Boshanks wrote:Can you quote me on where I claimed it only matters on drugs ?
gapefan wrote:So you also do not support
(list of activites where people get injured frequently)?Boshanks wrote:Not if drug use is involved to achieve what they otherwise cannot.
gapefan wrote:OMG! You're right! I do see the hypothetical correlation
So then, how come you aren't lobbying to enact a law in which every single ski resort has to turn its customers away, to protect them from themselves?
You obviously don't give a shit about the welfare of others
Boshanks wrote:Gapefan, you seem to be incredibly confused with the difference between an activity, and the misuse of a substance while performing an activity, which is the crux of my point.
gapefan wrote:And while you're at it, let's outlaw:
(list of activites where people get injured frequently)Boshanks wrote:I will state this again so there is no confusion: Your points have nothing to do with my issue, I'm not trying to get porn outlawed, I'm drawing attention to something completely unrelated and dangerous being done while performing it.
That's three different times I brought up activities that others willingly participate in, which have an extensive history of people getting injured
Yet you continually stated that I was
"missing the point" and that your issue (the "crux" as you put it) was with the misuse of a substance, while performing the activity
gapefan wrote:You also can't claim that even without drug use, people don't know their own limitations. And then turn around and say that the reasoning for not using drugs, is so they know their limitations
Boshanks wrote:Of course I can. Without the use of anesthetic people are still capable of not knowing when to stop, they carry on despite being in pain, ignoring the body and potentially landing themselves in hospital, removing it is not going to help that type of person, but then you have those who would stop immediately to prevent injury. With the use of anesthetic you're taking away the ability to receive those warnings, effectively removing the question to stop or carry on because you're not aware of the pain you're in.
If these individuals who aren't using anesthetic
"carry on despite being in pain"? Then it's not an issue of them being
"incapable of knowing when to stop" Their brain is sending the same pain signals you claim they must feel, in order to
"know their limitations" And yet they're consciously making the decision to continue, of their own free will
Why are you not concerned about helping
"that type of person"?
Shouldn't your crusade protect them as well?
Why are you only concerned about helping the ones who, by choice, can't feel the exact same thing that these
"other type of people" (who aren't worth helping) are experiencing?
gapefan wrote:Nobody asked for your help
Do you know why?
Because they don't need it!
Boshanks wrote:Like I said, sometimes in order for something to be looked at and a change to occur, it requires people to speak up and present their views and concerns regarding it.
It certainly does require people to speak up and present their views and concerns in order to be under consideration
And I have yet to hear a single concern from any first party individuals, directly impacted by what you are carrying on about
And why would you hear from them?
They have nothing to be concerned about!
If they don't agree with its use, then they are free not to use it
Boshanks wrote:There are already a few here who agree they don't want anesthetic used on a porn site
The only people I see here expressing concern for it, are those who have some other selfish ulterior motive, like they
"don't like all the double anal" and/or
"the model may not react as realisically as they'd like" Nerdperv wrote:It's a pitty mate, because the lack of reaction is sooo visible now that it totally takes away the charm of it! I mean why watch an intense scene if it isn't intense at all? Are people sooo desperate of watching five dicks up a girl's ass that they forget about the true intensity of the scene???
temp. ftnstudent wrote:Regarding ass numbing and anestetics used in porn, I am strongly against them. Girls in GG scenes can take 3 dicks in the ass with no reaction. They suck dicks while fist and dicks are in they ass like there is nothing going on.
We need more reactions while fucked like brittany etc. It looks lime girls are forced to take fists in their asses while numbed and they are waiting guys to cum so they can grab their money and go home.
Not hot at all!!!
Not a single sentiment of concern for the well being of these performers in any of that
Only selfish comments about what they would like to see in their porn
Boshanks wrote:including, if what he said was the truth, the boss himself.
Well now, is
xxx concerned, or is he not?
Boshanks wrote:I understand that you want to twist this in order to protect your own interests, but the words of this site's owner can not be misinterpreted no matter how hard you try. I asked the STUDIO to stop USING it ages ago, but I hear some models keep ASKING for it. In one sentence he not only confirms the studio is using it, but they must also be providing it if it's being asked for.
For years that fat asshole PW was spreading rumors about how DAP was being continuously achieved here, that information was being provided to him primarily by Markus Dupree. I assumed it was complete bullshit, but regrettably it's turned out to be true.
And finally, the angle everyone resorts to eventually, free will (or if you're a complete moron, comparing this discussion to totalitarianism
) Of course these women have the choice to do whatever the fuck they want, does that mean the company doesn't have a responsibility to advise them about the serious dangers of doing it, or better yet, to not allow it ? If
xxx had said I'm furious about this being photographed in my studio, I don't want this shit being used on the sets of my company, I wouldn't have anything to say on the matter, instead he tried to defend it by claiming it's not pure Lidocaine, which is completely untrue, and even compared it to strepsils
Boshanks wrote:Owner confirms the studio has used it, owner confirms the models still request it. And if his response was genuine about having asked the studio to stop using it ages ago, why was he not pissed off about his employees clearly disobeying a direct request, why did he immediately shift the focus on to the models and play down the significance of the product.
You're stumbling over yourself again