Giorgio Grandi wrote:This girl has potential also if her anal skills need to improve a lot, really a lot. She is into porn and this good, but she needs to grow up in her performance. I shot another scene in combo with Dominica Phoenix and she did much better, I will release that scene pretty soon. I plan other scenes with her, but if I dont see a drastic increase in her performance I wont consider this girl as a model who deserves to get regular releases.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Sadly I think the point is about the performance and the management of the model, this is a general "issue" in the industry.
We need to be realistic (not like someone wrote on EBI recently), porn has we known 10 years ago doesnt exist anymore. A good model from est Europe is lucky to been shot 2 time/year in average from each existing European production, I mean a good looking girl, performing "normal" and without good anal skills.
On the other hand, if the aforementioned model has good anal skills, she gets also 20 scene/year from LP and is very possible that only with the 20 scenes on LP she gains more money then in the aforementioned condition. Indeed the aforementioned model with very good anal skills would gain something like 3 time more just the first year and 6-8 time more if you evaluate a 3 years career.
Lizarbian wrote:U guys rules this business, but i dont agree with that. Miss a potential talent because she did not do DAP in the first scenes? Judging for this reason, we would never have Goldie, one of the best models the site had.
dap-addict wrote:Nice numbers, but why does she double/triple her income year 2 and 3 with LP?
Also, is a 3 year porn career really realistic nowadays?
My impression is 2 years is fine, but we see it with Crystal Greenville, sadly her star is sinking towards the end of her 2nd term. Just one example, others fade somehow, too.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I want to add a note about the topics on forums in general: really, sometimes people write that LP is extreme because of DAP, but to drink 2lt of piss at GGG or VP or a 200g of sperm at PB or get fucked from a grandpa or drink 1lt of vodka and after masturbate in your own pure is not really soft porn. I personally consider it more extreme/degrading then get 2 dicks in the ass. LP has been mistreated from people "ill-informed" and many forums allowed several user to write lies (or to report lies they had read on other forums) systematically, without to "moderate" as they should.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Because while she is a regular model at LP and she gets scenes constantly for 3/4 years, after 6-8 months in the industry (already in the first year) her "soft" job for other company is minimal. So if you count what she gets in total (3 years) from other company and what she gets in total from LP, the gap is ugedap-addict wrote:Nice numbers, but why does she double/triple her income year 2 and 3 with LP?
Also, is a 3 year porn career really realistic nowadays?
My impression is 2 years is fine, but we see it with Crystal Greenville, sadly her star is sinking towards the end of her 2nd term. Just one example, others fade somehow, too.
magizi87 wrote:Another thing I want to talk about is positioning. Too often the actors and the model
position themselves in ways that make the sex less comfortable and harder to do,
from putting the girl too close to objects that obstruct how the men can approach and penetrate her,
to how the model positions her body and make her holes easier or harder for the men around her to reach.
For example, Giorgio criticized Nicole Black, for being "not very good" at performing,
But when looking at her performance, I was like "What else do you want Giorgio?"
Balls deep anal, her legs twitching
Squeezing that cock
So I started thinking, what did Giorgio see that he didn't like about her.
And I thought, normally I like doing gifs about girls DP airtight in doggy.
But I didn't do any gif about her scene in that position, went back and rewatched the scene,
and I didn't do any gifs because the penetration was ultra lame:
But IMO, the problem was not that she was unwilling to do the position, or that she couldn't get fucked nicely,
the problem was simply how she was positioned on that bench. If instead, her knees where placed perpendicular to the bench situated at the edge and her knees were bent in 90 degrees or greater,
it would have been a lot easier
at the edge of the bench, it would have been a lot easier for Neo, the guy fucking her pussy, to get closer
and actually, do the penetration.
Because if you think about it, if her legs are as bend as they are,
her asshole is angled further down and the guy squatting on top of her has to push his ass
further into the guy who is gonna fuck her pussy, which is awkward.
To illustrate, this is Veronica Clark, so talented at bending her legs, just right,
so that 3 guys can easily fuck her during doggy. (sarcasm)
By the way, I love how her elbows are resting on the couch, positioning like that
makes her ass go up and that makes her look extra "sexual" and beautiful.
And because she is grabbing Mike by the balls instead of the cock, is that much better looking.
I think it should be crystal clear that how the model is positioned, makes all the difference!
I do want to include that oral sex, is also very important during gangbang movies.
And the model should always try her best at also doing "good form".
She is so freaking perfect for pornos.
Balls deep anal and vaginal?
Balls deep oral capabilities?
Does she have a nice ass?
Ultra pretty?
She pretty much passes every test with flying colors. Every studio should get a piece of the pie
nyre79 wrote:alblue wrote:What a beautiful young whore. I look forward to many scenes with this sultry slut being gangbanged hard by the biggest cocks, her holes used and stretched like the pretty little bitch she is. I would welcome a 10 or 15 man bukkake scene with piss drinking.
DAMN! PLEASE MAKE THAT HAPPEN GIORGIO
simone.urbinati wrote:no news?
Chi_Cha wrote:i think she's really nasty and she'll want to improve her anal skills.
dap-addict wrote:...Nicole Black so far has chosen LP, though.
simone.urbinati wrote:i hope many more scenes with Nicole.
7on1 will be epic
and i hope she will work with LP
teschio wrote:simone.urbinati wrote:i hope many more scenes with Nicole.
7on1 will be epic
and i hope she will work with LP
I AGREE 100% !!!!!!!!
simone.urbinati wrote:No news about Nicole??
Sweep11 wrote:What are you talking about?!
If this beautiful, sexy, talented and ambitious girl can't take 2 cocks in the ass at the same time comfortably, then she has no place at LP? Is that seriously what you're suggesting? When did you get to decide these things? This is an anal focused site, sure. Does it mean it should be double anal or nothing? Hell no.
xxx wrote:Sweep11 wrote:What are you talking about?!
If this beautiful, sexy, talented and ambitious girl can't take 2 cocks in the ass at the same time comfortably, then she has no place at LP? Is that seriously what you're suggesting? When did you get to decide these things? This is an anal focused site, sure. Does it mean it should be double anal or nothing? Hell no.
Couldn't agree more.
Sweep11 wrote:What are you talking about?!
If this beautiful, sexy, talented and ambitious girl can't take 2 cocks in the ass at the same time comfortably, then she has no place at LP? Is that seriously what you're suggesting? When did you get to decide these things? This is an anal focused site, sure. Does it mean it should be double anal or nothing? Hell no.
dap-addict wrote:;)
Of course there are exceptions.
See Gina Gerson, Goldie and many more.
Still, just keep in mind the monthly sales statistics, they show a lot!
Giorgio Grandi wrote:She needs more time and that's it. Anal/dp/dap, I do not see much difference between. Problem is that she is not enough "anal friendly" yet even for a good anal session. We will see in the next weeks what she will develop, it could take longer then usual to get a consistent anal session, but she is willing to grow, so it's maybe just a matter of time
Users browsing this forum: headhunter7xxx, KZPTS and 84 guests