Not enough studs in scene... are we calling that gangbang ?

[French-Touch]

Subject speak for himself. Imo there are not enough studs in scene, Giorgio has used to make scene with, 80% of the time... 4 studs for dap destination, which is a beginning scene for a model and she never perform dap destination again and explore big gangbang like 6on1 ( imo the best compromise) 7on1 and sometimes more (rebel 14on1 scene, veronica leal 12on1, anna de ville birthday scene with 25 guys).

Gangbang are the best of LP and the best of giorgio grandi production, it's not good to reduce to 2on1 3on1 this is not gangbang.

I could understand 5on1 but... don't think it's good for the studio. we can clearly see a big difference before and after when giorgio gone.

[Antiquarian]

Subject speak for himself. Imo there are not enough studs in scene, Giorgio has used to make scene with, 80% of the time... 4 studs for dap destination, which is a beginning scene for a model and she never perform dap destination again and explore big gangbang like 6on1 ( imo the best compromise) 7on1 and sometimes more (rebel 14on1 scene, veronica leal 12on1, anna de ville birthday scene with 25 guys).

Gangbang are the best of LP and the best of giorgio grandi production, it's not good to reduce to 2on1 3on1 this is not gangbang.

I could understand 5on1 but... don't think it's good for the studio. we can clearly see a big difference before and after when giorgio gone.

There is no point in amassing dudes in a scene, if you don't actually know how to use them.

[omgbbq262]

Maybe 2 or 3 isn't 'enough' but I've also watched enough scenes with more than 10 guys where many of them barely fuck and spend most of the time jerking their cocks trying to stay hard. imo either they need to fuck an adequate amount of time of they're pretty much wasted in the scene.

[misangrenegra2]

10 men or more are too much in my opinion, can give you a good ending options as massive facials/swallows/ creampies, but at the time of use them you will have a over exposure of guys in the sceneario, on they are jerking off and some of them will not have the proper time of performance, there are guys who fuck more than others and you will see more switching/pause.

For some scenes is fine, but the perfect number to have a good balance is between 5 and 7, even 8, that should be called a gangbang. 4 men are good for new girls and a minimum required for experienced ones, 2on1 is a threesome and 3on1 is a mini gangbang.

Definetly i love the gangbangs of this studio and i'll hope they keep doing the great job they do.

[omgbbq262]

10 men or more are too much in my opinion, can give you a good ending options as massive facials/swallows/ creampies, but at the time of use them you will have a over exposure of guys in the sceneario, on they are jerking off and some of them will not have the proper time of performance, there are guys who fuck more than others and you will see more switching/pause.

For some scenes is fine, but the perfect number to have a good balance is between 5 and 7, even 8, that should be called a gangbang.

Yes, that's the problem I've seen before. There should be a balance so there is adequate time for the different guys to fuck. Not much need for many guys if not used properly.

[BLACK_MANE]

I would say at least 5 guys is fine with me. As fun as 12
Is the majority of the time the other guys aren’t doing anything. If they did a bdsm gangbang it would make sense for the humiliation factor.

[hyapet]

Three (actually) talented studs is all you really need or want in a scene. Three is the magic number.

If you absolutely need more - then 5 is the next (but final) step. And even then, it's really hard for the guys to coordinate effectively, not just because of their number, but because of what the act itself requires and how they need to participate.

There is nothing worse than watching a bunch of dudes standing around and jerking off. It's like - fuck off with that shit. Whenever I see that - regardless of the homosexual overtones (which I am also not a fan of) - it's a betrayal of the purpose and the energy of the scene.

You want to see a girl getting fucked raw. You don't want to see a bunch of dudes lining up, standing still, and looking like they're waiting for the bus with (literally) their dicks in their hand. It kills the momentum. It kills the energy. It kills the kinetic vicious action of the scene where there's a whole bunch of dudes driving to the net constantly and consistently. Yeah - watching guys just standing there - or trying to find a more comfortable spot on the couch - or ... yawn ... going from around back of the couch, to just slightly in front of it ... isn't what I think when I think "gangbang."

You want a porn shoot to be like a fantasy. You don't want shit to reflect reality. You don't want to see guys fumbling around, or moving their knee a bit to the left on the couch, gotta get that perfect angle ... nope, a bit more, alright, reposition again ... and ...

The reason they're acting so fucking lame is because the energy they themselves are experiencing is just standing around. It's kind of hard to ask somebody to jump off a cliff after they've been standing around for fifteen minutes. And this milling-about waiting-for-the-shift-to-end energy infects the rest of the scene, until everybody goes from playing a game of musical chairs (the energy it should have) to a sad and listless game of pin the tail on the donkey.

Nope ... not there ... almost ... oopff ... just a touch to the left, nope ... not there either ... and it's like fuck!

Five is the absolute max. And even that is super difficult. But it prevents overcrowding - and everyone can expect to get some action, even if it's the girl who's rubbing them off, at the same time. The minute you have any more than that - then - no.

NRX and Nick Whitehard could pull off seven dudes. And it didn't always work for him all the time either. But, he's an exception. I mean ... yeah.

Five the absolute max anybody should reasonably try. And if you can't get everything rolling with three studs - who are, really, the perfect number - then you need to get some new studs anyways. But, for the "traditional" - "lots of guys" - gang-bang - then, five.

Five is the magic number.

[French-Touch]

Three (actually) talented studs is all you really need or want in a scene. Three is the magic number.

If you absolutely need more - then 5 is the next (but final) step. And even then, it's really hard for the guys to coordinate effectively, not just because of their number, but because of what the act itself requires and how they need to participate.

