fredflehoux wrote:idk what to tell you. This site is trying to give as much sexual fetishes to as many as they can.
dap-addict wrote:fredflehoux wrote:idk what to tell you. This site is trying to give as much sexual fetishes to as many as they can.
+ 1
Porn is like fashion and now pussy porn backlash is popular, therefore studios shoot that pussy content much more.
Btw, Giorgio Grandi stopped shooting Summer 2024 in case you didnt notice.
hyapet wrote:Like, how hard would it really be, to have a girl brought in on her knees, for her to get gag-fucked continuously, and then for the guys to start plowing her in the ass as she's doing this, for them then, in the same scene, to flip her around, and start double anal'ing her, to then start gagging her with cock as they're doing this, to then flip her around again, and have one dude right on top of her while another dude is right behind her doing double anal again, just that this time, while they're stuffing her throat full of cock, they start peeing into her stomach, forcing her to snort piss through her nose, and then the guys behind really start going in on the double anal.
jjwhite1985 wrote:I generally agree that lots of cuts makes for really bad porn, but in all seriousness it's actually pretty fucking difficult to do what you describe here. The actors are human and they need to take small breaks, especially the girl and expecially the more hardcore and demanding the sex acts are. Then you also need to make sure you're getting the right angles and lighting, and that multiple bodies are in the correct position for shooting, which get more difficult the more bodies are involved and the harder the action is.
hyapet wrote:And they should adopt the "ten man rollercoaster" philosophy of shooting porn. A guy goes in - and keeps fucking her stupid - until he comes - and then he gets swapped out for the next guy who's ready to come in and take over. Just a continuous train of hard fucking. No fucking around. Just an endless hard pounding.
hyapet wrote:The real crime doesn't come in the bizarre fetishes, even though, agreed, many of them are either just gross or do very little sexually - the real crime is in all the camera cuts that these bizarre exhibitions induce.
They just can't straight shoot a scene for forty fucking minutes - can they. It's like - next to impossible.
jjwhite1985 wrote:And are you expecting the girl to still be alive after 40 solid minutes of this?
dap-addict wrote:Porn has always been a show and had always lots of cuts.
Actually an AH/GIO scene has less cuts than most 1990ties porn.
But yep, talking with porn girls about their bookings after their job is done many tell me that piss was just a good break from assfucking for them. This is why piss as such doenst add anything for me if it's not combined with simultaneous assfucking. Same with p*ke, which I can only stuff away if the girls gets DAP-ed simultaneously. You find this scenes, you just have to look for them!
fredflehoux wrote:idk what to tell you. This site is trying to give as much sexual fetishes to as many as they can.
the scenes have regular fucking, anal only, piss segments, ass play segments, facial cumshot segments, blowbang segments, dvp segments. If you're into dvp, you go to the dvp segment of the scene and jerk off there. If you like milder double penetration without piss. you go to the place in the scene where that's what is happening and avoid the segments of pissing.
These kind of rants are like screaming at the clouds for stealing your sunshine, it's not gonna change anything, you look a bit deranged. Their bussiness aim to sell more of their porducts to as many people as possible. Which require tapping in all kind of kinks and fitting it all in one scene. That's why you have segments of action that continually change.. because some like the piss part better, some like the ass fucking part better, some like the cumshot in the face part better.
Basically grow up, that's what i'm trying to convey in the end
RawMeat wrote:There seems to be a constant persistence in Analpiss directors like Giorgio Grandi and Angelo Godshack to come up with the most retarded ideas in their contents. I believe this not only translates an obvious intellectual shallowness but also a blatant dishonesty to fill-up the void characterizing their videos with nonsex acts that the most untalented, unmotivated actress would love to perform and hence make easy peazy crazy silly money
Take pee play / pee drinking for instance. They clearly are a fetish that does not involve sexual intercourse or penetration but pure softcore eroticism. Lazy chicks would sign up for such garbage coz it's just getting a pay cheque for taking a shower
Same for cake eating or milk drinking or tip fucking or giving fake rimjob where the only display are twerking male asses
The other annoying idiosyncrasy of these dumb directors is that they make these stupid fetishes pervasive - an everlasting recurring nuisance that plagues real actual fucking
That got me concluding that there's not doubt Analpiss' main contribution to porn is to erase any female sexual symbol or mainstream sex, period. Curvy women are eliminated, vaginas are hidden and red tapped, penetrative sexual actions shrinked as much as possible in favour of obsessive homoerotic fetishes (male pee drinking [Giorgio Grandi] and male asshole eating [Angelo Godshack])
and then there's those brillant directors who get back to the basics and return to the original sources: exploring an innovative niche exposing pure femaleness that cannot be faked or simulated: solo pregnant gangbangs with DVP, DAP, double blowjobs, double creampie, multiple load swallowing... only stuffs a genuine cum hungry whore would do and any phoney prude lazy-ass girl would shun
Yeah those scenes though not the roughest were smoking hot.
