No Pussy or 0% pussy porn shouldn't exist!!

[vernk]

those people who likes 0% pussy should go to a gay site. will not find vaginal sex there for sure

Ychym right, just like probably guys who like girls with short hair . Go to other doctor because present specialist don't tell you whole true about condition of your brain...

This is ridiculous and incredibly ignorant. I'm straight and I love girls with short hair. At least here, girls with short hair are much more independent. They also catch the eye a certain way.

This is utterly absurd and based on a total myth that having lots of anal sex causes permanent health problems. 0% Pussy scenes are wonderful, very popular, and not harmful. If you think DAP and TAP are harmful (it's not if done with the proper preparation and care), then you should oppose those acts, not simply having anal only scenes. The reality is that the anus is very resilient and can handle plenty of frequent fucking and stretching with no issue so long as it is properly warmed up beforehand to avoid causing injury. Can injury happen? Yes. But with care, it won't.

Outside of porn, plenty of people play with large anal toys and fisting, and even a small number of people do DAP on their own as well, and even those who have done it for decades are still perfectly fine. Knowing this, I have zero problem watching and enjoying the most extreme anal porn with DAP and TAP exclusively and no pussy fucking at all. Pussy fucking is a turn off for me, and I will and do only buy scenes that are 0% pussy.

This. I couldn't have said it better if I tried. This poll is absurd and carries the same moral equivalence of me doing a poll asking 'should all pussy penetration be banned?'

You know you pussy fans have had it for years with hundreds of sites where vaginal penetration is in the majority, us anal porn fans haven't had it so easy. Aside from sub brands like Ass Traffic, LP is about the only popular commercial site where anal is in the majority and it's what sets it apart from other sites. It's overwhelmingly popular for that reason and 0% pussy scenes are incredibly lucrative. For every one of you who gets aroused by vaginal porn there are equal amounts of others who get no sexual gratification from it.

The fact of the matter is that there are plenty of dp scenes on here and interludes of straight vag pen if you look for it. It's a balance that works and even though I don't get as much out of dp than straight anal I would hate to see it go as it extremely popular for many people and provides a balance.

In defence of men here when I hear a man say to another that by liking anal porn somehow makes you latently gay I cringe. It's one of the weakest strawman arguments you can get. The anus of a female is just that, it's attached to a woman and not a man. If a hetero guy did harbour some latent gay tendencies then surely he'd be sneaking off to the cellar to masturbate to gay porn?

LP is fine just as it is

Thank you for being as reasonable about this as possible. This is how I feel as well. All the scenes are anal, but some are dp, dap, tap, 0% pussy, and it all balances out. And you are right. We aren't asking for a ban on vaginal.

Such an ignorant opinion. There are plenty of men who have zero interest in other men and are only attracted to women, but who don't like pussy. Just because that doesn't describe you and you don't understand it doesn't mean you can blindly dismiss such people as being gay. No, we don't secretly want to have sex with men. We want to see women have anal sex, love anal sex, and ignore their pussy. It's a turn on. It's a kink or a fetish. It's been discussed extensively. If you don't like it, don't buy the scenes.

And people who like vaginal should go elsewhere. This is an anal porn site. That has always been its focus. Stop trying to make LP into another watered down clone of every other shitty porn site out there. Anal dominates most scenes here, and a few 0% pussy scenes mixed in make perfect sense. Stop trying to kill off a minority of the scenes here because they don't appeal to you.

I can't stand DP or pussy scenes, but you don't see me demanding that they stop being produced. Watch the scenes you want and I'll watch the scenes I want.

And fuck off with that tired bullshit about going to a gay porn site. I want to watch women have anal only sex. LP provides that, and I pay them to support those type of scenes.

I admit to being one of these men, I don't have a single 100% vaginal scene downloaded. Other than the exceptions of the few DPs I do like, I've only watched anal scenes for the last 12 years. Unless I'm actually fucking a chick, I have absolutely no interest in pussy sex, and in my experience, anal is just better in every single way. I don't come to LP to watch vaginal. This site is about anal, keep it this way. I actually want more 0% pussy. I think it's the best genre on this site.

[avanfurwet]

those people who likes 0% pussy should go to a gay site. will not find vaginal sex there for sure

Ychym right, just like probably guys who like girls with short hair . Go to other doctor because present specialist don't tell you whole true about condition of your brain...

This is ridiculous and incredibly ignorant. I'm straight and I love girls with short hair. At least here, girls with short hair are much more independent. They also catch the eye a certain way.

