dap_addict wrote:respecting their right of free choice ... hypocrite legal steps ... [/quote}
I think the scope of the argument went a bit beyond what you're referencing.
You are looking at everything like you yourself are a lawyer in a courtroom. That you're making the argument to other lawyers ... in a courtroom.
That's not where this discussion lies. This discussion lies in the hearts of the South American people. A people for whom, first off, religion is still a very big thing. So, this stuff just doesn't fly with them at all in that regard. Next up, a people for whom being white is still something that is desired to be. Watching their hottest girls line up at the BBC buffet isn't what they would term "proper social conditioning" and - as an influence on young people in particular - would be something they would want to quash immediately. You might be wanting to get your panties in a twist to call the predictable moronic Western chant of "Racism! Racist!" But I assure you - it's not so much based on hatred - as it is on the realities that their children will be facing in the world. Between being more likely to acquire employment in their home country, to fitting in better in America should they decide to go, to being there for their children should they decide to have them. And again - for them - this isn't based on "feelings" as much as it is a reflection of actual statistics.dap_addict wrote:largely exaggerate negative effects on relationships ... Finally porn is a meaningful employment, too!
No exaggeration. Typically girls who are in their "discovering themselves" phase will stand by their position to the hilt. But then, once they turn 30+, and they might start thinking about having kids, but might want an actual partner with which to do that with, then things start to often change. It's a biological clock thing. And now, once they've accumulated the trauma of having hundreds, if not thousands of guys, run through them like they're a subway turnstile, the capacity of them to hold onto a meaningful relationship where they are fulfilled becomes increasingly more difficult and unlikely. No guy who's an actual alpha-male wants to get with a 30+ year old that's been run through by, literally, everybody. On the Internet of all places no less. Automatically, they know, as isis666xxx pointed out:isis666xxx wrote:size doesnt matter???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
dont make me laugh
Much as quoting isis666xxx might seem counter-intuitive to a solid/reasonable argument - they're actually right on the money with this. When you've been on the rollercoaster of two guys pumping you with 30 inches of foot-round cock, going on the merry-go-round of some normal guy's 6 to 8 incher (if he even measures up to that) won't culminate in the same thrill.
That's why rich men don't line up outside the porn studio to pick up 30-something girl's who've been put through the town's entire cock supply. That's why they line up outside of high-schools to try to encourage the hottest girl to come and live with them rather than go to the cock-testing lab that's college/university.
The culmination of physical, mental, and spiritual trauma makes most, if not almost all of the girls who do porn absolutely incapable of holding onto a meaningful relationship. For both circumstances that are within their control and outside of it (such as societal expectations and desires). The only difference is - you don't really hear the emotional horror stories of most of the porn-stars who've now turned forty, and at most have a cat to keep them company through the rest of their days. And you want to know why you don't hear the emotional horror stories of those girls? Because you stopped paying attention to them once they stopped being young and hot. Much like most reasonable and capable men would have done the same. Their options are incredibly limited - and = when you're dealing with the men who you can attract within an incredibly limited pool of people - they don't often end up being the best of folks.
So - this "meaningful employment" argument is a joke. It's about as meaningful as all the African kid's who go into poisonous mines to get the materials needed for your smartphone. It's actually less meaningful - because those kids do that to merely survive - whereas most girls, especially if they're that[/] hot - would have other options when they still possess their youth and purity.
Again - this isn't based on some kind of porn-hatred on my behalf - but merely referencing what is real when it comes to the reality of what happens to the people who do these kinds of acts. Everything from the psychological to the emotional to the physical effects of a porn career have shown that it leaves an absolute warzone worth of bodies in it's wake of people who are crippled to their core. Chances are! Chances are - they weren't doing that good when they entered the industry - and there are indeed those socio and psychopathic enough for which the lifestyle and career of porn is the perfect fit for their psychological make-up. But, for most others, no, porn isn't a "meaningful career." It's anything but.
And why I'm mentioning this is because unlike what this guy says ...
[quote="Finally we return to the main part of this topic ..."
This [I]is the main basis of the topic. Maybe not the exact legal maneuverings, political backroom deals, or names of people involved - but the very bedrock for why any of those things would be allowed in the first place in the pursuit of this objective of squashing porn.
It's very much seen as a societal ill. For absolutely sound reasons. As I said - there are always exceptions. There are girls for whom this lifestyle is a perfect fit (granted, they will be mentally ill), but nevertheless, it is an environment in which they will be able to thrive whilst enjoying it. But, outside of that, the stuffing painful amounts of cock into the tightest holes of young girls (re: going back to them dressing them all up like they're still in high school) for the enjoyment of a male audience is increasingly seen as a major contributor (of all things) to the feminization and weakening of men in the Western and Eastern worlds.
That is why the BRICS nations are working against it. Not only because it's incredibly Western, but because of the damage it does to men in society as well. Forget the fact that instead of going after the average girl - most men are fantasizing about getting with someone they would never end up actually talking to (nor having the two foot long sausage in order to pleasure them with) - they also in turn increasingly grow to resent women for their own perceived (and very often real) rejection as a result of that. Likewise - women see anybody that doesn't look like visigoth202026's Joseph Brown - or aren't equipped like him - as weak and secondary men to be passed over in pursuit of a 6'5 250 lb 15 inch handsome "perfect man."
It's by no small coincidence that the societies that both produce and consume the most porn are the ones in which the birth rates have fallen through the floor and the sexes have been driven further apart from one another than in the entire history of the human race. Make no mistake - there are other factors that contribute to this (plenty of them) - but from a societal perspective - this is one of the largest wedge drivers into both the social fabric and cohesion of many/most/if not all of Western/Eastern societies.
Which is one of the main reasons why Russia, China, and the rest of the BRIC nations are increasingly upping their ante and increasing their attacks on the people who both produce and distribute porn.
Fucking real talk.
You want an answer to the question posed by this very topic? That's fucking it. That's the root cause of all of this.
Everything else is a technicality. That there - that is the heart and source of the entire matter.
Absolutely seriously