justinwarren41 wrote:LTP478 and LTP479 are new. The "new" Lunatica one is longer by 4 minutes, weird though
dap-addict wrote:Also today's LTP482 with Emily White has been already released as LTP414 a dozen weeks ago. They even put a "new" tag on it, but real fans dont get fooled.
Such a blantant fraud, while they dont release new scenes!
feltrough wrote:sad day, we get less and less new scenes lately. recycling old stuff and compilations etc.
dap-addict wrote:Also today's LTP482 with Emily White has been already released as LTP414 a dozen weeks ago. They even put a "new" tag on it, but real fans dont get fooled.
Such a blantant fraud, while they dont release new scenes!
jzabel19571964 wrote:I appreciate your insight and agree completely. The incredible young hot talent that these studios were able to find including the I agree, phenomenal Hayek sisters, as well as Camila Cooper, Elina Sansd, Katherin Moore, Ruby Walker, Megan Petite, and others over the past 1-2 years is almost unmatched with possible exception of NRX with one of my all time favorites Sasha Paige and others. I wonder whether we are seeing the slow demise of AnalVids.
hyapet wrote:[...]nevertheless, the minute governments saw a weakness, or, rather, a distraction from people's need to consume highly degrading porn, they all simultaneously swooped in to crush their respective markets.
And - honestly - I can understand why. We might be the degenerates who enjoy this stuff - but there is a lot of people for whom talking to a girl who looks like these girls do in their home country would result in an immediate rejection. Just to watch her go and get tossed around by seven black guys in front of a video camera whilst laughing about it? I mean, honestly, life fucking sucks enough.
I don't blame them for going in there and quashing it. I really don't. I fully get it. I really do. And I don't disagree with it.
And because of the nature of the business - and the trail it's left of absolutely destroyed young women in it's wake (and I'm not referencing AV/PB with this) - there is literally no-one who's going to stick up for the industry in any meaningful way.
surbhigurgaon wrote:The Colombian adult film industry is facing a crisis primarily due to changes in legal regulations, economic challenges, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Colombian government has introduced stricter regulations on adult content production, aiming to address issues such as exploitation and illegal activities within the industry. These new regulations include more stringent licensing requirements and increased oversight, which have made it more difficult for producers to operate.
M_sicas_Candido wrote:Folks, it seems like matters are being mixed up here. Are we really referring to legal studios? You seem to be talking about women who became sex slaves, not professional performers. For a moment I thought we were discussing the Deep Web and mafias that exploit women in search of profits.
Some here have commented on degradation, exploitation and other things. This actually exists within the sexual marketplace - an "ecosystem" that is much more comprehensive than the adult audio-visual industry.
hyapet wrote:What I'm talking about are the acts themselves. Like, when you take an 18 year old from any country and have two 6'9 250 lbs black dudes ram a combined 32 inches of foot round meat up her hole at the same time, and then take a piss on her afterwards, there are going to be lots of people out there that are "not okay" with that.
Legal or not, the porn industry is not a good place to be in, typically. The girls have to sacrifice a lot to get into it.
hyapet wrote:This isn't meant to brand all girl's like this - there are quite a number of actively seek out this kind of lifestyle - and take absolute pleasure in it. There are also a ton of girls who end up going into a mega depression spiral, get addicted to drugs, keep doing more and more degrading acts, and eventually kill themselves or die from an OD.
Legal or not, the porn industry is not a good place to be in, typically. The girls have to sacrifice a lot to get into it. Like any kind of meaningful employment anywhere else - or, in 99% likelihood, any stable long-term relationship (i.e: marriage) with a good, decent, capable man. The kind you want to raise a family with.
And that's just it - no country likes to see their absolute hottest girls end up in the whore house.
dap-addict wrote:This is really turning into an anti-porn rant!
If we agree on free market economy and freedom of individual choice wouldn't it be better to let the peer groups like churches and teenage crisis hotlines etc advise young women against porn while at the same time respecting their right of free choice instead of supporting states to take arbitrary and hypocrite legal steps against legal porn productions, firms of a free market economy?
Also you seem to mix porn and prostitution and largely exaggerate negative effects on relationships, features typical for anti-porn campaigners.
Finally porn is a meaningful employment, too!
m_sicas_Candido wrote:Although I don't doubt that there are studios that shoot gangbang scenes with 18 or 19 year old girls, I say that this is complete madness and a bold gamble. This is like ordering a newly qualified and inexperienced doctor to perform a heart transplant! I mean, a lot can go wrong. I think that the producers that do this - which I resort to calling professionals - don't survive for long these days; it is unethical; It's playing irresponsibly with the lives of such young people. The AV studios experts in gangbangs (these are really professionals) at least shoot their content with girls who are already sufficiently trained to manage it, no one is fooled; everyone is well aware of their choices.
Now, every job requires a necessary vocation. The thing about being a porn star is about managing the exposure that is generated as a result of the activity itself. I'm sure the AV girls have already learned how to deal with this.
jzabel19471964 wrote:Many great points. The bottom line is that I agree with you that the porn of 5 years ago is dead. No longer are incredibly hot 18-22 females lining up in droves to shoot scenes for mainstream porn studios. The quality of American porn has especially declined and is much more vanilla than in the past. This is very unfortunate in my view, but the new norm.
hyapet wrote:dap-addict wrote:This is really turning into an anti-porn rant!
If we agree on free market economy and freedom of individual choice wouldn't it be better to let the peer groups like churches and teenage crisis hotlines etc advise young women against porn while at the same time respecting their right of free choice instead of supporting states to take arbitrary and hypocrite legal steps against legal porn productions, firms of a free market economy?
Also you seem to mix porn and prostitution and largely exaggerate negative effects on relationships, features typical for anti-porn campaigners.
Finally porn is a meaningful employment, too!
Me discussing why others find legitimate issues with porn does not equate to my post turning into an "anti-porn rant."
hyapet wrote:When people flaunt their naked body as their trade - and everyone gets comfortable with the idea that that person is okay with it - suddenly the walls and barriers for "asking them if they want to fuck you for money" aren't really raised that high. In fact - as can be seen in plenty of the discussions on this board - lots of the actresses have side gigs in prostitution. (...) It goes beyond porn, though. Look at the girls on IG.
hyapet wrote:Finally - if you're relying on the "free-market economy" to win your side of the argument - you're simply going to lose. Not because you're wrong - but because hearts and minds aren't won over by the "free-market of selling your pussy online." They're won by families getting torn apart - by young women getting into dangerous addiction cycles (...)I said free market and free will.
Ofc I see what wins hearts, but the dramas mentioned are not related to porn production as such but much deeper society problems.
Also you seem to dwell on a pretty conservative fairytale conception of relationships:hyapet wrote:(...)people seeing performers who are made to look as young as absolutely possible taking amounts of dick so huge, no single man (who isn't built like a tree) could ever satisfy her again.
Porn is a fantasy. In reality size doenst matter in sex but intimacy and emotional bond does.hyapet wrote:No dude, in his right mind, in a loving and satisfying relationship, would ever figure he wants to open up the web and look at porn. Why would he? He's got the real thing right there.
dap-addict wrote:Also, please be aware that I am talking about Colombian government apparently takeing legal actions against porn production. And while I can see why they are doing it, I still think it's completely hypocrite.
This is what the tread is about: Discussing the reasons of the Colombian porn production crisis.
hyapet wrote:(...)performers who are made to look as young as absolutely possible (...)
Porn is a fantasy. In reality size doenst matter in sex but intimacy and emotional bond does.
Users browsing this forum: rroper472 and 23 guests