utopiaa wrote:Or indeed as the poster above said have some kinda limit on the reload that you can only do it when you are under certain ticket amount. That way you don't have people buying membership and reloading 1000 tickets and cancel ( not sure if that even happens thought)
I get the feeling i must have misunderstood xxx and must be really fucking stupid and missing something.
As it stands i just don't see his concern with someone joining, reloading several times and then cancelling a recurring membership whilst sat on a big wad of tickets.
It seems to me that the scenario (the he fears) would run that a person buys a 3-monther and then reloads twice, for example, and cancels(sat on 360 tickets). Given that you can easily spend 100+ tickets a months (and if the tickets are there in your account you are way more likely to impulse spend them) that by the end of that three month run you are pretty much going to have spent up. At that point, assuming you enjoyed the content (and if you aren't you'd be cancelling any membership you still did have) you will be tempted to rejoin (especially as you are now reassured that cancellation is painless).
So now the mastermind scheme is to make reloads look prohibitively expensive to dissuade people from reloading, lest they then cancel. So now, after three months, the customer will have spent only 40 tickets per month and spent about 1/3 of what they would have done (unless they can be bothered to actually run multiple memberships which, let us be honest, virtually no-one will). It is almost as if they are trying to stop us spending too much on porn!!!
Obviously. all of that makes so little sense that I realise there must be some elephant in the room here that we are blind to.
Funny thing is, their arch-enemy Pierre Woodman, much as i dislike the guy, gets this spot-on with his site, rewarding members in a structured and logical way:
http://www.woodmanforum.com/with-pierre ... tml#p86114