Welcome to the forum, and relax, Kriss was being sarcastic in response to a lame attempt at trolling. He even added a sarcasm emoticon.
Might be an idea for future to check a member's posting history here before rushing to confront them, not everyone here is a nice guy like Kriss.

[Kriss1986]

those people who likes 0% pussy should go to a gay site. will not find vaginal sex there for sure

Ychym right, just like probably guys who like girls with short hair . Go to other doctor because present specialist don't tell you whole true about condition of your brain...

hahaha I like anal sex too. Just dont like "just anal sex". If you like ONLY anal maybe you are gay and dont even know. Dont get mad, dude And accept your gay condition is nothing wrong with that.

I see we have a gay specialist here , indeed you are something like human "Gayger counter" . I still can't get over how uniqe skills some of people have, no doubt's trully exceptional ability.

[Kriss1986]

those people who likes 0% pussy should go to a gay site. will not find vaginal sex there for sure

Ychym right, just like probably guys who like girls with short hair . Go to other doctor because present specialist don't tell you whole true about condition of your brain...

This is ridiculous and incredibly ignorant. I'm straight and I love girls with short hair. At least here, girls with short hair are much more independent. They also catch the eye a certain way.

Welcome to the forum, and relax, Kriss was being sarcastic in response to a lame attempt at trolling. He even added a sarcasm emoticon.
Might be an idea for future to check a member's posting history here before rushing to confront them, not everyone here is a nice guy like Kriss.

Thank you Avanfurwet . And @vernk - you misunderstood my statement. It wasn't against women in any single letter! It was a sarcastic retort agains stupidity of some users, well to be honest one user in this topic. My statement is the same ridiculous like statement "if you like 0% pussy you are homo" . Our little "Gayger counter" and the greatest master of gay unmasking everywhere sees potential homo - man who wear read shoes - gay, man who like anal sex - gay, man who has other opoinion than master "Gayger counter" - definitelly gay. It's one of the biggest defeat of democracy - everyone can share his private opinion - even idiot . And you know "from the crowd of people the most eye catching person is an idiot" .

[avanfurwet]

[Kriss1986]

This is utterly absurd and based on a total myth that having lots of anal sex causes permanent health problems. 0% Pussy scenes are wonderful, very popular, and not harmful. If you think DAP and TAP are harmful (it's not if done with the proper preparation and care), then you should oppose those acts, not simply having anal only scenes. The reality is that the anus is very resilient and can handle plenty of frequent fucking and stretching with no issue so long as it is properly warmed up beforehand to avoid causing injury. Can injury happen? Yes. But with care, it won't.

Outside of porn, plenty of people play with large anal toys and fisting, and even a small number of people do DAP on their own as well, and even those who have done it for decades are still perfectly fine. Knowing this, I have zero problem watching and enjoying the most extreme anal porn with DAP and TAP exclusively and no pussy fucking at all. Pussy fucking is a turn off for me, and I will and do only buy scenes that are 0% pussy.

This. I couldn't have said it better if I tried. This poll is absurd and carries the same moral equivalence of me doing a poll asking 'should all pussy penetration be banned?'

You know you pussy fans have had it for years with hundreds of sites where vaginal penetration is in the majority, us anal porn fans haven't had it so easy. Aside from sub brands like Ass Traffic, LP is about the only popular commercial site where anal is in the majority and it's what sets it apart from other sites. It's overwhelmingly popular for that reason and 0% pussy scenes are incredibly lucrative. For every one of you who gets aroused by vaginal porn there are equal amounts of others who get no sexual gratification from it.

The fact of the matter is that there are plenty of dp scenes on here and interludes of straight vag pen if you look for it. It's a balance that works and even though I don't get as much out of dp than straight anal I would hate to see it go as it extremely popular for many people and provides a balance.

In defence of men here when I hear a man say to another that by liking anal porn somehow makes you latently gay I cringe. It's one of the weakest strawman arguments you can get. The anus of a female is just that, it's attached to a woman and not a man. If a hetero guy did harbour some latent gay tendencies then surely he'd be sneaking off to the cellar to masturbate to gay porn?

LP is fine just as it is

Well said Laura and thank you for this statement. As a women you know the best that it is a huge different between women's and man's ass. If someone can't see it, definitely have a big issue and should go to appropriate specialist. I also can't understand why someone will choosed LP to complain about DAP and anal sex when on the network are plenty of other sites focused on vag sex and without anal. For me it's like go to Italian restaurant and complain they doesn't have thai food .

[Kriss1986]

:D

Indeed my friend . Well illustrated lol.

