The girls are getting worse...

[Cryptor]

Whats up with Legalporno site ? The Girls are get worse and worser. Tattoogirls, 08/15 Girls, no more beautys anymore ?
Like to see some elegants ladys not this junkie girls

[drevokocur66]

Whats up with Legalporno site ? The Girls are get worse and worser. Tattoogirls, 08/15 Girls, no more beautys anymore ?
Like to see some elegants ladys not this junkie girls

Economy is too good, you will have to wait for a recession to see better looking porn girls.

[head-gone240]

Have You seen:
Megan Venturi
Nikki Hill
Kate Rich
Alessandra Amore
Vicky Sol
Lina Luxa
Jessica (Finland)
Lana Sharapova
Mary Rose
Nicole Black

Every woman listed (With the exception of Vicky) Doesn't have a single tattoo and could easily participate in beauty pageants.

[Iddaoeeok]

... Alita Angel, Sofi Smile, there are some astonishingly good looking girls on LP right now.

[YumYum74]

Whats up with Legalporno site ? The Girls are get worse and worser. Tattoogirls, 08/15 Girls, no more beautys anymore ?
Like to see some elegants ladys not this junkie girls

What have you been smoking?

[Kaderon]

I wouldn't choose such drastic words as Cryptor, but I'm bored of all the skinny girls. Is GG allergic to curves and breasts?

[Iddaoeeok]

I wouldn't choose such drastic words as Cryptor, but I'm bored of all the skinny girls. Is GG allergic to curves and breasts?

He's married to Tarra White so that hardly seems likely!

[IndyPleco]

I wouldn't choose such drastic words as Cryptor, but I'm bored of all the skinny girls. Is GG allergic to curves and breasts?

xxx has explained this to death. He wants to get them in but they simply sell less than skinny girls. Convince your fellow consumers to buy them and they’ll make more.

[IndyPleco]

Why do you think GG is shooting TS? It sells. Simple as that.

[Kaderon]

I wouldn't choose such drastic words as Cryptor, but I'm bored of all the skinny girls. Is GG allergic to curves and breasts?

xxx has explained this to death. He wants to get them in but they simply sell less than skinny girls. Convince your fellow consumers to buy them and they’ll make more.

Okay, I didn't know that. But I also did not know that the LP audience so obsessed with girls who have bodies like 10-year-old boys.

[avanfurwet]

Whats up with Legalporno site ? The Girls are get worse and worser. Tattoogirls, 08/15 Girls, no more beautys anymore ?
Like to see some elegants ladys not this junkie girls

Congratulations on lowering the bar for the worst post ever.

I didn't think it was possible, but you proved me wrong.

[DoubleOrNothing]

Whats up with Legalporno site ? The Girls are get worse and worser. Tattoogirls, 08/15 Girls, no more beautys anymore ?
Like to see some elegants ladys not this junkie girls

Right? Ginebra Bellucci, Veronica Leal, Polly Petrova, Sofi Smile, Cindy Shine. Plain girls. Vanilla sex. Where are the beauties?







LP has gone to shit.

[TheGoodGuy]

I wouldn't choose such drastic words as Cryptor, but I'm bored of all the skinny girls. Is GG allergic to curves and breasts?

xxx has explained this to death. He wants to get them in but they simply sell less than skinny girls. Convince your fellow consumers to buy them and they’ll make more.

Okay, I didn't know that. But I also did not know that the LP audience so obsessed with girls who have bodies like 10-year-old boys.

Very well said bro, very well said!

[Object_O]

Especially, when it is being claimed girls looking like teenage boys are selling better than women with curves like Jolee Love, Karolina Star, Mea Melone, Lauren Phillips, etc.
That's the cheapest argument I've heard and just don't buy it

[IndyPleco]

Especially, when it is being claimed girls looking like teenage boys are selling better than women with curves like Jolee Love, Karolina Star, Mea Melone, Lauren Phillips, etc.
That's the cheapest argument I've heard and just don't buy it

You don't have to buy the argument, you have to buy the scenes.

