My 2016 LP review

Moderators: aleksey_k, admin

User avatar
Naaru
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:25 am
Karma: 0

My 2016 LP review

Postby Naaru » Mon Oct 31, 2016 1:38 pm

So I wanted to write something in here for a while now, people that vaguely see my post sometimes will know ive been following LP/Sineplex for about 10 years, which seems insane but there you are – time passes. This is going to be quite a wordy piece so if you have no patience to read, just skip it I guess. I also will apologise as I might reference some things but not have a link to show what I mean specifically. If you are a regular here though you more than likely will know what I am talking about.

also I happen to have some time to kill today, this wasnt some big agenda for me lol I just thought it might be fun to write.

Image

Where are we?
I will start by saying that LP still represents the best producers of porn in its frequency and quality. So lets just lock that down. It should also be said that its obvious that porn is always highly subjective, whats right for one is not right for everyone. I think its important to say this before launching a breakdown so that people realise a studio/s will always change over time and experiment. Some people will hate changes others will love it.

2016 has been a pretty interesting year for LP but I also feel like there are some critical changes I feel would benefit. Mainly because as someone who used to be pretty much foaming at the mouth to use my tickets for scenes from LP now I find those tickets stacking up month on month, and I browse through the many scenes cherry picking the ones that suit me. Do I expect LP as a collective production to listen to one persons opinion?
No obviously not. All I can do though is voice my opinion as a long time customer. When it comes to tickets I am not the only one who I see voicing the feeling that something has changed and its just not quite on point at the moment.

I guess the obvious question is: Has the quality of production in LP dropped in 2016? The answer is clearly no, and that is perhaps what is most frustrating. It's very difficult to pinpoint what it is that feels different now, the scenes are still very hardcore, the girls are still amazing but there are some subtle differences that do seem to become more common over time, and I think that in porn for all of its raw visual appeal and often brutal physical appetites its the the subtle changes which effect the quality of the content the most. The things which dont seem that important but ultimately are.

Changes we've seen in 2016
So what are the changes we have seen? I will list these in bullet points then talk a little on them.
- Longer scene intros
- No more / or rare Milk-Kreme scenes
- We see Less teen models – or 22+ girls labelled as teens
- Tipping
- Sidesaddle
- DAP/TAP
- Rare A2P
- Less DP
- Sloppy A2M
- Male smothering
- Loss of Core models

Changes I hope to see in 2017

Shorter Scene Intros
If you look back to the so called 'golden age' of LP/Sineplex very often the girls would walk in, kiss, contact each other and then straight into assplay with one another, then maybe 3-5 mins later the scene would begin. Now some of the intros can be 10-15 minutes long, and often not all that interesting. She does a slow strip, she plays a bit etc its boring and tedious. Now some people of course may find this appealing and also its not the biggest issue you can simply skip forward, but it highlights one of those small changes to scenes which mark a difference from how raw LP/SP used to be to how it is now.
This need not necessarily be bad though, take some of the intros from Giorgio's content, where the girl starts enjoying herself a bit, but this is then taken over by the camera/director in a pov toy session before the main scene. This is far more interesting, similarly 2 girls always better than one.

I guess what im saying is that previously it was more about the action, but now it seems that its very much about providing an overall package of content, and that can be positive or negative depending on your POV. Perhaps if its a single girl scene though that intro should be cut down or at least get her some help quicker.

Image

More - Milk-Kreme scenes
Who doesn't like seeing a fountain of kreme spewing from a girls gaping asshole? Exactly. It's a great shame these scenes have been reduced or stopped completely now, I personally never saw a great explanation for this. Maybe it was something technical, maybe models dont want to do it, maybe it was a style choice I don't know. What I do know is that these formed an epic period for LP which gave some of the best scenes on here, when Kreme scenes were a thing they were a MUST have. It also gave a genuine variety between scenes and you could even say allowed the non-kreme scenes to shine more.

