it certainly isn't, at least for the majority of the public. Who in their right mind suddenly wants to see this as routine business? It always starts small then no doubt in time LP will have descended into three ring circus territory. Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right. For every positive comment here there is a negative so your analysis might need recalibrating. The entire thread is dominated by one subscriber ILOVESHEBI so the reaction of support is shy of cheering crowds by far. My point is this: LP is a straight sex site catering to straight sex customers. As I said before, if straight sex was marketed on a trans site, there would mascara dripping everywhere. At the end of the day, if a dog is born in a pig pen, it's still a dog. And that is not a woman, never will be, and that is gay sex, not glossed over in any way. Rather than have your faithful subscribers reaching for a bucket, create a separate site and fill your boots with a estrogen infused rainbow coloured freakshow. As usual the handbag twirling brigade seek to gain entry where it's obvious they don't belong and scream blue murder when they don't get their way. My money says that LP will pursue this prevailing fashion until the site "trans forms" into something utterly unrecognisable. You mention that many performers here are trans of of that ilk...who?
dobly58277 wrote:Soul trend - Oi Friendo, by getting personal, which I didn't, even to the performer himself, you are suggesting that my preference for straight sex on a straight sex site is what? - offensive? That I don't care for, or even find this scene vomit-inducing is a testament to bigotry? How so? If I choose to regard LP as the No.1 source of straight gangbang porn in Europe only to one find that the site has been infected with this sort of crap, then I'm a bad person?? What drivel. If trannies want to do their tranny thing, that's all well and good by me, but like society as a whole, schools too, we're being forced to accept this as a norm when it certainly isn't, at least for the majority of the public. Who in their right mind suddenly wants to see this as routine business? It always starts small then no doubt in time LP will have descended into three ring circus territory. Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right. For every positive comment here there is a negative so your analysis might need recalibrating. The entire thread is dominated by one subscriber ILOVESHEBI so the reaction of support is shy of cheering crowds by far. My point is this: LP is a straight sex site catering to straight sex customers. As I said before, if straight sex was marketed on a trans site, there would mascara dripping everywhere. At the end of the day, if a dog is born in a pig pen, it's still a dog. And that is not a woman, never will be, and that is gay sex, not glossed over in any way. Rather than have your faithful subscribers reaching for a bucket, create a separate site and fill your boots with a estrogen infused rainbow coloured freakshow. As usual the handbag twirling brigade seek to gain entry where it's obvious they don't belong and scream blue murder when they don't get their way. My money says that LP will pursue this prevailing fashion until the site "trans forms" into something utterly unrecognisable. You mention that many performers here are trans of of that ilk...who?
Songxx1 wrote:i have nothing against TS ppl but i really dont like how this industry try to force straight porn fans like me to watch and even woreship tansexuals. i feel abused by these transexuals and how idustry putting them in to straight porn when 10-15 years ago it would be a niche of gay gene. im in to pussies and woman assholes not in to penises/balls. I feel abused when now this industry telling me to look how TS stock her COCK and they telling me to be ok with that and get horny to it. No i wont be ok with that and i wont get horny to that. i feel like im getting brainwashed. its hella wrong cuz its slur diffrance between man amd woman body in my head... sometimes i really wonder were this world going? Now we are at this point when be white and straight person is something wrong.
dobly58277 wrote:Songxx1 wrote:i have nothing against TS ppl but i really dont like how this industry try to force straight porn fans like me to watch and even woreship tansexuals. i feel abused by these transexuals and how idustry putting them in to straight porn when 10-15 years ago it would be a niche of gay gene. im in to pussies and woman assholes not in to penises/balls. I feel abused when now this industry telling me to look how TS stock her COCK and they telling me to be ok with that and get horny to it. No i wont be ok with that and i wont get horny to that. i feel like im getting brainwashed. its hella wrong cuz its slur diffrance between man amd woman body in my head... sometimes i really wonder were this world going? Now we are at this point when be white and straight person is something wrong.
Yes we regular humans apparently are viewed as truly uncomely for those who drink their own piss and destroy their bodies. What a trooper to be able to do that. What a life change for the good (snark snark) Thankfully though, it's a troll niche for the subterranean set that has a small and indistinct voice in any quarter, even here. Any resistance to that and you're " a bad person" or "you're a bigot" and all the other memes we're bored of. Intolerance to alternate (conventional? opinions of course. Let not your heart be troubled.