[mistress_cindy2008]

What is happening here...

People are saying a man is gay for wanting to give a woman anal sex? WTF? Gay men give each other blowjobs.. does that mean if you want to see a girl suck cock you are gay?

If that is how this forum is turning out, I won't be around here long. What a bizarre line of thinking.

[Kriss1986]

What is happening here...

People are saying a man is gay for wanting to give a woman anal sex? WTF? Gay men give each other blowjobs.. does that mean if you want to see a girl suck cock you are gay?

If that is how this forum is turning out, I won't be around here long. What a bizarre line of thinking.

Well, long story in short - if you like 0% pussy scenes with non stop anal - you are gay . To clarify that wasn't my words, we have here person with special abilities - our greatest "Gayger counter". He is sniffing here to unmask all hidden gays . I understand your point of view and I know you are a little bit shocked - so do I but what can I say - "even death can't cure an idiot"...

[Kriss1986]

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:
What is happening here...

People are saying a man is gay for wanting to give a woman anal sex? WTF? Gay men give each other blowjobs.. does that mean if you want to see a girl suck cock you are gay?

If that is how this forum is turning out, I won't be around here long. What a bizarre line of thinking.

BTW don't discourage yourself my Friend please, on this board you can also find normal and very friendly people. If you would like to talk and share opinion with others in civilized way feel free and just ignore morons .

[avanfurwet]

What is happening here...

People are saying a man is gay for wanting to give a woman anal sex? WTF? Gay men give each other blowjobs.. does that mean if you want to see a girl suck cock you are gay?

If that is how this forum is turning out, I won't be around here long. What a bizarre line of thinking.

Sorry Cindy! Too much testosterone and muppetry in this forum. Which is why we need people like you & Laura. Hope you stick around.

[cyberhog59]

What is happening here...

People are saying a man is gay for wanting to give a woman anal sex? WTF? Gay men give each other blowjobs.. does that mean if you want to see a girl suck cock you are gay?

If that is how this forum is turning out, I won't be around here long. What a bizarre line of thinking.

Well, long story in short - if you like 0% pussy scenes with non stop anal - you are gay . To clarify that wasn't my words, we have here person with special abilities - our greatest "Gayger counter". He is sniffing here to unmask all hidden gays . I understand your point of view and I know you are a little bit shocked - so do I but what can I say - "even death can't cure an idiot"...

Whoever say that and for whatever reason, I care little what some pencil neck wank off thinks about anything around here. If it doesn't like DAP and anal sex, there are hundreds, even thousands of places for it to find satisfaction so it can fuck off to those. I could give a shit if it thinks I'm gay, I just question why it needs to come to a site DEVOTED to beautiful women giving their asses for our pleasure. Troll would be easy answer. I think it needs to be cut up for fish bait instead.

[mistress_cindy2008]

if you like 0% pussy scenes with non stop anal - you are gay ..

Why do you feel this way? Gay/Bi/Straight is defined by the people you have sex with, not what sex "acts" you do. LIke I said, gay men give blowjobs.. so if a man wants to see a girl give a blowjob is he gay? What absurd logic.

Anal sex with a hot woman, is having sex with a hot woman. A gay man will not want to fuck one of our Legal Porno female performers in the ass.

What a stupid analysis. Being blunt. If this is how the people in this forum think, I am out.

[laura.]

^
To be fair to him Cindy he didn't say that, he was paraphrasing someone else's views.

[avanfurwet]

if you like 0% pussy scenes with non stop anal - you are gay ..

Why do you feel this way? Gay/Bi/Straight is defined by the people you have sex with, not what sex "acts" you do. LIke I said, gay men give blowjobs.. so if a man wants to see a girl give a blowjob is he gay? What absurd logic.

Anal sex with a hot woman, is having sex with a hot woman. A gay man will not want to fuck one of our Legal Porno female performers in the ass.

What a stupid analysis. Being blunt. If this is how the people in this forum think, I am out.

@Cindy

You're entitled to leave in disgust of course. Plenty of idiocy in this largely unmoderated forum to be disgusted about, much worse than in this thread.

But in this case Kriss was being sarcastic in response to the lame taunts earlier in this thread.
And I don't think even the guy with the lame taunts actually claimed that anal with women was gay.
He claimed that if you only like anal with women and don't like vaginal sex then "you are gay".
Which is ridiculous of course, but he can post his opinion.
Unfortunately he threw in too many "you are gay" taunts, intentionally to provoke angry responses.