It seems pretty unfalsifiable unless someone on the inside is actively tampering with the best sellers list. Or are you one of those conspiracy theorists who think that "the man" is out to get them?

[Iddaoeeok]

LP has a pretty straightforward approach, if a girl's scenes sell she's asked back, if not she isn't. It's as simple as that.

[Angel Eyes]

The OP must be blind.

Emily Pink
Nikki Hill
Polly Pons
Jolee Love
Kira Thorn
Sarah Cute
Nicole Black

Beauties all...and those are the ones that just popped into my head. There are plenty more. In fact, I was thinking the quality of girls has been on the rise for several months.

[Kaderon]

LP has a pretty straightforward approach, if a girl's scenes sell she's asked back, if not she isn't. It's as simple as that.

And that's really sad. It kills all development, all creativity. Check out today's update. Kira Thorn and Anna de Ville. Not even a week ago, there was a scene with Anna de Ville every day for 3 days...and now there is a scene with her again. With someone who already has 50.000 scenes for LP.

It's madness and it's madness that fans pay for the same stuff over and over and over again.

[mail328]

Check out today's update. Kira Thorn and Anna de Ville. Not even a week ago, there was a scene with Anna de Ville every day for 3 days...and now there is a scene with her again. With someone who already has 50.000 scenes for LP.

And I bought all of them. Just to make sure another 50.000 will come.

All you cry babies can’t accept that there is no DVP with fat girls as long as anal with skinny hotties sells better. Go to other pay sites that feature whales in the first place instead of trying to change a working concept around here

[Kaderon]

And I bought all of them. Just to make sure another 50.000 will come.

Guess there is no entertainment industry where it is easier to take money out of people's pockets than the lonely porn addict.

All you cry babies can’t accept that there is no DVP with fat girls as long as anal with skinny hotties sells better. Go to other pay sites that feature whales in the first place instead of trying to change a working concept around here

So the next step after the skinny girl is a fat whale... you guys are really nuts.

[Iddaoeeok]

LP has a pretty straightforward approach, if a girl's scenes sell she's asked back, if not she isn't. It's as simple as that.

And that's really sad. It kills all development, all creativity. Check out today's update. Kira Thorn and Anna de Ville. Not even a week ago, there was a scene with Anna de Ville every day for 3 days...and now there is a scene with her again. With someone who already has 50.000 scenes for LP.

It's madness and it's madness that fans pay for the same stuff over and over and over again.

Then the problem is with LP users not with LP - and there's nothing much anyone can do about that.

[deviliscoming]

And I bought all of them. Just to make sure another 50.000 will come.

All you cry babies can’t accept that there is no DVP with fat girls as long as anal with skinny hotties sells better. Go to other pay sites that feature whales in the first place instead of trying to change a working concept around here

Aahhh , STFU .
Ppl come to this thread to comment about their opinion .
So don't act like you are boss.

Well this is new to me, Calling larg women fat whale!!! ... LOL
Maybe youre tiny dick can't satisfy larg women

[mail328]

Aahhh , STFU .

Another cry baby

[smartboy77]

Could we agree on young girls with boobs and leave tattoos out of the discussion ?

[avanfurwet]

The problem is that there are a lot of us who find tattoos unattractive and won't purchase a scene in which the model is covered with them. While there are a ton of people who either love or do not care one way or the other, they still purchase scenes with people who do not have tattoos. The current fashion makes it difficult to find models without tattoos who will act in hardcore scenes.

Over time I've become a bit more accepting of tattoos. Or desensitised.

Previously I was phobic about anything more than a cute little drawing on her shoulder, hip or rump.
Now I'm a bit less picky, which is just as well because tattoos are in fashion and that's that.

But I still can't see past today's huge multi-coloured tattoos where a girl turns herself into a walking mural.
And I can't cope at all with split tongues, elongated earlobes, extensive piercings, facial tattoos, etc.

