dap-addict wrote:LP is more demanding sex acts for sure, but than DDF shots do take a lot of time to be in the box on the other hand.
Girls can choose of course, but if the owner of both studios is the same combined bookings would prevent a draught of certain models here or there.
Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?
Giorgio Grandi wrote:A model with free will is a kid with a bazooka (for her own career)
LP doesnt keep any model "as exclusive to LP" (at least for my knowledge), so no one is stealing to LP.
avanfurwet wrote:
Iddaoeeok wrote:I kinda like seeing girls work with other companies, often their whole look changes, due to different make-up and photography. I saw something Roxy Dee shot for another company recently and she looked much better than she ever did at LP.
Kriss1986 wrote:Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?
It should be a question to Dap-a. Don't know maybe booking for DDF and LP is somehow connected or something?
dap-addict wrote:Kriss1986 wrote:Maybe I'm stupid but I don't understand who is "stealing" from who?
It should be a question to Dap-a. Don't know maybe booking for DDF and LP is somehow connected or something?
Both companies have the same owner, thus best option seems DDF & LP bound contracts, i.e. any girl wanting to work for DDF should also work for LP and bice versa, IF the girl is capable of offering something for both companies. If bookings had been done that way in 2016, we'd had much more Karina Grand scenes on LP. And users of both studios would be happy, not only DDF vanilla porn users.
I suggest bound DDF-LP bookings in 2017 only since both studios have the same owner and share a lot of models already.
Btw, free will of course they have, but a) as Giorgio says and b) if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else.
So, if I understood correctly. This proposal is that any girl who wants to work for DDF would also be somehow "required" to work for LP and vice versa.
My personal opinion is that a company which tried this tactic would become the "kid with a bazooka".
"if they dont wanna work for both studios they can always work somewhere else" - well, I think that is true and LP and DDF would both lose out.
On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.
Presumably TWM and United Models and Marko, etc. will work these contacts already. But I guess LP and DDF could maybe be more pro-active in coordinating activities to make it more attractive for girls to work for their studios.
avanfurwet wrote:On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.
drevokocur66 wrote:I love the different schools of thought, but somehow in the wishful thinking of our minds we forget that like most things, this is about money.
The girls will go, as long as they feel safe and not threatened, to the place that pays the most for as little work as possible.
There may turn up an exception or two along the way, but bottom line... money
The studios... money
The distributors... money
The girls... money
You can sit there and wish it was something else, but it is not.
It's just business.
dap-addict wrote:avanfurwet wrote:On the other hand, if the companies use a carrot instead of a stick, maybe LP and DDF can cooperate better and offer the girls more work across all studios.
Ok, thats better than makeing bookings for both studios compulsary. But belonging to the same porn imperium now both studios should collaborate much better in 2017 with bookings and schedules. Some girls like Karina Grand just took an easy road and started forcusing on DDF only. Of course is their free will and free choice, but with an appropriate payment policy both studios could prevent a draught at one of them - and regarding the different users that move would be just fair!
dap-addict wrote:drevokocur66 wrote:I love the different schools of thought, but somehow in the wishful thinking of our minds we forget that like most things, this is about money.
The girls will go, as long as they feel safe and not threatened, to the place that pays the most for as little work as possible.
There may turn up an exception or two along the way, but bottom line... money
The studios... money
The distributors... money
The girls... money
You can sit there and wish it was something else, but it is not.
It's just business.
Exactly, its about the money!
And rates in Bp are still too high!
Its inherited from mid 2000, but since LP could change Prague it may also start to change Budapest in 2017.
Its just a right price policy needed - and a bit less autonomy for Golden Age loveing Denys!
DDF and LP can make a strong combo in Europorn, but coop cant end with just sharing the talent pool!
Btw, look at this and draw your conclusions:
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/54 ... a+denville - http://www.legalporno.com/model/3351/lucia_denville
http://ddfnetwork.com/pornstars/view/4497/karina+grand
avanfurwet wrote:So, if I understood correctly. This proposal is that any girl who wants to work for DDF would also be somehow "required" to work for LP and vice versa.
My personal opinion is that a company which tried this tactic would become the "kid with a bazooka".
Giorgio Grandi wrote:LP doesnt keep any model "as exclusive to LP" (at least for my knowledge), so no one is stealing to LP.
Btw, and as already stated, a flexible approach is needed, but more booking coop for sure - as well as fairer Bp rates.
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course.
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.
With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course.
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.
With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.
dap-addict wrote:Some elements of DDF glamour can be fine of course.
But DDF vanilla means a pussy-friendly approach in porn, ie. much fewer DP scenes, seldom STA, almost no DAP scenes etc.
Thats easier to perform for the girls of course, less demanding, which donst mean less time spent in the studio to shoot a scene though.
With Karina Grand - reconsidering her end career studio choice - it looks like she opted for this lighter porn option spending more time in Budapest also for personal reasons. Now Angel Rivas doesnt look very keen on hard DP or even DAP in her first few come-back weeks, that's fine and just her choice. Still, I do hope DDF and LP will coop better in 2017 as wel as I count on Prague to level some of those crazy Budapest fees a bit.
Users browsing this forum: DAP_LOVER, simone.urbinati and 30 guests