When it comes to highlight genuine great achievements, it's natural to hone such a candid efforts but when it comes to bullshitting straight audiences with obsessive gay shit every f-ing minutes, the least one can do is to debunk such crap
If you want to be an innovative porn director at least have the audacity to produce out of the box many-on-one actions that makes multiple sexual penetrative hardcore actions great again and quit making a fool out of your audience by deceitfully filling-up the emptiness of your contents with nonsex softcore BS. Focus on Full-Nelson/standing/lateral DPs, DVPs, DAPs, TPs, show us real actual fucking not BS male feet sucking or male asshole licking, be real for once in your actions and stop faking things up to make money or else better get producing AI porn with beer drinking dicks fucking an octopus in a swivelling cage
RawMeat wrote: and there's no surprise brain damaged retards have their head so neck deep inside their retarded gaylords they can't even read between the lines the relentless CUT-through porn is UNWATCHABLE
It's like watching microseconds of shagging every seconds
BTW GIO May be not producing but he still directs the production and sets the editorial tone of his garbage to his brainless spineless lackeys
fredflehoux wrote:RawMeat wrote: and there's no surprise brain damaged retards have their head so neck deep inside their retarded gaylords they can't even read between the lines the relentless CUT-through porn is UNWATCHABLE
It's like watching microseconds of shagging every seconds
BTW GIO May be not producing but he still directs the production and sets the editorial tone of his garbage to his brainless spineless lackeys
Mmhhh mmhh retard for sure, i could explain to you how any type of nuclear reactor works but i'm a retard i guess.
You sound like the kind of loser who think porn should answer to the deep need for love and romance, while the vast majority of mature adults understand it's exaggerated sexual fetished to cum. Even porn watchers here know this is not real human sexuality, it's fetishes. If you've never been touched by any girl i understand you might be looking here for this romance and human connection but unfortunately you're part of a minority who think this is the purpose of porn.
It serve to cum and most people here have been with real women and do not need it to be romantic and very complicated. I watched porn since the 90ies and i honestly do not miss the more narrative heavy porn that was more popular back then. They are called actresses but tbh they generally can't act for shit, and those stories were not really bringing the emotions intended. Again most people watch porn for the physical need of it, not the romantic aspect of it.
Lastly this site is buying so many sites, you got amateur stuff, some more standard porn like bangbros, some solo girls who publish their mild stuff.
I cannot understand your point of view without thinking you are a loveless loser who never been touched by another human ever and you want to fill that hole with porn, which is not what the vast majority of people need it for.
hyapet wrote:The pure physicality of the fucking is what drives most people to watch porn. It's why they're there. Yet - when that's all there is - continuously - in porno after porno - the whole thing becomes somewhat stale as well.
That's why they added pissing, and puking, and all the other garbage.
dap-addict wrote:hyapet wrote:The pure physicality of the fucking is what drives most people to watch porn. It's why they're there. Yet - when that's all there is - continuously - in porno after porno - the whole thing becomes somewhat stale as well.
That's why they added pissing, and puking, and all the other garbage.
Me, personally, I'd prefer variation with cloths, style and basic porn story.
But for LP/AV after over 1 year long complete piss ban it turned out that wet scenes in 99% of cases sell better than dry scenes.
So call it retarded or garbage, it's just really economics!