Because I'm too fucking old.
And the pretty girls I remember from my past were all natural.

[Pissing]

As long as LP has skinny girls like Emily Pink and Polly Petrova, I will keep on buying scenes, especially when they feature Piss.
But it would be even better when LP would have real skinny girls, the way skinny used to be......, say 10 years ago.

Nowadays girls might even be called skinny when they are below 45 kilo.
I would never call a girl skinny unless she is below 39 kilo. (depending on her length of course)

[IndyPleco]

Nowadays girls might even be called skinny when they are below 45 kilo.
I would never call a girl skinny unless she is below 39 kilo. (depending on her length of course)

Thank fuck that’s not the case. They couldn’t be taller than 145cm without being medically underweight. Completely problematic definition.

[Iddaoeeok]

Nowadays girls might even be called skinny when they are below 45 kilo.
I would never call a girl skinny unless she is below 39 kilo. (depending on her length of course)

Thank fuck that’s not the case. They couldn’t be taller than 145cm without being medically underweight. Completely problematic definition.

I wouldn't use the word 'skinny' to describe most of the models on LP, I prefer the words 'slim' or 'slender' - to me, skinny means unusually or unattractively thin (and anorexic means unhealthily thin). There are some girls who I would describe as skinny on LP, and though it's nothing that I find attractive personally there are people out there who have a fetish for extremely thin women, much as some others have a fetish for overweight women - but that's what it is, a fetish. As I said though, most models on LP are slim but not skinny. Also the term 'curvy' is hopelessly vague, a lot of the girls grouped together as curvy on this forum have completely different body types.

[Object_O]

Nowadays girls might even be called skinny when they are below 45 kilo.
I would never call a girl skinny unless she is below 39 kilo. (depending on her length of course)

Thank fuck that’s not the case. They couldn’t be taller than 145cm without being medically underweight. Completely problematic definition.

I wouldn't use the word 'skinny' to describe most of the models on LP, I prefer the words 'slim' or 'slender' - to me, skinny means unusually or unattractively thin (and anorexic means unhealthily thin). There are some girls who I would describe as skinny on LP, and though it's nothing that I find attractive personally there are people out there who have a fetish for extremely thin women, much as some others have a fetish for overweight women - but that's what it is, a fetish. As I said though, most models on LP are slim but not skinny. Also the term 'curvy' is hopelessly vague, a lot of the girls grouped together as curvy on this forum have completely different body types.

This is not rocket science
The definition is very simple:
If the model's BMI is < 18.5 she is skinny if its > 24 she is overweight
Case closed

[Iddaoeeok]

This is not rocket science
The definition is very simple:
If the model's BMI is < 18.5 she is skinny if its > 24 she is overweight
Case closed

Well, LP doesn't give out BMI statistics for models so unless you have the ability to estimate BMI by sight then the case isn't closed.

[Jocke]

Hilarious thread!
Let's agree that we cannot agree on anything when it comes to the girls appearances. That is why we get diversity and that is great. Let's hope that everyones favourites are featured and that not some narrow minded definition of beauty is used!

[mydirtydigs151]

Because I'm too fucking old.
And the pretty girls I remember from my past were all natural.

Dig!
There is a big difference in emotional reaction from the 70's porn I was exposed to, compared to what high-def. images evoke of today.
The "tramp stamp" back in the day had more of bad/biker-girl symbolism, usually accompanied by the raunchy/harder sex acts that were rarer (Like DP) and a bald pussy had extra kink.