You will encounter some lame and unpleasant behaviour in this forum.
Anonymous posters calling for models to be humiliated and hurt, among other things.
Europe is less politically correct than North America. Russia for example is particularly homophobic.

Sorry, that won't change any time soon.

But without posters like you, and Laura, it won't change at all.

[laura.]

The stats speak for themselves and the simple fact of the matter is that a significant majority of members, me included, enjoy the 0% pussy scenes and what them to remain as is.

Conversely, on the 'how much pussy do you want in scenes' thread, i think (correct me if I am wrong)the highest polling result was 'some pussy'. If you extrapolate both of these results and apply a ratio, we are probably taking about a 75 to 25 split in favour of anal to pussy. A ratio that is there or thereabouts currently applied to the content of the scenes.

That for me works but if you start diluting the anal further until it becomes 50/50 you might as well rebrand the site and admit you have sold your soul and just become the same middle of the road porn site you find the world over.

LP isn't anal exclusive, it's anal centric and that is how it should remain. X

[avanfurwet]

The stats speak for themselves and the simple fact of the matter is that a significant majority of members, me included, enjoy the 0% pussy scenes and what them to remain as is.

Conversely, on the 'how much pussy do you want in scenes' thread, i think (correct me if I am wrong)the highest polling result was 'some pussy'. If you extrapolate both of these results and apply a ratio, we are probably taking about a 75 to 25 split in favour of anal to pussy. A ratio that is there or thereabouts currently applied to the content of the scenes.

That for me works but if you start diluting the anal further until it becomes 50/50 you might as well rebrand the site and admit you have sold your soul and just become the same middle of the road porn site you find the world over.

LP isn't anal exclusive, it's anal centric and that is how it should remain. X

Agree with the last sentence.

Percentages are debatable, especially drawing conclusions about what people here want to buy, if they could.
For example, I buy "0% pussy" scenes if they have models I like and if think overall I'll enjoy the scene, but definitely not because they are "0% pussy".
So I'm contributing to the high sales figures of "0% pussy", and I do enjoy the scenes I choose.
But I'm not a "0% pussy" fanboy, I just have to select from what's available, like everybody else.

[ZiziMinuscule]

It seems that everything has been said.

I understand where biZZler is going and I'm tending to share his point of view when he is stating that too rough anal can result in health damages. That said, I like watching pussy penetration as well as anal and I think that both have their place here. Just as avanfurwet stated it above, percentages are debatable, but I'm sure here, on LP, there is place for only anal lovers as well as for pussy lovers.

Naturally, as it is an anal-centered site, I don't think one can expect pussy only scenes.

For me, a decent scene is a scene where there is more or less 50/50. In other words, most of DPs match this ratio. I would prefer more 1 on 1 scenes, but again, LP is not only anal-cenered but also multiple-penetrations-cenetred so I need to accept that.

In other words, I would opt for increasing pussy sex rate, I think that perhaps there should be less no pussy porn - not because I don't like it but because I think that girls' health is what is the most important - but definetly it should exist because if properly prepared and performed, it can be more or less safe, it's sometimes just good to watch and it has it's devoted public.

[Kriss1986]

The stats speak for themselves and the simple fact of the matter is that a significant majority of members, me included, enjoy the 0% pussy scenes and what them to remain as is.

Conversely, on the 'how much pussy do you want in scenes' thread, i think (correct me if I am wrong)the highest polling result was 'some pussy'. If you extrapolate both of these results and apply a ratio, we are probably taking about a 75 to 25 split in favour of anal to pussy. A ratio that is there or thereabouts currently applied to the content of the scenes.

That for me works but if you start diluting the anal further until it becomes 50/50 you might as well rebrand the site and admit you have sold your soul and just become the same middle of the road porn site you find the world over.

LP isn't anal exclusive, it's anal centric and that is how it should remain. X

Agree with the last sentence.

Percentages are debatable, especially drawing conclusions about what people here want to buy, if they could.
For example, I buy "0% pussy" scenes if they have models I like and if think overall I'll enjoy the scene, but definitely not because they are "0% pussy".
So I'm contributing to the high sales figures of "0% pussy", and I do enjoy the scenes I choose.
But I'm not a "0% pussy" fanboy, I just have to select from what's available, like everybody else.

I also choose scenes based on my fav models and it's not important if scene is 0% pussy, DP, DAP. Yes of course it's always nice to see as much anal action as it's possible. As Laura siad LP "should stay anal centric". It's nothing wrong when conversation is going in a civilized manner, but you must admit in this topic it has gone too far , especially that 0% pussy productions are a minority of whole videos - correct me if I'm wrong.

