Pissing wrote:Yeah, Gina Gerson is beautiful. She is skinny, I wish LP had some more girls who are also skinny.
Pissing wrote:Yeah, Gina Gerson is beautiful. She is skinny, I wish LP had some more girls who are also skinny.
SEMU wrote:http://legalporno.com/watch/28334/3_on_ ... tion_sz492
WAW WAW WAW!!!What an Amazing Scene!!!
After the 7on1 humiliattion do brazil now its the Gina Gerson's awesome girl 3on1 humiliation for us
My wich has been ganted =======>>>>>>AMAZING girl+greats gapes+hard anal with many dicks...
Thank you very much LP I will buy it NOOOOOW
angelnomiluvr wrote:I'm surprised at how many guys put looks aside for a girl who does whatever they think is nasty enough. It's like if she's nasty enough, then who cares what she looks like at times.
evil-pineapples wrote:I think he's implying that Gina is not attractive.
Attractiveness is subjective. I think she's pretty cute, personally.
angelnomiluvr wrote:That was the point, simply, does anyone give a different standard when it comes to girls in porn? At least according to the measurements of the features, some of the girls here are not "scientifically" more than a 7 out of 10, at most.
angelnomiluvr wrote:I'm just wondering if the site here is really full of that many of the 20% of the population, or if guys are putting aside standards so they will take girls who are say a 6 out of 10, just because of what she does in the scenes.
I don't see a lot of calls for girls that I think are SUPER hot, like 9 out of 10, and very rare in the industry in that sense. I see more for girls that do the larger gapes, or the tap, or whatever it is, even if they are not picnic on the eyes.
That was the point, simply, does anyone give a different standard when it comes to girls in porn? At least according to the measurements of the features, some of the girls here are not "scientifically" more than a 7 out of 10, at most.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:angelnomiluvr wrote:I'm just wondering if the site here is really full of that many of the 20% of the population, or if guys are putting aside standards so they will take girls who are say a 6 out of 10, just because of what she does in the scenes.
I don't see a lot of calls for girls that I think are SUPER hot, like 9 out of 10, and very rare in the industry in that sense. I see more for girls that do the larger gapes, or the tap, or whatever it is, even if they are not picnic on the eyes.
That was the point, simply, does anyone give a different standard when it comes to girls in porn? At least according to the measurements of the features, some of the girls here are not "scientifically" more than a 7 out of 10, at most.
Well, I have said many times that for me, the appeal of LP (and other similar sites) is not that they shoot a certain type of girl, but that they shoot a certain type of sex.
In other words, performance trumps looks every time. Of course, a girl needs a certain minimum in the looks department, but as long as she has that (i.e. as long as she's "fuckable"), then performance is all that really matters.
I'll take a girl who is just decent looking, but eagerly does whatever nasty stuff that is asked of her, over a girl who is drop dead gorgeous, but doesn't want to do anything but plain old vanilla sex, any day of the week.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], harlequinman, ptf75250 and 97 guests