Having hair-down-there is not a turn-off for me per se. When I want to look at Hirsute or very-hairy beavers, I go to other places for that than here and usually translate better in still photos than motion anyway.
Even if an LP model has a full muff but is cropped down so I can see all the goods during the act, it's all good. I don't think it makes the pussy 'dirty' looking like to some. Yet again, I can understand how people don't like seeing hair.
However, I would think a guy who usually has hair, but is completely turned off by female hair: has a bald pussy fetish. And that can be taken by some...for just being into pubescent girls (which is totally untrue for the general population).
It's more about the aesthetics of the pussy itself for me. I may be totally enthralled with a model until I see her perineum area. Being stuffed up suddenly changes that though.
A less than good looking or attractive model to me, might just have a more aesthetically appealing vag/asshole, tits, body-type and form etc, so may be more of a turn on at that moment. It never really an issue for me though.
Many "ugly-ducklings" have made the best pornstars over the years, perhaps not in sales....but to in regards to their sexual performance and prowess and influence to the industry.
I mean come on...prolapsing isn't exactly, um... pretty .... but I like it see sometimes, for some reason. And not all girls look good (from personal perspective) doing it . If your just into prolapsing, it does not matter what the model looks like.
I would like to see all my favourite models naturally hairy as well, just to compare the difference..If you're someone like me who enjoys eating pussy, we're gonna have to accept that your woman may want to take a shaving break.
It is healthy for the porn industry to have hair come back as trend now and then. I treat it as being akin to the rare shave kitty from the 60/70's, pussy hair can be titillating in today's bald hair-phobic porn climate.

Tattoos and body mods that don't accentuate/seem-to-suit a model (according to the voyeur), can definitely take away from attraction and appeal depending on personal natural-tastes,. Some people have tattoo fetishes, so any kind of tattoo would be needed to get excited.
But if the scene provides a person with what they want and desire at the moment, the costuming tends to disappear.
Why bother watching a scene with Leigh Raven if her tongue is bothersome....It's not like the same sex act can't be found with the raunchier Bonnie Rotten...some are attracted to and prefer Leigh's body type vs. Bonnie's with them both being adorned with tats. Their mannerisms can make the difference regardless of appearance.
I personally could do without facial tats, but hey.....if the scene is hot, I can get past them....or I just won't be bothered with viewing it.
I can get past them on a female star, even if I don't find the tats particularly becoming on them. So I understand the lack of attraction they could create.
I personally can't 'relate' to and/or have difficulties putting myself in-the-shoes of certain male models: because of their kind/abundance of tattoos.
Tattoos aside, the 'best' female stars seem to enjoy fucking (personally) unattractive studs, as much as the aesthetically good-looking ones. Some cocks are not exactly pleasant to look at after all.
Which is at the end of the day...hopeful for the rest of us lol!

Skinny to me is: the slightly-underweight side of a slim/thin body type...Different than the 'skinny jeans' fashion.
But technically: voluptuous and/or bigger-boned woman can lose so much mass, that they can become skinny for their body type and they start to look unhealthy.
Obese used to be defined as 15lbs+ (as Object_O pointed out: body > fat ratio) and out of shape 30yrs ago, especially regarding people who naturally have fleshy/slower metabolism body types. Now obese is improperly used pop-culturally for the extreme side of fat.
Any woman who can handle putting on, or lose weight is my 'ideal' range. I'm guilty of the: I wish she was just a little fleshier, or less buxom.

Having flat-titties and undefined hips in-of-itself, does not translate into a female being pubescent and certainly not less feminine. Having enhanced breasts doesn't equate into womanly.
Not being attracted to 'formless' female model is completely understandable, but immediately viewing her as a boy instead is a completely different issue all together. I see vaginas as girls and penises as boys, regardless of how developed they are.
If an 18yr or older's, undefined female body is making a person think of little pubescent girls or boys, some soul searching needs to be had.
I'm not 20 any more....So ya, (especially in soft-core) there are female models that have developed bodies, but very young faces/eyes that can and should put me off, no more than an unrefined body with the same young face though....Isn't every model is supposed to be 18yr+ old regardless of how they appear?
There is of course a wide range of androgyny-like features. A female with a well defined 'womanly' body, can have masculine facial features and/or expressions that might set off the voyeur.
As a Canuck, it's not as if female, eastern-block Olympic athletes were the cream of the crop in comeliness or femininity 40 years ago. Things have changed quite drastically over a couple generations and Eurasia has 'softened' up drastically.
North-American females may be becoming less-comely or edgier to Europeans and eastern-block residents. But I think that is more due to differences in cultural bigotry and personality types portrayed, than appearance.
North Americans seem to appreciate Eurasians more than the other way around.

