marcoB wrote:experienced - instead of young and innocent? This is how i perceive it. Is this intended?
I have attached a picture from Linda Sweet's [spam] account for example. From everyday life. here she looks like an innocent 19yo girl next door. In LP scenes (even in her much older ones) she looks like 25-28 and experienced/like a pro (in other words: boring for me).
Same for sure with other girls. What i like about porn is when i can imagine the girl i see there could be my neighbor - but get's a DP. But a ton of makeup, dress overkill etc destroys this illusion totally.
When a girl looks like a porn barbie that is doing porn, it's just boring because it lacks contract and is totally predictable. It's what you expect...
So you have been on Lindas [spam] account I see....
Have you ever seen her without makeup dude? Like zero makeup?
If you had you wouldn't be saying what your saying....
Linda has freckles like crazy! Not just her face but shoulders/upper body.
No way any porn studio would of shot her like that....
Not trying to be a dick here just stating the facts...
I loved Linda back in the day and think she was one of the most beautiful performers to ever work on here....
But she was ALWAYS cached in makeup.... HEAVILY in makeup.
So yes women SHOULD always have makeup on...They are producing a product to sell and should look at their best PERIOD!
Is their such thing as to much makeup? Sure
But to say you want raw....Trust me you dont want raw