[Electric_Logan]

It's anti-democratic man.. you're saying that people who want to see anal only scenes should not get what they want. Why? People who want to see non-anal scenes can get what they want easily, therefore people who want all anal scenes should be able to have what they want. Seriously the fact that you're arguing that all anal scenes should not exist is ridiculously absurd. Change your argument or remain a joke.

However, I do agree with your general sentiment with regards to DAP, TAP. I hate that stuff. I like just anal.. no DP either.. the main reason is because I like to actually be able to SEE the hotness! Way too much DP, DAP and TAP now is something I'm finding painfully frustrating, it's not that good! It's just a bunch of guys blocking us from seeing what we WANT to see! Sure some people like that, so y'know what I'm not going to do? I'm not going to say that it should not exist. I'm simply saying I'd like to see it invading scenes less often.

[laura.]

It's anti-democratic man.. you're saying that people who want to see anal only scenes should not get what they want. Why? People who want to see non-anal scenes can get what they want easily, therefore people who want all anal scenes should be able to have what they want. Seriously the fact that you're arguing that all anal scenes should not exist is ridiculously absurd. Change your argument or remain a joke.

However, I do agree with your general sentiment with regards to DAP, TAP. I hate that stuff. I like just anal.. no DP either.. the main reason is because I like to actually be able to SEE the hotness! Way too much DP, DAP and TAP now is something I'm finding painfully frustrating, it's not that good! It's just a bunch of guys blocking us from seeing what we WANT to see! Sure some people like that, so y'know what I'm not going to do? I'm not going to say that it should not exist. I'm simply saying I'd like to see it invading scenes less often.

Excellent post and quite a lot I agree with there, certainly your first paragraph which is my take on the debate.

I have noticed on many of the DAP heavy scenes I have watched recently that often the most exciting segments are the straight one on one anals, especially in Giorgio's scenes where they often lead up to the cumshots with some pumping doggy anal that really stirs your insides. Some of these bits have excited me more than the DAP bits. I think there is definite scope to increase this and focus more on depth and gaping.

I am inclined to agree with TAP, of the 20 or so I have watched over these last few years only a tiny handful have been worth the effort imho. Its just something too complex to make into something rhythmic and dynamic. I often feel like its just a tick box exercise that may look good on a girl's cv but nothing more. Some will disagree, I know.

I do however disagree on DAP, sure its demanding and often difficult to master, both for the performers and for the cameraman to film but when it's done right, and with the right performer, there is nothing better in porn - its just fabulous to watch and indulge in x

[mistress_cindy2008]

Not caring about pussy porn here at Legal Porno does not mean a person hates vaginas. It just means, we come to this product for a certain thing, and that is what we want to see.

I come here for Double Anal (that is my porn interest). I also love DPs so vaginal sex is good in that regard. If I want one on one vaginal sex, I can head over to use my Brazzers membership. There is no need to complain to Legal Porno about something that is not their niche. There are plenty of sites with great vaginal sex. This is like going to a Brazzers forum and complaining they don't have double anal!

[joaoraposo69]

Since I am a huge fan of anal sex(both in my private life and as a porn viewer) one of the reasons why I come here is to see girls getting fucked only in the ass.
I love no pussy scenes and I love the fact that this site focuses so much on it.

Please, continue this way.
I hope the next video is with a new girl being welcomed to porn and fucked by three huge cocks in the ass at the same time

[pornlover_holland]

There are many porn sites but the only website which is totally about very hard anal porn is LegalPorno. People who think that LP is too much about anal porn have lots of other websites to join. So I always find it quite strange that some people find LP too much anal orientated. I am an anal porn lover for more than 10 years now and the reason I like LP is because the anal is very very hard in every scene: almost no pussy fucking, gangbangs, double anal, gaping assholes, ass to mouth and ass to pussy. LP should stay a very hardcore anal site and not becoming more mainstream by making the scenes less anal orientated. Actresses who don't like extreme anal have enough other websites to work for.

[analaficionado]

I love the no pussy scenes! They're my biggest draw to Legal Porno. I know there's other sites who say their "all anal," but lets be honest they're not. They just mix in with all the other trash sites that say that. Everybody has their own taste, but I'm glad LG at least tries to do something a little different and cater to certain niches.

[leroisoleil83]

Boshanks is the only one who's making consistent sense in this thread. Just saying. The rest are too overly biased by their own preferences, to the extent of lack of concern for the performers. It's interesting someone mentioned toys, but if you're at the point you don't care for their welfare, then the stars are essentially toys, as well.