The 90's and 2000's may very well have been the 'best' of eras for porn (from across both oceans): This was the period that started to create standards of hardcore and pushed the envelope....but alas, no hi-definition..and those old scenes regardless of how exciting, stimulating and still up-to-date according to today's sexual content standards...are obviouly visually lacking something now.
I wish I could view my favourite 70/80's old-school Swedish Erotica/Euro-raunch DP scene in Hi-def!
Hi-definition porn influences the fashion world, more than the fashion world influences porn. and now we can see every 'flaw' if it's not hidden under make-up effects. I think those covered up idiosyncrasies can sometimes add greatly to the model if left unmasked.
Bad make-up is just bad make-up no matter what. It should subtly highlight features not cover up. If it doesn't suit her, it's been done poorly, regardless of how extreme or subtle it is. Most of the exceptional models, don't need make-up at all
We are seeing the next evolution to detail and visual stimulation.

Scenes that are white-washed and/or poorly filmed and/or have clicky noises (Made from shirt-buttons or wrist-ware?) and/or lackluster energy, can make flixxx less than what they could have been; regardless of one's attraction to the model and/or how amazing the sex acts performed may or may not be.
That's no different from any media format; When I watch hard-core, I want my sensations to be almost intensely-overwhelmed. I want to immerse myself in the moment like I'm filming and/or performing in it myself. I want clarity and definition.
I personally think that the image quality of the recent Mr. Anderson's/Georgio's Labs and the AmericanAnal vids is what LP should be striving for, that's the direction porn is going.
They vastly improve the visual side of things, presenting an improved/more realistic contrast and the clarity is night and day, almost making the other scenes not filmed like that at LP, seeming to be like the old films of yesteryear in overall visual experience; they just happen to be 'hi-def' and 16:9.
Often it isn't the model or sex scene, it's what has become a less-than-par visual experience as a whole....because we been spoiled and have glimpsed the evolution of visual stimulation. The sooner LP accommodates that visual platform and quality as a whole, the more lucrative it would be by catering to a broader audience.
Don't get me wrong, an amazingly performed scene that is captured, is still amazing regardless, but that's not what I'm referring to. AmericaAnal has added to LP as a leader in visual photo quality to the site. Take heed and progress.
I'd outfit all the pornographers with new gear if I could afford it myself.

Regardless of what turns me on, I'd rather see John Strong's avg-sized hard-on preforming well like he tends to do with some gusto, than a not-quite-fully-erect monster of a cock that struggles to stay hard...only penetrating a little and hardly thrusting, therefore wasting it's visual potential.
I can watch large toy porn if it was just about seeing a butthole or Vag stretched to it's limits. I can only truly be completely turned on with the big guns, if the female can handle them with relative ease and the guys aren't struggling to stay hard.
More and more these days, the videos seem to slip into the homo-erotic-gangbang-dick-fetish territory and less about the woman.
If a model is more comfortable with smaller dicks and therefore ... can handle deeper penetration (even while totally airtight) which then leads to a more intense scene and I assume...all around pleasure for the female ... that's who she should be working with in general.
When a woman can comfortably take a deeper penetrating fuck, even it isn't the most animalistic...it translates to relating to her pleasure and intimacy....that simply is a better quality scene;
If I was to share my wife in a gangbang, it's not because I want to see tip-fucking or lackluster efforts from the guys. Don't pound into her like you couldn't give a shit about her cervix and don't rip her open...but keep it steady and fuck her, give her time to feel something deeper than just being penetrated.
When the guys and girls need a break, keep it slow but steady...you got at least 4-6 inches on avg. of vaginal depth to work with....fucking use it!

I also don't think people need to read "Monster Cock" consistently in a titles at LP, when most of the male Models are already bigger than the rest of us here I'm-sure. But is it really a monster if it isn't full on rock hard? They are only the big dicks of the already well-endowed LP crew in relativity.
Viewing women struggling to endure the acts in her scene with obvious and overly, prolonged and/or overwhelming discomfort (and we do this see here frequently) to the point that she is just a woman there....as if any woman would do.... as long as she looked relatively appealing.
and then being turned on by said examples, is not really viewing porn for the sex, most definitely not for the beauty and excitement of female pleasure. It's more on the domination and homo-erotic side of perverseness. Which is cool for some, but not the general population who delves into the darker side of porn.
I don't mind that myself sometimes, I suppose......I do after all want to be comfortable naked around other men and not feel judged as well.
However, stars like Anna de Ville not only obviously can take it, but also seems to enjoy being able to handle it.
Even if she's just 'laying there' plugged up and being used...shes more involved somehow, more than gaping holes and the pistons deeply penetrating her.
Being outnumbered and overwhelmed doesn't freeze her up like so many others. Her pleasure or want of it, appears to be involved as well. That's what truly makes or breaks a scene.

The women in the older Sinplex movies generally didn't seem to be as stressed in their scenes, as with the females that come and go through today's LP format. Whether it was double-anally plugged, Classic Dped, taking it in the ass or just simply in the Vag, they still seemed more involved instead of just a piece in the scene.
More than two or three guys and the scene starts to stop being about the woman. She starts to have to focus more on everything else and less upon herself letting go. That doesn't mean that some gangbangs aren't great mind you.
Girls who can take it hard and deep (especially in the ass) are the monster cock girls....there's no need to advertise the men as such.

This comes from 70/80's Hall of Famer: Sharon Mitchell ... to paraphrase:
There is a distinct difference, which often translates on screen between a female star who is just doing it for the money and/or experience, and one who does sex-work for the sheer enjoyment and pleasure of it. The exceptional do it because of the later with all the benefits of the former.
In other-words....The superstars and sometimes even the one-hit-wonder gems do and express more than just being able to take it.

People aren't any better at fucking now than they were 30yrs ago, the films aren't any harder in nature, it's all been done now...but women ARE opening up to be more sexually expressive when it comes to their own pleasure and skills.
I think LP can do better and be improved with less dickcentric focus and shift to allowing their women to let loose with their sexual prowess in those regards, especially when it comes to the Noobies.
Still mix it up, but with fewer outrageous gangbangs, less DAPs unless the model can properly handle it, more classic 2on1 & 2on2 DPs and relatively frequent 1on1/ FFM like retro Sineplex's highly successful genre used to be.
And more rev/cowgirl, with the models off their knees, squatting down, in control, working that cock for as long as they can. That's what the monster cock is really only useful for.

Dimming the lights and using spots in a white room may improve contrast, but I think the general consensus is: to improve video quality, that can go a long way to begin with.


But to say the girls are getting worse....I think not.

.

[Lanos]

That is why we get diversity and that is great.

I see no real diversity. I just see an insane amount of skinny, flat girls....talking about Studio GG.

[zigzg009]

Hilarious thread!
Let's agree that we cannot agree on anything when it comes to the girls appearances. That is why we get diversity and that is great. Let's hope that everyones favourites are featured and that not some narrow minded definition of beauty is used!

Well said and something that needs to be remembered when posting about appearances.

[zigzg009]

That is why we get diversity and that is great.

I see no real diversity. I just see an insane amount of skinny, flat girls....talking about Studio GG.

I won't say the models are getting worse, as the thread suggests, but agree with you about the lack of diversity. Many others have shared similar thoughts. LP appears to be sticking to its 'business model' and the input on the need for diversity goes ignored or we are told they don't sell. I have started advising myself when it comes to spending here and will support diverse and also curvy models.

[Jocke]

I have started advising myself when it comes to spending here and will support diverse and also curvy models.

