CanadianCouple wrote:Here we go again.
gangbangfan99 wrote:CanadianCouple wrote:Here we go again.
Fuck off dude. It's a discussion. Not everyone has to have the same opinion as you.
Kaderon wrote:There are no more surprise elements, no WOW effects.
visigoth2020111 wrote:it is all the way down,
the money man is producing for tube sites where the real money is, but producers get none of it
xxx wrote:Yet we have more members than ever.
visigoth2020111 wrote:Mrxxx this is your site and you own it and you’ll do as you please.
gangbangfan99 wrote:CanadianCouple wrote:Here we go again.
Fuck off dude. It's a discussion. Not everyone has to have the same opinion as you.
visigoth2020111 wrote:.......good bye LP
visigoth2020111 wrote:xxx wrote:visigoth2020111 wrote:it is all the way down,
the money man is producing for tube sites where the real money is, but producers get none of it
I'll ban and wipe your account unless you apologize and recognize that you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. In reality partner studios have always been making way more than we have.
Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. "Speech" is not limited to public speaking and is generally taken to include other forms of expression. The right is preserved in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is granted formal recognition by the laws of most nations. Nonetheless the degree to which the right is upheld in practice varies greatly from one nation to another. In many nations, particularly those with authoritarian forms of government, overt government censorship is enforced. Censorship has also been claimed to occur in other forms (see propaganda model) and there are different approaches to issues such as hate speech, obscenity, and defamation laws.
Mrxxx this is your site and you own it and you’ll do as you please. Now the question is, di I brake any of the forums rules?
I just expressed mi mind from all the reading I have done about MindGeek, And you want to punish me, who will be next.
xxx wrote:Yet we have more members than ever.
Pissing wrote:I really do not understand guys complaining about LP.
Pissing wrote:Without LP, my life would be dull.
otto1219 wrote:It's not what's in front of the camera at LP that is the problem, it's what's behind the camera.
dap-addict wrote:IV is just an own universe basically. Joachim is really listening critics finally, while at the same a lot of IV antiques keep a grip and wont change ever it seems.
dap-addict wrote:Basically at gonzo and GIO there is a feel like they are convinced they found the right recipe and wont change much anymore. Good example is the Polly Petrova lingerie reference. Generally one could say they dont care much about lingerie and how girls are dressed to fuck anyway, while here would be a cheap way to easily create different moods and be less repetitive. But while @ gonzo Luis assistants choose excellent girls usually, nobody seems to care to instruct Luis how to dress and how to film them.
xxx wrote:Yet we have more members than ever.
gangbangfan99 wrote:xxx wrote:Yet we have more members than ever.
You're admitting now that because you have 'more members than ever' that it's okay to be lazy and continuously produce the same type of scenes with the same girls over and over.
hjohjole wrote:xxx wrote:Yet we have more members than ever.
What if it turns out that poor quality porn actually have a bigger audience and brings more members to the site than good porn does. What then? Are you just going to follow the money and let this become a website for grannys, trannys and pussy porn if it turns out that is what sells best?
Is there really no pride or ambition to create the very best porn there is anymore? It seemed to me that this always used to be the main driving force behind LP productions up until about the end of 2016.
dap-addict wrote:Directing and camerawork is indeed becoming a problem mainly because its too repetitive. At GIO I really always wait for Giorgio Grandi himself directing a scene again, its such another feel! At Gonzo it became much more repetitive since Luis had gonzo monopoly after Stefano and Proxy had to leave duely. Still I don´t get why they wont find new loyal directors for gonzo.
Basically at Gonzo and GIO there is a feel like they are convinced they found the right recipe and wont change much anymore. Luis himself is kept in his same old success model, boring the hell out of users more and more since it´s always the same intro, the same sequence of positions etc. Same with GIOs assistant director(s).
I hope LP mastermind behind IDs this problem because gaining new members is one thing but keeping them interested over a longer period another.
magizi87 wrote:I'm mind blown by dap-addict's comment. I thought he was such a massive fanboi, that he could see no wrong. haha.
Same here.
In a way I'm happy that LP is making them more money than it did before. But I'm sad because it looks like the only thing they care about, is money.
Same feeling here.
There are more people watching movies today than 25 years ago and they are more expensive. So, of course movies will make more money. See? Same situation.
Yeah, see. But LP and Giorgio deny to see it.
You know, awesome porn isn't necessarily the best selling porn.
This!
I mean, for me, THE best movie, is Katie Sottile first ever porn scene. That was just on a whole other level of amazing, lol.
And it flew under everyone else radar.
Not under my radar. All Katie Sottile scenes are still in my personal top scenes ever.
Where are the girls, who really get off in LP scenes?
And where are the male performers, who really can give a girl orgasms?
And why shoot LP directors mainly "next position" acrobatic exercises instead of allowing a flow which leads to possible orgasms?
Giorgio Grandi wrote:... And said all of that, when you go to purchase the DVD of old Lion King in a DVD shop, you do not shout to the shop manager telling you want the old one because the new one sucks (in your opinion), you just purchase another movie or you came back to the shop another day.
avanfurwet wrote:^Good post, thanks for posting.Giorgio Grandi wrote:... And said all of that, when you go to purchase the DVD of old Lion King in a DVD shop, you do not shout to the shop manager telling you want the old one because the new one sucks (in your opinion), you just purchase another movie or you came back to the shop another day.
True, but also the producers of Lion King:
(a) don't make several scenes a week ~ so they can't be agile like you in responding to sales and audience reaction.
(b) don't AFAIK run a forum where fans can exchange ideas and views and sometimes interact with the producers.
(even if only a tiny minority of fans participate, and are noisy and badly behaved and post 99% pure BS.)
So thanks for interacting
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests