Just holes and poles nothing more...

[Slayer21]

Remove the the top of girls, don´t let them wearing whole scene, new scene ruinned;
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31977/s ... dap_sz1587

[avanfurwet]

#letthepuppiesout

[Kriss1986]

#letthepuppiesout

#letthepuppiesout +1

[Slayer21]

What a joke! Timea Bella came again to film and the Director Stefano did not tell her to take off the top, another ruinned scene...
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30104/t ... _ass_sz897

[Slayer21]

Don´t know the LP people that is stupid, turn down, bad idea, to cover whole scene the tits, that is ANTIPORNO and they have the name porno in it name.

[Kriss1986]

What a joke! Timea Bella came again to film and the Director Stefano did not tell her to take off the top, another ruinned scene...
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30104/t ... _ass_sz897

I feel your pain . It's really annoying so much scenes were ruined by such tning...

[magizi877]

That's like a 2 year old scene dude. Timea is retired.

[byleth]

Scene is not ruined for me and always a pleassure to see Timea.

[Slayer21]

That's like a 2 year old scene dude. Timea is retired.

Yes few hours ago I saw a comment Timea did about this scene and you right the scene is old and PL is publishing now, but anyway no matter the time it was filmed, that is not the point here, the point is that the tits covered entire clip is no a porn thing, Most people enjoy watching the Tits.

[avanfurwet]

That's like a 2 year old scene dude. Timea is retired.

Yes few hours ago I saw a comment Timea did about this scene and you right the scene is old and PL is publishing now, but anyway no matter the time it was filmed, that is not the point here, the point is that the tits covered entire clip is no a porn thing, Most people enjoy watching the Tits.

[JohnMcSpunkencock]

Don´t know the LP people that is stupid, turn down, bad idea, to cover whole scene the tits, that is ANTIPORNO and they have the name porno in it name.

Pornography and nudity are not the same. Everything has to be varied. Everything

[avanfurwet]

Pornography and nudity are not the same. Everything has to be varied. Everything

Debatable whether everything has to be varied since Gonzo are mining a particular vein of porn for LP with a successful formula.
For example, they don't shoot on location, they don't shoot all-girl, rarely shoot 1-on-1, etc. etc.

If you restrict the debate to costumes then yes there are always some minority fetishists who want to see girls in tops, or hats, or gas-masks, or etc. etc.

But studios can't pander to unprofitable small minorities when they shoot expensive scenes speculatively and put them up on LP hoping to sell as many copies as possible.

The complaints on this board are that too many scenes have tops left on, which is annoying many customers and limiting the appeal of those scenes.
And now IV have followed Gonzo down this road.

That translates into lost sales for LP. And possibly disappointing sales figures for popular models who may even miss out on re-bookings through no fault of their own, because of unpopular costume choices by the studios.

[Slayer21]

Debatable whether everything has to be varied since Gonzo are mining a particular vein of porn for LP with a successful formula.
For example, they don't shoot on location, they don't shoot all-girl, rarely shoot 1-on-1, etc. etc.

If you restrict the debate to costumes then yes there are always some minority fetishists who want to see girls in tops, or hats, or gas-masks, or etc. etc.

But studios can't pander to unprofitable small minorities when they shoot expensive scenes speculatively and put them up on LP hoping to sell as many copies as possible.

The complaints on this board are that too many scenes have tops left on, which is annoying many customers and limiting the appeal of those scenes.
And now IV have followed Gonzo down this road.

That translates into lost sales for LP. And possibly disappointing sales figures for popular models who may even miss out on re-bookings through no fault of their own, because of unpopular costume choices by the studios.

Well said, thanks.

[avanfurwet]

Maybe Gonzo can make a new series: 0% Puppies.

[Kriss1986]

Don´t know the LP people that is stupid, turn down, bad idea, to cover whole scene the tits, that is ANTIPORNO and they have the name porno in it name.

Pornography and nudity are not the same. Everything has to be varied. Everything

I doubt if it's varied for e.g. Inga Devil - if I good count in 2016 three scenes were released and all three are top on. Where do you she variety John? I skipped all three scenes due top on and I will do it for any further scene. I saw some prev pics here and guess what - it seems next scene with her will be again top on.

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30189/inga_devil_takes_3_cocks_in_the_ass_at_the_same_time_slut_triple_anal_dap_tap_sz938

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30170/nikita_belucci_inga_devil_double_anal_dap_orgy_with_3_guys_sz932

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30474/anal_sluts_inga_devil_nataly_gold_enjoy_double_anal_in_hardcore_orgy_sz1038_

This time I don't get your explanation John, sorry...

[Kriss1986]

Maybe Gonzo can make a new series: 0% Puppies.

Maybe... I have even better idea - they could cover models by tarpaulin or something like that - this new seriws could be named "0% nothing" .

[avanfurwet]

Don´t know the LP people that is stupid, turn down, bad idea, to cover whole scene the tits, that is ANTIPORNO and they have the name porno in it name.

Pornography and nudity are not the same. Everything has to be varied. Everything

I doubt if it's varied for e.g. Inga Devil - if I good count in 2016 three scenes were released and all three are top on. Where do you she variety John? I skipped all three scenes due top on and I will do it for any further scene. I saw some prev pics here and guess what - it seems next scene with her will be again top on.

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30189/inga_devil_takes_3_cocks_in_the_ass_at_the_same_time_slut_triple_anal_dap_tap_sz938

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30170/nikita_belucci_inga_devil_double_anal_dap_orgy_with_3_guys_sz932

http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30474/anal_sluts_inga_devil_nataly_gold_enjoy_double_anal_in_hardcore_orgy_sz1038_

This time I don't get your explanation John, sorry...

Good point. Agree.

Without doing any research or gathering any evidence it seems to me that Gonzo often unfairly victimise the slim girls with little puppies for this punishment, e.g. the Delai sisters.

[Kriss1986]

^ It seems to be . Personal I don't have any issue with smaller or even small boobs. Dellai sis are extremely beautiful women and should be presented in all they glory with visible titties!

[kidloco2]

100% agree.

They did it with Natalia Pearl SZ1285 , Kate Sottile SZ1345 , Kate Sottile SZ1250 , Kate Sottile SZ1349, Kate Sottile SZ1261 , Cindy Sweet in SZ1330 and Nicole Sweet in SZ1348 as well as in the beginning
of Charlotte Sartre scenes which
earned for respective LP director a punch in the face ticket.


Even if the girl is insecure about her tits and insists on keeping clothes on, it's job of a director to talk her to taking it off even during the dildo intro.

Glad they showed beautiful small tits of Mina and Kristy Black.

[dap-addict]

I doubt if it's varied for e.g. Inga Devil - if I good count in 2016 three scenes were released and all three are top on.

I get your pain, Kriss.
If you are an Inga Devil fan you sure also want at least in some scenes to see her tits of course.
Generally, though, I have no problems with tops on or off since I concentrate more on the sex performed when watching porn. If I wanna watch puppies there are other outlets, to be honest.
Still, as really a lot of LP users complain constantly, xxx should maybe instruct all directors to at least let the tops come off at some point of most scenes.

[avanfurwet]

Maybe Gonzo can make a new series: 0% Puppies.

Maybe... I have even better idea - they could cover models by tarpaulin or something like that - this new seriws could be named "0% nothing" .

I thought Nacho already tried that

Then the camera could be only for him.

[Kriss1986]

I doubt if it's varied for e.g. Inga Devil - if I good count in 2016 three scenes were released and all three are top on.

I get your pain, Kriss.
If you are an Inga Devil fan you sure also want at least in some scenes to see her tits of course.
Generally, though, I have no problems with tops on or off since I concentrate more on the sex performed when watching porn. If I wanna watch puppies there are other outlets, to be honest.
Still, as really a lot of LP users complain constantly, xxx should maybe instruct all directors to at least let the tops come off at some point of most scenes.

I'm also focusing on the act but I would like to see whole body. Try imagine scene where girl has balaclava on her head - you can still watch the act but it make any sens right? The same I see top on during whole scene. In what tits are worst than other parts of womens body to cover them? I wouldn't have any problems if in some part of scene top would be off - everyone could be happy. In case of Inga for e.g. I was forced to skipp scenes due top, it means lower sales right? Maybe I was only one who skipped those scenes and maybe not. The point is I'm here because I love whole womens body inc tits. Very often I read here that various is the most important thing - where you see various in scenes with Inga? As I said during all scenes released this year her tits were whole time covered. It's really annoying. And as you can see I'm not the only one who is pissed of this situation. Did LP is trying pretend to be CNFM site?

[Kriss1986]

Maybe Gonzo can make a new series: 0% Puppies.

Maybe... I have even better idea - they could cover models by tarpaulin or something like that - this new seriws could be named "0% nothing" .

I thought Nacho already tried that

Then the camera could be only for him.

lol .