CanadianCouple wrote:dobly58277 wrote:Soul trend - Oi Friendo, by getting personal, which I didn't, even to the performer himself, you are suggesting that my preference for straight sex on a straight sex site is what? - offensive? That I don't care for, or even find this scene vomit-inducing is a testament to bigotry? How so? If I choose to regard LP as the No.1 source of straight gangbang porn in Europe only to one find that the site has been infected with this sort of crap, then I'm a bad person?? What drivel. If trannies want to do their tranny thing, that's all well and good by me, but like society as a whole, schools too, we're being forced to accept this as a norm when it certainly isn't, at least for the majority of the public. Who in their right mind suddenly wants to see this as routine business? It always starts small then no doubt in time LP will have descended into three ring circus territory. Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right. For every positive comment here there is a negative so your analysis might need recalibrating. The entire thread is dominated by one subscriber ILOVESHEBI so the reaction of support is shy of cheering crowds by far. My point is this: LP is a straight sex site catering to straight sex customers. As I said before, if straight sex was marketed on a trans site, there would mascara dripping everywhere. At the end of the day, if a dog is born in a pig pen, it's still a dog. And that is not a woman, never will be, and that is gay sex, not glossed over in any way. Rather than have your faithful subscribers reaching for a bucket, create a separate site and fill your boots with a estrogen infused rainbow coloured freakshow. As usual the handbag twirling brigade seek to gain entry where it's obvious they don't belong and scream blue murder when they don't get their way. My money says that LP will pursue this prevailing fashion until the site "trans forms" into something utterly unrecognisable. You mention that many performers here are trans of of that ilk...who?
You spend your porn time here looking at dicks rubbing against one another every day and yet its vomit inducing if one of the dicks flapping on your screen is attached to Natalie Mars. Fine, feel that way but FFS stop trying to impose your choices on everyone else.
LP has a ton of content, watch the dicks you like rubbing together, and skip over the scene the has a dick you don't like.
I think you're confused about how voyeurism works. As I attempted to join the dots for the other troll, seeing a dick in porn kinda comes with the territory universally right? Right? I mean we're not trying to rewrite the gospel at this late stage are we? Or have we missed something??. Does that mean, by your logic, that because of all dicks in porn it makes the male viewers gay? Are you truly going to stand by that retarded remark? There has to be a penis i the room to allow sex to happen. Try your argument in the court of public opinion. The difference is in the focus of the scene. A man using his dick on another man is the line crossed. A woman servicing multiple dicks is a fantasy, an outlet that many men here will never realise. The viewer is imagining his/her self in that role, or to witness something that is normally hidden. Still with me? Do heterosexuals assert their preferences on gay people, or would they try? Why would they bother? When this largely ousted niche shoulders it's way through the door (because it has no other choice), the usual zealots follow and try to convince everyone that they're gay too. Cringe-worthy. Desperate. Deluded.
Pretty simple
dobly58277 wrote:My distaste, rather than prejudice will not in any way cause harm or injury that results or may result from some action or judgement here. Words are not violence, contrary to the belief of snowflakes and the self afflicted or oft-offended. Trannies is the common vernacular in the real world. Pardon me for shattering the illusion. The sight is more unappealing than the word believe me. I feel truly sorry for someone that has to go through life bending over backwards (or forward), to enact a nuances of the opposite sex whilst never attaining any nadir or semblance of true normalcy. They will always be the point on the sphere below the observer and where, sadly, any level of success or acceptance is that of porn sites, alternative media, or acceptance within the narrowest of margins. But that is my own opinion and not an attack on the performer here. An opinion is not a knife stroke or an assault however sobering it might seem so sense brooding on what is commonly held as rudimentary. If LP chooses to embellish it's content with material that conventional members might not like, then do what most porn retail sites do...segregate. Straight section, Gay section. Yes even thumbnails can be off-putting. Talk about a killer for your dick catching a glance of a guy with tits and a shrunken dick. That could turn a funeral up an alley. It amazes me that folks who can tolerate extreme sex acts on here wilt at the slightest "othering" of what doesn't fit here as a rule. Porn is liberal in it's own right, but there are rules. The drive to thrust forward the oddities and sideshows, particularly in the media has died a sad death. In porn it'll hang around but go back to it's own shelf space eventually.
dobly58277 wrote:Soul trend - Oi Friendo, by getting personal, which I didn't, even to the performer himself, you are suggesting that my preference for straight sex on a straight sex site is what? - offensive?
dobly58277 wrote:Who in their right mind suddenly wants to see this as routine business?
dobly58277 wrote:Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right.
dobly58277 wrote:The entire thread is dominated by one subscriber ILOVESHEBI so the reaction of support is shy of cheering crowds by far.
dobly58277 wrote:Rather than have your faithful subscribers reaching for a bucket, create a separate site and fill your boots with a estrogen infused rainbow coloured freakshow.
soultrend wrote:dobly58277 wrote:Soul trend - Oi Friendo, by getting personal, which I didn't, even to the performer himself, you are suggesting that my preference for straight sex on a straight sex site is what? - offensive?