For whatever reason its a shame that we wont see scenes like this often if at all:
Hennessy + Sandra - http://www.legalporno.com/watch/27928/c ... _ass_sz388
Nikita Belucci + Katie Gold - http://www.legalporno.com/watch/26607/n ... porno_sz35
Swan + Luberc - http://www.legalporno.com/watch/27987/j ... ing_sz402_
or my god Benta - http://www.legalporno.com/watch/187/mil ... scene_1466

Image

More teen models | Less 22yo+ girls labelled as teens
Ok so I think anyone who watches hardcore porn knows that teen models fucking extremely hard is just about the hottest thing. We know this. LP/SP used to have a huge selection of teen girls performing in all variety of scenes. This really seems to have decreased greatly. Yes we do have new talent coming through here and there but it is definitely in the minority of scenes, and there really is a difference in the scenes for that reason. Its also just very annoying when a scene is labelled Teens X and Y do blah blah - when you are thinking... no.. they are not ive watched these models in countless scenes for years.

I have talked about this specific issue many times, I think it would be extremely strong for LP to have a series which focused on providing the content it already does but with a teen theme. EvilAngel seems to have no issue finding girls in the 18-19 bracket who can perform balls deep penetration for good scene length. Also studios like First Anal Quest also the same deal, and historically it never was a problem especially for an Eastern Europe focused studio like LP/SP? so what the hell is going on?

Don't get me wrong we do have some great models like:
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3218/crystal_greenvelle
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3252/luna_rival
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3281/may_thai
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3293/nicole_love
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3329/anna_de_ville
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3290/rebecca_volpetti
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3331/allen_benz
http://www.legalporno.com/model/3339/tyna

As I have said many times, one of the best series I ever saw was University Gangbang specifically 1-6 this featured no holds barred hardcore fucking, no time wasting with intros just teen girls (mostly pretty sure not all were 19-19) being gangbanged with lots of DP, A2M, A2P, gaping, balls deep fucking the whole thing. Also as I said seeing things like First Anal Quest or TryTeens these series focused on hard anal fucking with teens.

If you go back through LP/SP we see that this has declined over time and perhaps its because of the type of content LP is putting out now I dont know, but it just seems that its become less regular and that is really frustrating, the girls that we do have making scenes for LP as I listed above do so not frequently at all, and this is the frustrating thing. If we were seeing these models producing content regularly amid all the other stuff it would be just fine, but that is not the case at all and I personally feel its frustrating and weakens the content of LP as a studio.

Less Tipping
Ugh dreaded tipping. This has become one of the most irritating things of the past year, and I think its directly because of this new focus on DAP. I think that LP decided that they needed to DAP to differentiate themselves from other producers and thats just fine. When a scene though starts to focus on DAP for a long % of a scene or even worse when the model clearly cannot take a DAP with any sort of depth it just becomes a boring sausage fest. Watching 2 guys slapping their cocks together is not very appealing in fact its flat out boring. If the model can take a DAP then of course do it throw that in the scene switch it up its great, but god enough enough already with the DAP tipping its so incredibly annoying. All you are thinking is please stop and get on with it.

Its not limited to DAP of course either we have seen an absolute increase in tipping in a lot of scenes instead of much deeper or balls deep penetration, again I recommend you visit some of the older LP or SP scenes and you will see exactly what I mean. Again I cannot explain why this is now a thing, I would have thought it would be an absolute requirement if you were going to do a scene for LP that you be able to actually handle what is involved. A huge amount of customers on LP have spoken about this I very much beg XXX and others to please ensure this happens as little as possible in 2017.

Image
Image

More Sidesaddle Assfucking

I love this position its epic, where the girl sits sideways to the guys lap as she is assfucked its very hot but again one of those positions which is used very infrequently. Go back to scenes with Tina Hot, and Jessica Swan and you see it much more. So not much else to say. This. More.

Image
Image

Less - DAP/TAP
I spoke about this above already, but short version - I know that LP wants to throw some differences in the scenes and that is of course great. Please though for gods sake make sure the models can actually take the DAP in some sense otherwise its a total waste of time. I don't know about others but I would rather see a model having a deep anal penetration with a big gape 100 times more than a DAP or TAP where the guys can barely do anything and just sort of sandwich themselves around, its weird and boring to watch.

More A2P and Keep DP
Another style we see less if any of is A2P or Ass to Pussy for those of you who are clueless. I talked about this before again with a mixed reaction, some people suggested this was toned back a lot for health reasons but after I did some reading I found very little evidence for that. Its understandable of course from that pov but I think generally I find a hard time to think its any more dangerous healthwise than A2M and there is certainly no reduction in that.
A2P is an amazing element to put into a scene, seeing the model have a cock pulled out of here gaping ass only to be pushed straight into her pussy and see her ass squashed is absolutely awesome, oftentimes you would then also have another guy come in and fuck her ass and change it to a DP. These moments in scenes were amazing but we see it less and less now, a great loss.

Image

More DP. There have been endless polls and discussion around it, here is the deal for me.
Yes its great to have some scenes focus just on anal, yes we shouldnt have many scenes where we over focus on one thing. DP though should be included as much as possible because it is just very hot - its true of course that the mainstream sites always will have this but LP should be able to differentiate from those sites in other ways such as model quality - scene variety - quality directing and so on. Excluding DP just to stand apart from other sites seems completely stupid to me. A model being DPed with deep penetration is always excellent especially if she is being stretched hard and riding cowgirl. We should see it more commonly in scenes and make use of the great talent pushed to the limit.

More Sloppy A2M

I am just going to copy my previous post from last year about this because the issue of seeing less A2M especially very sloppy mouth fucking continues. XXX said he would remind directors about this at the time, not sure that had any impact. viewtopic.php?f=53&t=9384

I think ive mentioned this before in some ideas but I really would like to see more regular ATM, it used to be a key feature in the older sineplex scenes years ago which I thankfully still have on dvd. It does make an apperance in current scenes but its often about 10% whereas it used to be more like 30-40% of the scene.
We are talking one girl with her head on the others round ass, waiting patiently as the other girl is getting fucked deep in the ass. Then he swaps to give the waiting girl some sloppy mouth fucking, then back to the other girl so on. Sometimes the girl giving oral is also getting fucked herself at the same time but she continues giving outstanding messy oral deep throating spitting saliva dripping out of her mouth.

This could potentially even be a whole new series focused specifically on this?

Image
Image

Less Male smothering

Something new that I have seen others talk about, I dont think its a huge problem personally but worth mentioning because we do not want this to become something regular in 2017. Basically again because of the continual focus on DAP and some of the larger gangbangs there often is an issue where you can barely see the girl underneath all of the guys in the scene. Obviously not a great thing.
I think this comes back to what I was saying about focusing on producing content that stands out but for the wrong reasons, namely that it sounds good on paper, but in reality when you have so many people its going to be hard to see things.

This need not be bad overall again, it just will mean that maybe those scenes need to be looked at differently having a second girl in the mix always helps dilute the numbers back a bit if necessary and allows of course from some great cross overs and A2M A2A etc.

Image
- This scene has a great position and you still see everything - granted its a 3 on 1 but we should keep the shots clear for viewers

Establish Core models
Lastly an issue thats been spoken about before again. In the last year for one reason or another (and this is always going to happen) we have seen a loss of core talent, many great performers are gone and it often feels a bit of a mixed bag of newbies and seasoned talent in the LP scenes. This is one of those things that sounds great on paper but in reality... meh. What we need is a really great core of models for LP, a blend of the perfect age ranges 18-25 and who can peform with enthusiasm, hardcore skills, fun and be extremely filthy of course.

Image

The likes of Luna Rival and Kira Thorn. Kira has only done a couple of scenes? WHY! she should be doing 2 a week! Luna has only done seven scenes in the whole of 2017 just seven! the last was Sep 13 and its now November! wtf is going on here?
Kira: http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31687/g ... ion_sz1509
Luna: http://www.legalporno.com/watch/30937/t ... _dp_sz1224

This should be a huge priority for 2017 - to find a core group of models who can produce regular intense scenes with as many of the elements listed above included. They could even be announced as the core models for LP in a one time 90 minute orgy scene with Kreme Sloppy A2M Balls deep fucking and all the rest? Tell me with a straight face people wouldnt buy that up in an instant.

2017 +
So 2017 is near, I hope that we will see some changes coming to LP that will retain all the reasons we are still here such as: Production quality, regular releases, hard fucking action, innovation, awesome talent.

I do ask though that XXX and other directors consider the aspects of their scenes that enabled LP to get to where it is. While the content does continue to be amazing it feels very much as if we have moved sideways from where we were and I hope that we can just steer back on course to producing in my opinion the best porn available anywhere.
Cheers and to 2017!

Its worth checking back to the classic scenes http://www.legalporno.com/watch/361/dou ... creenshots
Attachments
Toys.jpg
DoubleA.jpg
Kreme.jpg
Tina-Full.jpg
Tina-Side-1.jpg
Kira-DP.jpg
Luna-Deep.jpg
Kira-Full.jpg
Kira-Deep.jpg
Tina-Side-2.jpg
Sandra Luberc - Natalia Pearl - Hennessy - Jessica Swan - Scarlet Domingo - Ellie Margaret - Sabrine - Juliya

User avatar
JohnMcSpunkencock
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 4749
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:27 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby JohnMcSpunkencock » Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:33 pm

Nice piece mate. It's all a matter of personal taste of course but it's been a very good year and seen significant changes. Some will like some won't. That's life. Sales are what counts in the end while still maintaining that essential LP feel
SHOW ALL OF OUR BABES LOVE. EVERY BABE NEEDS IT

laura.
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 2955
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:48 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby laura. » Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:20 pm

That was a wonderful read and thoroughly enjoyed it, love the pics also.

First off I share your passion for this site and steadfastly agree that it's without peer or rival, it's so far ahead of the competition it's unreal. That's not to say it's invincible as it isn't and it would be foolish for the site to rest on its laurels.

I was nodding in agreement with large chunks of your suggestions so I'll cover them in a moment. Where I disagree is on Kreme, which I never saw the attraction in and just served to obscure the gorgeous genitalia on show, and dap, which I love more than any other porn act and will never complain about its ubiquity.

Where I do agree the most about is teens, I am also an unashamed sucker for hot 19 year old doing naughty things, that hard bodied teasing charm is pretty irresistible. What the likes of FAQ and the outstanding TCC did so well was to present gorgeous teen girls next door having simple uncomplicated anal sex, nothing fancy, nothing drawn out, just an effective formula for amazing 30 minute scene's. What they did fall short imho was the production values, and in the case of TCC, the occasional lapse into torturesque porn. If you couple the basic premise with the production values of LP, you'd have a brilliant spin off series. Obviously a steady supply of teen talent is required and sadly we don't have the same volume coming out of ST Petersburg as we did pre-putin clampdown. I am unfamiliar with the scouting process but newbies are the lifeblood of this industry so hopefully someone somewhere has got their eyes open. Still, with the likes of Rebecca V, Gabriella, Rebecca and a few more, we have the makings of something in that department. The rest I guess is down to luck, timing and scouting.

Core models have made reference to on a number of occasions, theyre imperative to promoting the brand, generating sales, and giving the right performers a lucrative salary. Kira and the likes should be offered the world imho. Simple.

I noted in my comments on the latest Natalia and Gina scene about the quality of the ATM's, it's a fetish I love and often overlooked.

That's all for now but once again thanks for your efforts. I will add further should this worthy thread grow x

leroisoleil83
Established Member
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 4:51 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby leroisoleil83 » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:38 pm

There's so much said I barely know where to begin. To keep thing short, I'll just stick with what came to mind and stuck with me till now.
1. I really don't think "tipping" is as big a problem as many have suggested in this forum. Yes hard sex is ideal, but one must keep in mind the comfort of the female, and the intimacy (if there is any) of the moment.
2. I miss Kreme, too.
3. Male smothering is a problem here, and something many have spoken about before, not just in 2016 - though with the over abundance of 10-on-1 scenes it has gotten worse.
4. I like scenes with multiple girls, too, but only if the girls are into each other. Examples from 2016 - Nekane and Blanche were great together, but Rebecca and Anna were not. Similarly after the orgy in the recent Clockwork series, the gangbang with Belle seemed a little lackluster. But I might be getting off-topic here, sorry.
5. I think the site is doing a good enough job with teen models. They've heavily featured at least 4 or 5 this year, and for their age I think that's enough. If you over-shoot with teen models they will quit the biz faster, and would deter from another point you made of keeping/getting established models who want to stay with the site, and not seek greener pastures (forgive my NA expression) as many older "established models" have done - sites where they get paid more, but perform less intensely :(. All that to say yes, teens are great, but it's risky to overdo it.

avanfurwet
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby avanfurwet » Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:54 pm

^ Good posts! Thanks esp Naaru for your thoughtful thread starter.

Everyone is different and the studios can't please all the people all the time. But it's good to try to communicate what we want and don't want.

I guess people will always feel more motivated to post about what they don't like and want to see changed or when they don't see what they want. So we should also post to say when we like something and want to see LP do more of the same.

FWIW this is my input;


Intros

I'm OK with longer intros so long as they're not at the expense of the main scene.
I like the outdoor to indoor intros, especially in summer.

I think the best possible intro is 2 girls chattering before & whilst playing with each other. Not always practical due to language constraints, although I'm not that fussed what language they converse in.



Kreme

Personal thing for people to love or hate.
Personally I think if girls are going to get messy then kreme is the fun thing to play with.
I hate oil and I never saw the point of milk at all.


Teens

LP get some of the very best new girls to do very hot scenes. If more girls of comparable quality can be sourced then I agree it would be great to have a "teens" series going at LP. They could start by booking that Sofy Soul while shes's still 19.

Not sure how often such girls come around, though. The Russian "production line" dried up after 2011 and I guess fewer girls want to be available to get sponsored for EU visas to fly to Prague. And when FirstAnalQuest feature Kerry Cherry and Afina in teen-themed scenes at around the same time that other sites are beginning to tag these same girls as milfs then I'm even less convinced.

EvilAngel directors in LA are I guess in a similar position to the studios in St Petersburg during the Russian renaissance because they have a huge local talent pool (20+ million area population plus incomers) who can do castings and shoots on their afternoon off, and maybe develop a career from there.

Luring hot teens into the Prague studios may present more logistic challenges.

With LP, we also have enough stunning milfs with the likes of Klara and Luca Bella swelling the ranks, so a milf series to balance the teens series would be nice.


Tipping

Agree mostly. Not into DAP for it's own sake just so they can say "DAP" in the scene description.
If a girl can perform it well, wonderful, let's go.
But I'd rather watch a girl enjoying good deep single anal than enduring bad double.
Plus with single anal you can actually see the girl instead of all those male butts.

Playing devil's advocate, I appreciate Giorgio encouraging the girls to try, and then they should be paid the correct rate, so maybe economics dictate they keep the footage in and sell the scene as DAP.

So maybe we just have to be aware of what's in the scene from the trailer and screenshots before deciding whether we want to see the girl enough to buy the scene.


Sidesaddle

No strong feelings for this one. But those pert bottoms do look good from that angle.

I do think there should be more reverse cowgirl with the girl's feet planted on the guy's thighs.


Less TP/DAP

Agree it should be used sparingly since it doesn't often show the girl off to best advantage.


More A2P and Keep DP

Agree with keeping DP. Used in the same way and same positions as DAP. Not overused so the girl doesn't disappear under male bodies.

Not bothered about ATP myself.


More Sloppy A2M

Agree with more sloppy deepthroat, sloppier the better. Not bothered about ATM.


Less Male smothering

Agree. Need to show off the girls. More girls in the mix is always good.


Establish Core models

I'm fairly new to the site so lack your perspective of the "good old days".

IMO there is a good balance of local and visiting established girls, up and comers, and some exciting newbies breaking through.

People here do seem to have their different favourites, from a diverse range of models. For example I'd love to see Kira do more scenes if she wants to because she's a favourite of mine.

But I think plenty of others will always complain that their favourite models aren't getting enough callbacks. So we do need variety.


Other things - location shooting

One thing I think the more "mainstream" studios do well in California and Hungary is to use summer outdoor locations at villas, gardens and swimming pools. Outdoor = more light and more scene possibilities incl. shooting wet.

Obviously the economics have to work out, but maybe an opportunity for a new studio or "label" without the fixed overheads of an established location to find a new niche for themselves shooting at rented/borrowed locations.

Seemed to work well in Mexico, until they fucked up.
And Giorgio is branching out with his Clockwork series filming on location, which is good :)

User avatar
gapefan
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 8263
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:22 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby gapefan » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:02 pm

The more Double Anal, the better! :cool:

Long live DAP! :D

And long live LegalPorno! ;)

laura.
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 2955
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:48 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby laura. » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:22 pm

Outdoor shooting was something I'd hope we would have seen more of but aside from the Lucy Danville scene, we were left hanging. I am sure I saw a preview of a Gina outdoor somewhere?

I would love to see much more mixing up of locations, sadly winter is beckoning so we'll have a long wait!

moorerocky458
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 8:22 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby moorerocky458 » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:28 pm

gapefan wrote:The more Double Anal, the better! :cool:

Long live DAP! :D

And long live LegalPorno! ;)


Agree
Long live DAP! :D

And long live LegalPorno! ;)

TheVulture
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:26 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby TheVulture » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:41 pm

Really good piece there fella.

Definitely true on the intros. Just far too long. Porn should be visceral and a 15-20 minute build-up before the sex action begins undoubtedly reduces a scene's heat potential. I'm pretty sure they are so long mainly just to increase the length of the scenes. Me? I even skip the solo masturbation sections of the trailers. Scale them back or even get rid of them completely. Less is more.

Agree with DAP also. It's more of a hindrance than a help. I think there's only a very select few girls where it looks good. Proxy Paige springs to mind - the combination of a really big bum and its obvious, shall we say, elasticity. :D When Proxy takes DAP it practically looks like single anal at times so can still be hard, fast and visceral. But that's a rare example. DP > DAP every time. Much more intense and horny. In cases where DAP can add a bit to a scene it should always come quite late in the scene for me. Personally my fave bits tend to be the pounding single anal sections and if these come after there's already been tons of DAP (as is often the case) it can't help but be a bit of an anti-climax in some regards. You have to think the girl would view it as a step backwards and be less turned on by it. The scene has left itself nowhere to go basically - it's kind of like going from fucking back to blow jobs. So yeah, Proxy and 1 or 2 others aside ditch DAP and bring back DP! This wheel doesn't need reinventing! :D

I've just about got used to the generic white room setting for the scenes and in some cases can see its advantages. Cut out the superfluous stuff and that. However, a definite bone of contention for me is how the guys just walk into the scenes naked. It just looks too staged. Too "porn". Christoph Clark had this thing with his scenes (which were essentially "gonzo" in the same way and often used the same room - his lounge, I assume) where the camera would cut away from the girl(s) and you'd see his guys (David Perry or Choky Ice usually) still clothed but with their dicks out wanking. That was incredibly horny for me. It mimics the way the male viewer is absorbing the scene; sort of places you there (if only ha ha ha). Clark knew what he was doing and LP need to work on this for me. Again it's too "buddy porn" and not sizzling enough. Not "of the moment". The naked walk-on says "We're some guys here to fuck some girls for money. We did the same thing yesterday and we'll do it tomorrow and so on" and it says it in spades. There's no sense of wonderment/excitement. I'm not saying you need the guys to act innocent or shocked or anything but they should certainly start the scenes clothed and even remain partly clothed throughout scenes. It just makes the whole thing look more hungry and spontaneous and I would think would turn the girls on more as well.

Beyond that for me it's just the basic things. Guys who want to fuck rather than dominate/humiliate girls. No throat grabbing, no holding of girls heads/general reduction of them to inanimate showroom dummies, no excessive slapping, no annoying buddy porn "look at me" bullshit. Just guys that fuck and fuck hard and let the girls sluttiness shine. This represents perhaps 15-20% of LP's output at best, sadly, but it's still worth looking out for. Just about. Or I wouldn't be here writing this.
Last edited by TheVulture on Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
More non-manhandle scenes please. Hands away from face/neck/shoulders. Keep the girls loose, free and expressive. Don't overpower them - let them sizzle! Keep the heels on. More panties pulled to one side. More skirts/tight dresses. More 0% pussy scenes.

Dzentungen_Blacksmith
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:24 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby Dzentungen_Blacksmith » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:43 pm

moorerocky458 wrote:
gapefan wrote:The more Double Anal, the better! :cool:

Long live DAP! :D

And long live LegalPorno! ;)


Agree
Long live DAP! :D

And long live LegalPorno! ;)

if all scenes were here same as Norma Jane with ian, mike and marcus on rocco, or ivana sugar gangbanged in hosemonster - i would be more than happy, but something is missing here, i dont understand what

User avatar
magizi877
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 3930
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:26 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby magizi877 » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:02 pm

I remember them saying why Kreme scenes were no longer a thing they would produce and basically, it was because sales figures were low for that type of scene.