That is the way! We vote with our Euros, not with repeated complaints on the forum. There are thousands of LP customers and only a hundred have ever posted on the forum. DAP addict has 6% of the posts. How representative are we here?

If you don't get what you want you can be sure that you are in a minority and regardless of how much you complain, there will be no change unless people start to buy those scenes you want.

Then I think we should come with suggestions for things to test and LP should experiment. You cannot know what will sell unless you have tried!

[avanfurwet]

That is the way! We vote with our Euros, not with repeated complaints on the forum. There are thousands of LP customers and only a hundred have ever posted on the forum. DAP addict has 6% of the posts. How representative are we here?

If you don't get what you want you can be sure that you are in a minority and regardless of how much you complain, there will be no change unless people start to buy those scenes you want.

Then I think we should come with suggestions for things to test and LP should experiment. You cannot know what will sell unless you have tried!

I agree.

Screenshot_2020-01-07_19-42-12.png (18.11 KiB) Viewed 8934 times

Does anyone use the "SUGGEST" function to make requests and upvote/downvote requests?
Does LP look at these at all?
Seriously, I didn't even know the facility was there, despite it appearing in capital letters at the top of the front screen. Must have been distracted ...
Also, is this facility even in Pornbox?

[zigzg009]

Screenshot_2020-01-07_19-42-12.png

Does anyone use the "SUGGEST" function to make requests and upvote/downvote requests?
Does LP look at these at all?
Seriously, I didn't even know the facility was there, despite it appearing in capital letters at the top of the front screen. Must have been distracted ...
Also, is this facility even in Pornbox?[/quote]

Thanks for pointing this out. I must have missed it all this time and don't see it on PBox. It appears some have used it to make suggestions with most expiring after the 60 days with no votes. To your question, and even if there were votes, I don't know if LP looks or how important it is to them. I believe there would be more promotion and visibility if it were with the ideas being posted on forums redirected to the suggestion area. I wasn't aware of all the expired and still open suggestions there until you pointed it out and i went looking. I see more suggestions on the different LP forums than i see complaints. For now, I will sit back and continue to vote with my euro.

[avanfurwet]

^ I don't know either.

If I click on a thumbs up it turns green, and thumbs down turns red, which is nice.

I have no idea if my vote has been registered anywhere, or how many votes for or against were registered by anyone else.
Maybe it's just a front screen with nothing behind it?

It's like they started to implement a nice feature, And didn't finish it. Oh well.

So we're back to voting with our tickets for content which is already made. So they'll make more of the same.

And posting our ideas/complaints/bullshit all over the jungles of the forum.

[Mizar5]

The problem is that there are a lot of us who find tattoos unattractive and won't purchase a scene in which the model is covered with them. While there are a ton of people who either love or do not care one way or the other, they still purchase scenes with people who do not have tattoos. The current fashion makes it difficult to find models without tattoos who will act in hardcore scenes.

Over time I've become a bit more accepting of tattoos. Or desensitised.

Previously I was phobic about anything more than a cute little drawing on her shoulder, hip or rump.
Now I'm a bit less picky, which is just as well because tattoos are in fashion and that's that.

But I still can't see past today's huge multi-coloured tattoos where a girl turns herself into a walking mural.
And I can't cope at all with split tongues, elongated earlobes, extensive piercings, facial tattoos, etc.

Because I'm too fucking old.
And the pretty girls I remember from my past were all natural.

You and I are of similar mind and experience on that, avanfurwet. Too bad tattoos are becoming increasingly unavoidable. In the "old" days, and that can't be more than 20 years ago, the only people I ran across who wore tattoos were gang members, drug addicts and washed-out sailors.

Anyway, a girl with zero tattoos always gets a second look from me. And there are SOME exceptions to my no-tattoo rule. The girl has to be special. The shine from her eyes, smile, or other physical attributes supercedes the chicken scrawl on her body. There are a few like that here on LP. Charlotte Sartre comes to mind. But she's not the only one.

Dark-skinned girls can pull off tattoos better IMO, as long as the markings aren't multicolored.