At no point did I comment on your sexual preference, I couldn't care less. I am stating, not suggesting, that the language you're using to talk about Natalie is disgustingly offensive, there is literally no excuse for it. To say that you haven't been personal demonstrates a complete lack of self awareness.dobly58277 wrote:Who in their right mind suddenly wants to see this as routine business?
Probably the customer's who made her scenes so successful.dobly58277 wrote:Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right.
It's not debatable at all, it's a fact. The best sellers tab lists scenes in order of how well they sold.dobly58277 wrote:The entire thread is dominated by one subscriber ILOVESHEBI so the reaction of support is shy of cheering crowds by far.
The reaction of support is demonstrated in the sales, how many choose to be vocal about it on the forum is irrelevant.dobly58277 wrote:Rather than have your faithful subscribers reaching for a bucket, create a separate site and fill your boots with a estrogen infused rainbow coloured freakshow.
The numbers indicate they were reaching for their tickets.
dobly58277 wrote:Pass me a bucket. Sad, yet frightfully comical. A celebration of self-mutilation. The future for this poor guy ain't pretty...
Giorgio Grandi wrote:dobly58277 wrote:Pass me a bucket. Sad, yet frightfully comical. A celebration of self-mutilation. The future for this poor guy ain't pretty...
Why did you post this picture?
aspen76 wrote:
"Porn is liberal in it's own right, but there are rules." You just demonstrated that you really are an idiot. The inviolable rules of porn are to do nothing that is not in common agreement between the performers. To say that an idiot who is insecure about his own sexuality and does not want to see something that bothers him in this fragile sexuality is against the rules, is something that you got out of your head. Speaking of normalcy in relation to issues involving gender and sexuality is a demonstration that you have stopped in time. It has problems? Leave the forum, call a psychologist, and resolve these insecurity issues.
soultrend wrote:dobly58277 wrote:Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right.
It's not debatable at all, it's a fact. The best sellers tab lists scenes in order of how well they sold.
lesbest wrote:... Of course it has great sales, it's the only videos of this style on the site, so all the fans of this genre will buy it.
lesbest wrote:aspen76 wrote:
"Porn is liberal in it's own right, but there are rules." You just demonstrated that you really are an idiot. The inviolable rules of porn are to do nothing that is not in common agreement between the performers. To say that an idiot who is insecure about his own sexuality and does not want to see something that bothers him in this fragile sexuality is against the rules, is something that you got out of your head. Speaking of normalcy in relation to issues involving gender and sexuality is a demonstration that you have stopped in time. It has problems? Leave the forum, call a psychologist, and resolve these insecurity issues.
Infantile reasoning ... So if I don't like watching people shit on themselves is it because I have doubts about being scatophile then?soultrend wrote:dobly58277 wrote:Your assertion that this was one of the top scenes of all time is debatable, but you could be right.
It's not debatable at all, it's a fact. The best sellers tab lists scenes in order of how well they sold.
Of course it has great sales, it's the only videos of this style on the site, so all the fans of this genre will buy it.
... If there was only one anal video on the site it would also be ranked as top seller because all the fans of this genre would jump on it, but it is not the case, there are tons of anal scenes and unless you are very rich it is impossible to buy them all, you have to make choices so less sales per video => sales are divided, in your case they are unilateral ...
I have nothing against anyone and I wish Natalie the best, I respect her work but I would also like to have my opinion respected, asking for a filter is is by no means an implication of banishment of trans porn but simply a question of living together.
Tolerance is not a one-way street, it must be mutual.
If you feel offended by the word "filter" (which wasn't meant that way) =>
You all have "filters" on [spam], only following what and who you like.
I don't care about the Kardashians so i ain't following them => no mentions at all in my journal.
I like football so i follow it => football publications appears in my journal.
Oh and if you use the following excuse: "what are you doing here on this topic then"
I'll answer I saw that a filter might arrive and I wanted to see if it had progressed.
Anyway ...
simplyme wrote:I don't understand all this hate ... respect for Natalie please.
IMHO Natalie's performances on LP are great and she deserves to come back.
Users browsing this forum: feltrough, supermorini and 94 guests