So thanks to him (or her? or both? ) for trying to look at it objectively. I agree, the site of blood is a huge turn off. The only bodily ejaculations I want to see in porn are squirting and cumming.

[avanfurwet]

Boshanks is the only one who's making consistent sense in this thread. Just saying. The rest are too overly biased by their own preferences, to the extent of lack of concern for the performers. It's interesting someone mentioned toys, but if you're at the point you don't care for their welfare, then the stars are essentially toys, as well.

So thanks to him (or her? or both? ) for trying to look at it objectively. I agree, the site of blood is a huge turn off. The only bodily ejaculations I want to see in porn are squirting and cumming.

^ That's a very broad brush you're using to tar every contributor to this thread. Laura and Cindy in particular are contributing as women with experience of anal, and I've never seen posts anywhere by either of them writing about performers as toys.

[Splatch]

Poll's results just say "0% pussy should exist"
And I dont think gay's people would come to this site ! There are too many (and beautiful) ladies

[Kriss1986]

Poll's results just say "0% pussy should exist"
And I dont think gay's people would come to this site ! There are too many (and beautiful) ladies

Thanks for your statement. I'm glad we have also normal people here .

[Kriss1986]

Not caring about pussy porn here at Legal Porno does not mean a person hates vaginas. It just means, we come to this product for a certain thing, and that is what we want to see.

I come here for Double Anal (that is my porn interest). I also love DPs so vaginal sex is good in that regard. If I want one on one vaginal sex, I can head over to use my Brazzers membership. There is no need to complain to Legal Porno about something that is not their niche. There are plenty of sites with great vaginal sex. This is like going to a Brazzers forum and complaining they don't have double anal!

Hello Cindy,

I fully agree! Most of us are here to see great anal action and I suppose most of us have nothing against vaginal sex. LP is mainly focused on butthole penetration and I don't see nothing wrong when someone like 0% pussy or DAP. As you said there are plenty of other sites focused on vaginal or "simply" anal. LP is exceptional place where fans of 100% anal or DAP can get appropriate content and it should stay as is.

[mistress_cindy2008]

Boshanks is the only one who's making consistent sense in this thread. Just saying. The rest are too overly biased by their own preferences, to the extent of lack of concern for the performers. It's interesting someone mentioned toys, but if you're at the point you don't care for their welfare, then the stars are essentially toys, as well.

So thanks to him (or her? or both? ) for trying to look at it objectively. I agree, the site of blood is a huge turn off. The only bodily ejaculations I want to see in porn are squirting and cumming.

You are also heavily biased. I can assume you are a guy because a woman would know that getting jackhammered by 5 porn guys in the vagina can also lead to injury, pain, chafing, and even cuts and bleeding. Porn is a physical career and potential for injury is possible with any sex act. YOu want to see cumming.. well, a girl can get an eye infection from it or catch herpes or chlaymidia.

so really, do you care about performers health or are just biased on your anti anal agenda? Based on the sex acts you want to see, you don't care about their welfare either. You just want to see what gets you off, like we all do.

Porn sex is risky and demanding with all sex acts, not just anal. So acting like you are the caring fan who doesn't want them to do anything that has potential for injury is hypocritcal to say the least. Creating your own false narrative that you are superior because you have this caring attitude is absurd.

[mdsflyby]

Porn sex is risky and demanding with all sex acts, not just anal. So acting like you are the caring fan who doesn't want them to do anything that has potential for injury is hypocritcal to say the least. Creating your own false narrative that you are superior because you have this caring attitude is absurd.

Bravo! Seems there's a lot of "caring" users in this forum lately and in fact heavily biased towards their own agenda to say the least

[laura.]

Boshanks is the only one who's making consistent sense in this thread. Just saying. The rest are too overly biased by their own preferences, to the extent of lack of concern for the performers. It's interesting someone mentioned toys, but if you're at the point you don't care for their welfare, then the stars are essentially toys, as well.

So thanks to him (or her? or both? ) for trying to look at it objectively. I agree, the site of blood is a huge turn off. The only bodily ejaculations I want to see in porn are squirting and cumming.

I m not going to have a dig at you here as you make some very valid posts and you clearly care about the girls which is evidenced by many of your sensitive posts I do hope however that your post here does not reflect anything I have written, as if you check hundreds of my posts you will know that the welfare of performers is, and always has been, my number one priority. I will call out abuse and misogyny whenever i see it, and I have commented numerous times that whenever there is bleeding from anal the filming should be stopped to make any necessary checks to see if the performer is ok and fit and ready to carry on.