Btw, needless to say that 'piss' added makes shooting more complicated and cleaning up after as well. It would be easier to shoot porn without pissing and - yes, it would be easier to find girls - but LP/AV isnt mainstream porn, never was and hopefully never will be. So here you go!
hyapet wrote:And because it's in the same place as DAP and DVP porn - it's tainted those genres with the same degradation that pissing inherently has - which is exactly why it's so hard to find actresses who want to shoot in those scenes.
fredflehoux wrote:RawMeat wrote: and there's no surprise brain damaged retards have their head so neck deep inside their retarded gaylords they can't even read between the lines the relentless CUT-through porn is UNWATCHABLE
It's like watching microseconds of shagging every seconds
BTW GIO May be not producing but he still directs the production and sets the editorial tone of his garbage to his brainless spineless lackeys
Mmhhh mmhh retard for sure, i could explain to you how any type of nuclear reactor works but i'm a retard i guess.
You sound like the kind of loser who think porn should answer to the deep need for love and romance, while the vast majority of mature adults understand it's exaggerated sexual fetished to cum. Even porn watchers here know this is not real human sexuality, it's fetishes. If you've never been touched by any girl i understand you might be looking here for this romance and human connection but unfortunately you're part of a minority who think this is the purpose of porn.
It serve to cum and most people here have been with real women and do not need it to be romantic and very complicated. I watched porn since the 90ies and i honestly do not miss the more narrative heavy porn that was more popular back then. They are called actresses but tbh they generally can't act for shit, and those stories were not really bringing the emotions intended. Again most people watch porn for the physical need of it, not the romantic aspect of it.
Lastly this site is buying so many sites, you got amateur stuff, some more standard porn like bangbros, some solo girls who publish their mild stuff.
I cannot understand your point of view without thinking you are a loveless loser who never been touched by another human ever and you want to fill that hole with porn, which is not what the vast majority of people need it for.
dap-addict wrote:hyapet wrote:And because it's in the same place as DAP and DVP porn - it's tainted those genres with the same degradation that pissing inherently has - which is exactly why it's so hard to find actresses who want to shoot in those scenes.
This is probabely your most blatant logical bible writing fault:
Neither DAP nor DVP are part of a degradation but if something at the core is its real graphic fucking on film as such. Once a girl took this step than DAP is just the best payed act and doing piss adds 100-200$ on top to her payment. It's not about degradation, but earning more or earning less.
dap-addict wrote:hyapet wrote:The pure physicality of the fucking is what drives most people to watch porn. It's why they're there. Yet - when that's all there is - continuously - in porno after porno - the whole thing becomes somewhat stale as well.
That's why they added pissing, and puking, and all the other garbage.
Me, personally, I'd prefer variation with cloths, style and basic porn story.
But for LP/AV after over 1 year long complete piss ban it turned out that wet scenes in 99% of cases sell better than dry scenes.
So call it retarded or garbage, it's just really economics!
Btw, needless to say that 'piss' added makes shooting more complicated and cleaning up after as well. It would be easier to shoot porn without pissing and - yes, it would be easier to find girls - but LP/AV isnt mainstream porn, never was and hopefully never will be. So here you go!
jjwhite1985 wrote:Usually there will be a fee for the scene, which will be higher for a DP scene, higher again for a DAP scene etc. Then another fee for "wet" on top of that, plus whatever else is agreed between performer and producer.
Stop talking out your ass and apply some thought.
jjwhite1985 wrote:I'm not a fan of piss at all, does nothing for me. But the reality is wet scenes sell better than dry scenes, it is what it is.
Just engage your brain and think - wet scenes are more difficult to make, require more prep, big cleanup afterwards, all of this increases the cost and logistics involved, plus the extra cost to pay the models the "wet fee". Then you also lower the number of girls you can hire as not all of them are down to shoot wet stuff. Given all of this, why in the absolute fuck would they choose to make this type of scene if it wasn't more profitable than the alternative? You can reel off all the things you hate about it but it doesn't matter, this is a business, it's not something designed to cater to your specific taste.
Users browsing this forum: paulyshoresituation, PornoManiac and 12 guests