What is missing for a really good & useful tag system?

Currently we have these tags:
Which ones could be deleted?
And which ones need to be added?
analsexonly wrote:A vaginal tag for all scenes including vaginal penetration.
And then, the ability to exclude that tag from searches.
dap-addict wrote:
Specify please!
triple penetration (TP) - DAP+pussy or DPP+anal?
dap-addict wrote:
heels vs. barefoot vs. mixed (half-half about)
misangrenegra2 wrote:"Series name" (a filter to search every scene of a particular serie) eg. Waka Waka series or DAP destination.
paobroncix01 wrote:I know for example that there are quite a number of DPP scenes which are not tagged as DPP.
analsexonly wrote:A vaginal tag for all scenes including vaginal penetration.
And then, the ability to exclude that tag from searches.
dap-addict wrote:There is no vaginal sex tag because LP was born as an anal porn sex site.
Vaginal is no option sb at LP would have imagines ppl want to search for.
And obviously nobody thought of the exclusion option.![]()
They should have a look at the IAFD search engine for instance, not take IAFD as a reference really as it is pretty shit for Eurobabes, but search options are ok.
ffc2001 wrote:
The tag system in these reference images might not contain your particular fetish. That's not why I'm showing it really. It's more to illustrate a different kind of system. Here we have sort of MASTER HEADINGS and there are various options under each one. This is good because you can see at a glance all the things you want. It's more precise.
e.g.
Sex: anal, vaginal
Position: doggystyle regular, reverse cowgirl, standing
The issue seems to be also that the data entry is maybe being rushed. Yes, it's a boring job but from a customer standpoint - it makes quite a difference. It wouldn't matter as much in a non-ticket based system. You'd be like..."Damn! I spent 30mins downloading this video and its riddled with DP...oh well, I'll just download a different one". In a ticket based system you rely on tags - because your tickets are essentially money. So when the tags lead you somewhere you didn't want to go...you feel mislead. On the other hand, opportunity is being missed here. For example; I love NO PUSSY, STANDING POSITION and ATM (among other things); if there are videos in the archives that have these tags then I'd likely buy them all...then I would run out of tickets, and then I would most likely buy more tickets.
DapperDapFan wrote:They just need to make it easier to search by multiple tags at the same time
dap-addict wrote:DapperDapFan wrote:They just need to make it easier to search by multiple tags at the same time
You can easily search by multiple tags at the same time, just tick the boxes.
DapperDapFan wrote:incidentally, the tag system I see is inclusive, not exclusive. I dont want to tick 1v1 and anal and see all 1v1 scenes and all anal scenes, which is how it works for me. I want to see all the scenes that are both 1v1 and anal, not either or.
dap-addict wrote:Lets assume LP would like to create an updated tag system.
What is missing for a really good & useful tag system?
![]()
Currently we have these tags:
Which ones could be deleted?
And which ones need to be added?
dap-addict wrote:For me:
Delete!
I think hair color is changing often anyway, thus blonde, brunette, black could be deleted. Leave/add natural "redhead", though.
deepthroat - most times sort of given anyway
first time - too fussy to establish, and LP numeration shows anyway which scenes was shot first on LP
huge toys - most times given anyway
rough - used too often, better define it clearly and replace by "manhandle"
sex toy - is always there
Personally I dont need these genre infos, but I realize others might need them still - although often it seems pretty old fetishes:
airtight
ass licking
ATM
ATOGM
ATP
ATOGP
butt plugs
Specify please!
triple penetration (TP) - DAP+pussy or DPP+anal?
3+ on1 - better just 4on1, 5on1, 6on1, 7on1 etc.
Genres missing in my book:
manhandle
prone bone
story based
heels vs. barefoot vs. mixed (half-hale about)
So much for me.![]()
How do others see that?
Please remember that tagging is time consuming process thus better in the end we have a working body of 30-50 pages than a non-working of 100-150 tags. Currently there are 44 different tags and tagging far from accurate sadly.![]()
dap-addict wrote:Lets assume LP would like to create an updated tag system.
What is missing for a really good & useful tag system?
![]()
Currently we have these tags:
Which ones could be deleted?
And which ones need to be added?
Users browsing this forum: Latinloverf1 and 49 guests