What is important to remember is that full disclosure is made prior to any scene and during negotiations and performer has her right to either agree to, or decline, a 0% pussy scene. She is not forced into doing something against her will.

Anyone with a sense of decency would morally and rightfully object to any woman being treated like a toy, either in porn, or out x

[avanfurwet]

^ Good post Laura as always.

Also, @Cindy in fairness to leroi he didn't say or imply that he was anti-anal or that he didn't want performers to do anything with a potential risk of injury.
But he did indiscriminately accuse almost everyone in this thread of not caring about performers welfare. That's not how the thread reads.

The OP's claim/opinion was that girls are pushed too far too fast in 100% anal scenes and then leave LP because they get hurt.
The OP gave no evidence in support of those claims, which are debatable. And should be debated.

The OP's poll didn't ask about harming performers or scaring them away, just about whether LP should ban 0% pussy scenes.
Some posters then just wrote about how they want to see 100% anal scenes here. They didn't say, so we can't presume, whether they care about harm to performers.

IMO the question of harm to performers is only indirectly linked to whether a scene is 100% anal.
I agree with Cindy that girls can be harmed during vaginal sex, and cumshots. But also, I think anal involves proportionally more risk of hurt and harm.

Not good to throw a new girl in the deep end if she's not sufficiently practiced and experienced.
But IMO any harm and injury can also be caused by lack of care and professionalism which can hurt any girl in any scene, and shouldn't, ever.

Can't eliminate all risk from acts which are a performer's own career choice. But equally no excuse for reckless disregard for any performer's welfare.
And I see no reason to vilify someone for saying they don't want to see performers hurt and bleeding for our entertainment.

Wanting performers treated reasonably doesn't make anyone superior IMO, it just makes them normal.
And since most posters here are civilians and customers, nothing wrong with trying to educate ourselves and discuss the issues.

[Kriss1986]

Statement like 0% pussy causes more injuries than e.g. DP is balloney in my opinion. Does anyone can proof it? Ass and pussy can be injured in the same way, all depends how act looks like and how hard it is. From other side porn actresses in most cases are profesionalist and know how to training their bodies and what to do to avoid body detriment. It is also obvious girls are deciding to perform taht kind of scenes or DPP, DAP and oher rough stuff for money/fame/to check own capabilities or whatever. All of us would like to see good hard action at highest possible level and also most of us would like to see always happy, smiled girls enjoying the act. Nobody normal do not want to see painful scenes, bleed etc. Most of us agree that model's health is the most important thing. I can't understand why some members are treating 0% pussy as the biggest evil . It's like to say - "footballers shouldn't perform tackles because tackles are most danger actions in play. To protect their health they should only stay on the corner and wait for ball..." - supid right? Injuries are a part of most sports - football, F1, rally, superbike etc. All involved persons knows it very well. The same is with porn actresses. I also assume LP is a professional company and each girl is treated in appropriate way, with respect and health protection.

About pushing girls too far too fast in 100% anal scenes - agin bullshit. I doubt if anyone from LP is forcing girls to do that kind of scenes or to do anything their will. It's always actresses decision to perform scene or not. BTW how many girls performed 0% pussy scene in the debut? Additional I assume all girs know expectations and style LP before signing the contract.

[hjohjole]

I'm genuinely disappointed by the surplus scenes in the no pussy category these days. This has to change soon. The only reason why most of the good looking girls quit early is because of the health problems associated with too much of DAP, TAP etc and to make no pussy scenes is like fast forwarding the quitting periods much sooner than they should be. I wish this type of scenes would just stop, the same way they stopped piss scenes. At least for the sake of these girls that we all love to keep seeing more, in the future.

This argument just makes no sense to me. On top of everything that has already been said there is another point to be made. There is just as much anal in the regular dp scenes! Only with some simultaneous vaginal penetration in parts of the scene. How can that possibly be less harmful?
Shouldn't dp scenes also be banned to if they contain anal from start to finish? That would be the only reasonable demand if your argument is that anal sex as such is necessarily harmful.

Or if your argument is that only DAP and TAP is harmful then why did you not start a thread trying to ban that?

The answer is obvious. Your concern is not the health of the women. You simply like to see vaginal sex, so you are trying to get rid of scenes where there is no vaginal sex.

[Kriss1986]

I'm genuinely disappointed by the surplus scenes in the no pussy category these days. This has to change soon. The only reason why most of the good looking girls quit early is because of the health problems associated with too much of DAP, TAP etc and to make no pussy scenes is like fast forwarding the quitting periods much sooner than they should be. I wish this type of scenes would just stop, the same way they stopped piss scenes. At least for the sake of these girls that we all love to keep seeing more, in the future.

This argument just makes no sense to me. On top of everything that has already been said there is another point to be made. There is just as much anal in the regular dp scenes! Only with some simultaneous vaginal penetration in parts of the scene. How can that possibly be less harmful?
Shouldn't dp scenes also be banned to if they contain anal from start to finish? That would be the only reasonable demand if your argument is that anal sex as such is necessarily harmful.

Or if your argument is that only DAP and TAP is harmful then why did you not start a thread trying to ban that?

The answer is obvious. Your concern is not the health of the women. You simply like to see vaginal sex, so you are trying to get rid of scenes where there is no vaginal sex.

You have right - in DP scenes ass is used mostly at the same level as in 0% pussy scenes. So statement "only 0% pussy is dangerous to health of actresses" is just ridiculous. Well it would be nothing wrong if he would say "I don't like 0% pussy because I like when pussy is also involved". But this whole alleged care about health of women does not convince me and is misguided.

[avanfurwet]

I only just realised that the same poster who started this thread and set everyone at each other's throats concerning what hurts the models and who cares or doesn't care, also started that poll calling for 30 on 1 gangbangs, starting with the newest girls!

I'm genuinely disappointed by the surplus scenes in the no pussy category these days. This has to change soon. The only reason why most of the good looking girls quit early is because of the health problems associated with too much of DAP, TAP etc and to make no pussy scenes is like fast forwarding the quitting periods much sooner than they should be. I wish this type of scenes would just stop, the same way they stopped piss scenes. At least for the sake of these girls that we all love to keep seeing more, in the future.

http://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=13593#p112038

The scene should have about 30 guys against 1 girl and the scene should include all - anal,DP, DPP, DAP, rough sex, BBC, creampies in pussy, ass and facials distributed equally. I.e the girls must have done everything once they are through this scene

We could start the series with Selvaggia and Gabriella two of the hottest teens to ever come to LP. They started off with a bang by doing DP, DAP and 5 on 1 in their very first scenes!! No better choice than these 2 for this series.

[Kriss1986]

I only just realised that the same poster who started this thread and set everyone at each other's throats concerning what hurts the models and who cares or doesn't care, also started that poll calling for 30 on 1 gangbangs, starting with the newest girls!

I'm genuinely disappointed by the surplus scenes in the no pussy category these days. This has to change soon. The only reason why most of the good looking girls quit early is because of the health problems associated with too much of DAP, TAP etc and to make no pussy scenes is like fast forwarding the quitting periods much sooner than they should be. I wish this type of scenes would just stop, the same way they stopped piss scenes. At least for the sake of these girls that we all love to keep seeing more, in the future.

http://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=13593#p112038

The scene should have about 30 guys against 1 girl and the scene should include all - anal,DP, DPP, DAP, rough sex, BBC, creampies in pussy, ass and facials distributed equally. I.e the girls must have done everything once they are through this scene

We could start the series with Selvaggia and Gabriella two of the hottest teens to ever come to LP. They started off with a bang by doing DP, DAP and 5 on 1 in their very first scenes!! No better choice than these 2 for this series.

Hmmm... What can I say . It seems models health has nothing to do and isn't truly reason of starting this poll and whole mess. But you know it's always more meaningful to say "stop 0% pussy to protect womens health" than "stop 0% pussy because I don't like it"...

[laura.]

I only just realised that the same poster who started this thread and set everyone at each other's throats concerning what hurts the models and who cares or doesn't care, also started that poll calling for 30 on 1 gangbangs, starting with the newest girls!

I'm genuinely disappointed by the surplus scenes in the no pussy category these days. This has to change soon. The only reason why most of the good looking girls quit early is because of the health problems associated with too much of DAP, TAP etc and to make no pussy scenes is like fast forwarding the quitting periods much sooner than they should be. I wish this type of scenes would just stop, the same way they stopped piss scenes. At least for the sake of these girls that we all love to keep seeing more, in the future.

http://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=13593#p112038

The scene should have about 30 guys against 1 girl and the scene should include all - anal,DP, DPP, DAP, rough sex, BBC, creampies in pussy, ass and facials distributed equally. I.e the girls must have done everything once they are through this scene

We could start the series with Selvaggia and Gabriella two of the hottest teens to ever come to LP. They started off with a bang by doing DP, DAP and 5 on 1 in their very first scenes!! No better choice than these 2 for this series.

I think he may be suffering from cognitive dissonance!