an12726 wrote:Yesterday Polly Pons, now Jolee Love.
This mania to hide girls’ feet with ugly shoes, it becomes ridiculous...
Barefoot please!
Didn't use tkt for this, of course.
Vaughn99 wrote:I don’t agree. I love those sexy highheels. Please more of that! Maybe u could cusomise the scenes to barefeet and higheels version like u do with pee and anal.
Dudemeister wrote:No need to respond to an12726 anyway, this dude is just trolling the forum with always the same complaints about "horrible shoes", "ridiculous shoes", "ugly shoes". What the heck is wrong with this guy?
And now back to topic, this is about gorgeous Jolee
Dudemeister wrote:No need to respond to an12726 anyway, this dude is just trolling the forum with always the same complaints about "horrible shoes", "ridiculous shoes", "ugly shoes". What the heck is wrong with this guy?
Wotan29 wrote:Agree with jackthetreacleeater and dap-addict. Jolee´s last scene was not rough and was no manhandling. It was just a normal scene with some silly lame throatgrabbing. If manhandling is in the title I want to see manhandling! Otherwise don´t name the scene like this.
That´s manhandling:
Slapping, choking, spitting, hairpulling, titgrabbing, throwing into fuck positions, tossing the girl around, facefucking, fisting, forced kissing, biting lips tits and pussy, tied up, fixed hands, foot on head, head or fist in mouth, outfit thrown over head and pissed on, verbal degrading, cum and piss in open eyes, head dunked in toilet and stuff like that. Yeah, some girls are into this - believe it or not. And only with those girls manhandling scenes should be shot. To all the guys who don´t want to see this: Simply don´t watch it and don´t complain.
For all the other perverted guys like me probably this poll/thread should be revived. Take a look and lobby it:
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=18759&hilit=make+manhandling+great+again
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Totally disagree,
manhandle means treating a girl roughly, this has nothing to do with being violent or degrade / humiliate a girl.
Said that, with all respect, is the model that decide her limit in such scenes. (...) in effect the most does it because she feels save in the environment and she likes the payout, but she is happy when the scene in concluded.
Manhandle needs to stay inside the "comfort" line of the model, not in the wish "area" of the users.
jackthetreacleeater wrote:Come on dap-addict, you don't always have to be a brown-noser to the directors and talent
Yes, yes, we all agree that girls should not be forced or coerced into doing anything they don't want to do in porn, and quite frankly I don't think any girl ever has in all the porn I've watched from mainstream studios and producers; including LP.
But the point is, which Mr. GG seems to miss himself, is that there are certain expectations when a scene is labelled "man-handle." I do not see the point in hiring a girl to do a man-handle or rough scene if they're not interested in doing that or it does not turn them on. I do not want to see a girl get slapped about if she's not into it. However if you're going to market a scene as rough or man-handling and the girl isn't into it, what's the point? Just hire them to shoot a more conventional scene.
ianjelakh wrote:no nun costume please
ianjelakh wrote:no nun costume please
RedBaron wrote:Do you have more wet scenes with her? Really loved the one.
Mikesticha30 wrote:One of the prettiest faces to bless porn!
ultimate_sperminator61 wrote:hopefully some day a special bukkake is possible for amazing Jolee.
Users browsing this forum: Hellfire13, Legasus96, TomHardick and 113 guests