Moderator: admin
Vawkes wrote:What is wrong with a traditional DP? (...) Even if the scene started with some basic pussy or DP fucking
dap-addict wrote:I had to <FF> enough pussy only sex the last 20 years in porn to be entitled to garanteed STA intros
dap-addict wrote:I gladly let you have 1-3% pussy footage scenes on LP, but not more!
Vawkes wrote:I'm not saying we shouldn't see any scenes that are 0% Pussy, but they should be limited far more.
Gangbangs with guys simply smashing each hole, balls-deep would be more attractive to purchase. How about a gangbang scene which is strictly DP and ball-deep fucking with one dick to a whole?
dap-addict wrote:I suggest you folks learn to read the sales statistics!
(and some of you learn to stick to Giorgio Grandi's work instead of mixing all up, girl section and overall LP sales section etc.)
Latest guinea pig by Giorgio was Ornella Morgan/Tera Link anal/dp (GIO325) and this just doenst sell by far as good as all his overall rare recent 0% pussy content.
If you want no holes barred gangbangs than gonzo 10on1 or 8 in all is for sure a good LP format.
This however is the Giorgio Grandi forum section!
Vawkes wrote:I'm not saying we shouldn't see any scenes that are 0% Pussy, but they should be limited far more.
Boshanks wrote:And to back that up, If you look at the top 20 best sellers on this site you'll notice they cover all bases for fans, there is no 0% scene in the top 20.
Boshanks wrote:My argument is the popularity of a model is what drives sales
hjohjole wrote:3 or 2 scenes out of 20 i would say is still a fairly accurate representation of the rate in witch LP releases no pussy scenes. There would probably be more if the rate was different.
dap-addict wrote:Boshanks wrote:My argument is the popularity of a model is what drives sales
Girls drive the scenes and thus also sales, yes! Nothing new here, but what we are talking about is certain porn sex acts selling better or worse recently.
If we dont talk about recently than what is OP point at all?
dap-addict wrote:I have the impression, however, you highjacked that OP thread to get some other message through. I know where you come from, and you know where I do. Basically nothing has changed, release schedules always were un-balance and your overall stats show that 0% pussy still is really a tiny minority here. Intersting just how threatened you feel when you dont get the usual 90-95% vaginal friendly porn dose. You really digged a deep hole for your grave battle! :mad
hjohjole wrote:Vawkes wrote:I'm not saying we shouldn't see any scenes that are 0% Pussy, but they should be limited far more.
Then you will have to explain to me exactly how they would be able to limit it "far" more without removing it completely.
I just counted all the scenes released so far for the month of February and this is how many scenes contain DP and/or regular vaginal sex for the different studios:
Gonzo: 21/24
Giorgio: 8/13
IV 7/7: They actually have not made a single scene without DP for the entire time they have been releasing on LP (except for the cuckold scenes)
F Models 2/2
So that's 38 scenes with pussy (mostly DP) and 8 scenes without. How is that not enough for you?
Giorgio is the only director that actually has a balanced output with a fair mix of pussy and no pussy scenes. The other studios cater pretty much exclusively to DP fans. There is literally no other website or porn company out there that even comes close to releasing as many DP scenes as LP does. How is that not enough?
Vawkes wrote:Make an experimental scene named '0% Anal' with a top performer - basically fucking and stuffing her pussy hard in a gangbang. See what happens...
dap-addict wrote:But while vanilla pressure has mounted for the last 2-3 months sales speak more than a 1000 words.
tinakayhardcore wrote:ciofani wrote:Tina no fuck in pussy?why?
Coz, this is all about the ASS, ASS and ASS!
And my sweet tight ass got a special multiple Double Ass treatment! No complains here.
tinakayhardcore wrote:ciofani wrote:i love ass Tina! new DP please fuck in pussy!
I have tons of DP scenes being released on a weekly basis for all other companies, please feel free to do your research darling.
gapefan wrote:tinakayhardcore wrote:ciofani wrote:i love ass Tina! new DP please fuck in pussy!
I have tons of DP scenes being released on a weekly basis for all other companies, please feel free to do your research darling.
dap-addict wrote:I suggest you folks learn to read the sales statistics!
Vawkes wrote:I don't want anal-only scenes to be stopped. I just want some form of fairness. As I say, you can't compare statistics like that, when virtually all these scenes turn into anal stuffing experiments. It is good to see a woman manage to take 3 guys in her ass, but really it is only the tip of the dick that is in there. This also makes it difficult to actually see penetration too.
All I'm asking for is some balance. In the last few days, two gangbang scenes with top performers; Tina Kay and Lola Shine were really disappointing due to them being 0% pussy. That is just a slap in the face to someone who has been eagerly anticipating these gangbang scenes, to see both their holes destroyed.
Vawkes wrote:Make an experimental scene named '0% Anal' with a top performer - basically fucking and stuffing her pussy hard in a gangbang. See what happens...
gapefan wrote:DAP, TP, and TAP are what gives LegalPorno its competetive advantage
Otherwise it's just another DDFNetwork, 21Sextury, PerfectGonzo, etc.
In order for LegalPorno to continue charging premium prices for à la carte content, it has to offer something more than the average porn site, in order to differentiate itself from the plethora of cheaper alternatives
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest