kidloco2 wrote:I'm absolutely sure LP scenes (at least two main studios Gonzo and GG) could be produced cheaper, but they probably don't have to be.
Both studios (esp. Gonzo) have grown into big porn facilities and I can imagine many ppl's lives rely solely or mostly on its scenes' revenue.
To be honest LP prices went quite high lately for various reasons which I don't want to talk about here and I understand that in many viewers' eyes higher price doesn't make up for the increased scene production value. While mostly most expensive, IMHO the best value still has Giorgio.
I understand when xxx says he's not happy with the amount you can get for the money. I think we need at least one small studio that will produce
cheaper scenes on a daily basis. I don't agree with an argument of some posters that they will be necessary lower quality. What would make them lower quality? Actors? No - they will be the same without any expensive trial / error experimentation. Sex? No. DAP/DP/Gapes included. Image quality? Hell no, comm'on, you will surprised how cheap some porn producers' rigs are.
Last note on EA/ LP IQ comparison. I agree / disagree. If you can't see the difference between Gonzo and GG studio IQ then you probably is not
able to distinct between EA and LP IQ. There's like one digit difference. GG's camera is no doubt a serious professional beast, IMHO unfortunately the lens are the weakest point. But still has enough resolution to make you cry even in 4k, not talking about 1080p at all, which is razor still-image-like sharp.
You constantly try to prove us that making porn is so cheap, so maybe try yourself? Just try to talk with xxx, make agreement and just start producing this chep awesome and good quality videos.
Ok I will try to understand your point of view. You want use the same models, I suppose TOP stars so you will not save money here because rate for DAP gangbang will be the same, male talents also should be good without wood issues etc, again you will not save money. Next point - camera, it also has to be good to provide quality, it will not be cheap so anyway it will consume couple thousands of euro, maybe even more. Important is also location, the best some nice place with good lights and infrastructure like showers etc, maybe some kind of waiting room etc where models could wait for shooting in human conditions. You have place you have to pay taxes, bills for water, light, heating, cleaning etc.
The only matter when $$ could be save are: location (you can rent something cheap without extra equipment, less comfortable for working for models and director), post recording editing - hire some skilled student of IT and pay him couple of bucks, models - forget about known actresses with big names and try to find some good newbies, they will be cheaper but of course it will require a lot work with scouting and at the end you can't be sure of results.
Anyway this 40% you mentioned earlier is completely balooney.