They were not prohibited, they are just not worth the time and money that goes into them.

I'm sure somebody can find the link to the correct thread.

I also think that a higher ratio of movies feature some of the hardest and most intense sex ever produced by LP. Tipfucking was mostly a sineplex problem IMO. They wasted generations of women with countless training scenes and in comes Giorgio and demonstrates that you don't need to do take it slow. I think gonzo realized that, because most of their scenes now, are pretty hardcore in the sex department.

With some exceptions, for instance both Tyra Moon scenes were pretty soft in the penetration aspect. But she is so beautiful we'll let her get away with it. :cool:

But most scenes I have gotten are jaw dropping kind of awesome in the sex.

DP is something that Giorgio is basically not interested at all, but luckily gonzo still produces. I still fantasize for scenes that are DP only from start to finish and it's so disappointing that DAP movies are closest to achieve that.

I think OP somewhat contradicts himself when it comes to teens. Because he wants a core of models to be regular at LP, and he wants them to be teens.
But models with a large enough fanbase to justify a big number of scenes usually age out of teen status by then, because they stayed in the industry for 3 to 5 years.

I think women with a large fanbase get there because they are prettier and perform better, instead of being 18 or 19.

I mean a sufficiently pretty woman, 20 or older, can say she is 18 and most of us won't care of she is 18, 20, or 30. She is hot, that's all that matters.

And this is just a theory but I assume most fans of teen models are also teens themselves and probably cannot afford a website like LP. And probably don't pay for porn at all.

And don't get me wrong, if a see a super gorgeous outrageously beautiful woman, that also happens to be a 18 or 19 year old, I'm not gonna pass on her scenes.

User avatar
gapefan
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 8263
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:22 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby gapefan » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:08 pm

The Double Anal at LegalPorno is always top shelf material! :cool:

Trust me! As a true fan of the genre, I would know! ;)

All models who wish to perform it are more than welcome! :)

Keep the DAP coming LegalPorno! And I'll keep buying it! :D

avanfurwet
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:02 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby avanfurwet » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:28 pm

magizi87 wrote:I remember them saying why Kreme scenes were no longer a thing they would produce and basically, it was because sales figures were low for that type of scene.


I don't know. I joined quite recently. Did today's LP really shoot kreme and monitor their sales properly?

Or is this anecdotal from the olden days of original Sineplex/Evilutionplex in Russia who shot epic scenes but couldn't manage a petty cash float, let alone build a functioning web sales business, or even a functioning website.
In which case, who knows what sold?

magizi87 wrote:And this is just a theory but I assume most fans of teen models are also teens themselves and probably cannot afford a website like LP. And probably don't pay for porn at all.


And I don't know the analytics, but I'd guess most fans of teen models are middle aged guys for whom it's a guilty pleasure to watch girls who could be their daughter's hot friends. (OK, that describes me :o )

Iddaoeeok
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 3259
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 8:34 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby Iddaoeeok » Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:31 am

Ok so I think anyone who watches hardcore porn knows that teen models fucking extremely hard is just about the hottest thing. We know this.


Debatable. :cool:

I think women with a large fanbase get there because they are prettier and perform better, instead of being 18 or 19.

I mean a sufficiently pretty woman, 20 or older, can say she is 18 and most of us won't care of she is 18, 20, or 30. She is hot, that's all that matters.


Says it better than I could. :)

User avatar
Naaru
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:25 am
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby Naaru » Tue Dec 27, 2016 4:06 pm

I posted this back in October, but I think its still relevant as a whole year review so if people wanted to have a read, here it is.
Sandra Luberc - Natalia Pearl - Hennessy - Jessica Swan - Scarlet Domingo - Ellie Margaret - Sabrine - Juliya

User avatar
Anotherfine
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 740
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:53 pm
Karma: 0

Re: My 2016 LP review

Postby Anotherfine » Tue Dec 27, 2016 6:18 pm

I think LP wen't downhill in the last couple of months of the year, But between January and and October it had been stellar but there was no way they could keep up the quality, That or I just got bored and fancied a porn change of scenery
We're all in this together, except you, you're a dick


Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mitchell878 and 42 guests