There is nothing worse than watching a bunch of dudes standing around and jerking off. It's like - fuck off with that shit. Whenever I see that - regardless of the homosexual overtones (which I am also not a fan of) - it's a betrayal of the purpose and the energy of the scene.

You want to see a girl getting fucked raw. You don't want to see a bunch of dudes lining up, standing still, and looking like they're waiting for the bus with (literally) their dicks in their hand. It kills the momentum. It kills the energy. It kills the kinetic vicious action of the scene where there's a whole bunch of dudes driving to the net constantly and consistently. Yeah - watching guys just standing there - or trying to find a more comfortable spot on the couch - or ... yawn ... going from around back of the couch, to just slightly in front of it ... isn't what I think when I think "gangbang."

You want a porn shoot to be like a fantasy. You don't want shit to reflect reality. You don't want to see guys fumbling around, or moving their knee a bit to the left on the couch, gotta get that perfect angle ... nope, a bit more, alright, reposition again ... and ...

The reason they're acting so fucking lame is because the energy they themselves are experiencing is just standing around. It's kind of hard to ask somebody to jump off a cliff after they've been standing around for fifteen minutes. And this milling-about waiting-for-the-shift-to-end energy infects the rest of the scene, until everybody goes from playing a game of musical chairs (the energy it should have) to a sad and listless game of pin the tail on the donkey.

Nope ... not there ... almost ... oopff ... just a touch to the left, nope ... not there either ... and it's like fuck!

Five is the absolute max. And even that is super difficult. But it prevents overcrowding - and everyone can expect to get some action, even if it's the girl who's rubbing them off, at the same time. The minute you have any more than that - then - no.

NRX and Nick Whitehard could pull off seven dudes. And it didn't always work for him all the time either. But, he's an exception. I mean ... yeah.

Five the absolute max anybody should reasonably try. And if you can't get everything rolling with three studs - who are, really, the perfect number - then you need to get some new studs anyways. But, for the "traditional" - "lots of guys" - gang-bang - then, five.

Five is the magic number.

Its only ur opinions, giorgio grandi shoot since many years 80% with more than 5 guys and nobody become homo lol. Best sell of Gio are from big gangbang. 3 man on a girl, it's not a gangbang. that all

[Jaxkbnm]

Three (actually) talented studs is all you really need or want in a scene. Three is the magic number.

If you absolutely need more - then 5 is the next (but final) step. And even then, it's really hard for the guys to coordinate effectively, not just because of their number, but because of what the act itself requires and how they need to participate.

There is nothing worse than watching a bunch of dudes standing around and jerking off. It's like - fuck off with that shit. Whenever I see that - regardless of the homosexual overtones (which I am also not a fan of) - it's a betrayal of the purpose and the energy of the scene.

You want to see a girl getting fucked raw. You don't want to see a bunch of dudes lining up, standing still, and looking like they're waiting for the bus with (literally) their dicks in their hand. It kills the momentum. It kills the energy. It kills the kinetic vicious action of the scene where there's a whole bunch of dudes driving to the net constantly and consistently. Yeah - watching guys just standing there - or trying to find a more comfortable spot on the couch - or ... yawn ... going from around back of the couch, to just slightly in front of it ... isn't what I think when I think "gangbang."

You want a porn shoot to be like a fantasy. You don't want shit to reflect reality. You don't want to see guys fumbling around, or moving their knee a bit to the left on the couch, gotta get that perfect angle ... nope, a bit more, alright, reposition again ... and ...

The reason they're acting so fucking lame is because the energy they themselves are experiencing is just standing around. It's kind of hard to ask somebody to jump off a cliff after they've been standing around for fifteen minutes. And this milling-about waiting-for-the-shift-to-end energy infects the rest of the scene, until everybody goes from playing a game of musical chairs (the energy it should have) to a sad and listless game of pin the tail on the donkey.

Nope ... not there ... almost ... oopff ... just a touch to the left, nope ... not there either ... and it's like fuck!

Five is the absolute max. And even that is super difficult. But it prevents overcrowding - and everyone can expect to get some action, even if it's the girl who's rubbing them off, at the same time. The minute you have any more than that - then - no.

NRX and Nick Whitehard could pull off seven dudes. And it didn't always work for him all the time either. But, he's an exception. I mean ... yeah.

Five the absolute max anybody should reasonably try. And if you can't get everything rolling with three studs - who are, really, the perfect number - then you need to get some new studs anyways. But, for the "traditional" - "lots of guys" - gang-bang - then, five.

Five is the magic number.

Its only ur opinions, giorgio grandi shoot since many years 80% with more than 5 guys and nobody become homo lol. Best sell of Gio are from big gangbang. 3 man on a girl, it's not a gangbang. that all

A gangbang starts at 5 people. Meaning 4 guys+1 girl. If you have 3 guys +1 girl that is group sex. Some people here dont know definition and obessions with shitty directors. lol

[hyapet]

Five is the magic number.

A gangbang starts at 5 people. Meaning 4 guys+1 girl. If you have 3 guys +1 girl that is group sex. Some people here dont know definition and obessions with shitty directors. lol[/quote]

Looks like some people here don't know how to read.

Or, from the looks of it, count up to the number five. Sorry, sorry, my bad. You don't know how to read.

That's this one: 5

As in:

Five is the magic number.

[hyapet]

Five is the magic number.

A gangbang starts at 5 people. Meaning 4 guys+1 girl. If you have 3 guys +1 girl that is group sex. Some people here dont know definition and obessions with shitty directors. lol

Looks like some people here don't know how to read.

Or, from the looks of it, count up to the number five. Sorry, sorry, my bad. You don't know how to read.

That's this one: 5

As in:

Five is the magic number.

[ElJab78]

Closeted homoboys want more dudes in scenes.